Still gap seems on the verge of 1s to me. And thats whats stated in the rules. In any way - good for him. Bit lucky.You know that this video is in slow motion, right?
Still gap seems on the verge of 1s to me. And thats whats stated in the rules. In any way - good for him. Bit lucky.You know that this video is in slow motion, right?
You know that this video is in slow motion, right?
I would call it "extremely" lucky that this rule applies to a finish like today. After rewatching the crash and the passage prior to it, I just don't agree with some people's claims that there was a significant gap between the two riders.Still gap seems on the verge of 1s to me. And thats whats stated in the rules. In any way - good for him. Bit lucky.
No it wasn't. I rewatched it a couple of times (even stopping the time) and there was clearly no 2 second gap.Slow speed turn. In the straight, it was clear there was a 2 second gap
Like in the 2022 Vuelta when he waited with his bike change(?) until 3 km to go so he would get the same time as the peloton? He finished 3 minutes behind the peloton after Rogla attacked near the finish.Can you imagine the collective wad folks' panties would be in if Remco had benefitted from a ruling like this?
Would be absolutely incredible.
Exactly. As we can see, people are still whining about it.Like in the 2022 Vuelta when he waited with his bike change(?) until 3 km to go so he would get the same time as the peloton? He finished 3 minutes behind the peloton after Rogla attacked near the finish.
CQ Ranking - Vuelta a España, Stage 16 : Sanlucar de Barrameda - Tomares
CQ Ranking is the world's leading cycling ranking and extensive results database. Also known as Cycling Quotient.cqranking.com
Evenepoel cheated, Rogla didn't.Exactly. As we can see, people are still whining about it.
How would this stage change my opinion? But it‘s good that he actually pulled today because it would have been very questionable otherwise.So, for the haters here: Is JV still a wheel sucking coward? Or is he just riding smart?
I mean if you want to keep making my point for me, please continue.Evenepoel cheated, Rogla didn't.
Like in the 2022 Vuelta when he waited with his bike change(?) until 3 km to go so he would get the same time as the peloton? He finished 3 minutes behind the peloton after Rogla attacked near the finish.
CQ Ranking - Vuelta a España, Stage 16 : Sanlucar de Barrameda - Tomares
CQ Ranking is the world's leading cycling ranking and extensive results database. Also known as Cycling Quotient.cqranking.com
Furthermore, notice that today was exactly as intended by the rule. Back then in 2022, the puncture was before 3 km to go so by the letter of the rule, it was a mistake to give Evenepoel the same time as the peloton.
Like in the 2022 Vuelta when he waited with his bike change(?) until 3 km to go so he would get the same time as the peloton? He finished 3 minutes behind the peloton after Rogla attacked near the finish.
CQ Ranking - Vuelta a España, Stage 16 : Sanlucar de Barrameda - Tomares
CQ Ranking is the world's leading cycling ranking and extensive results database. Also known as Cycling Quotient.cqranking.com
Furthermore, notice that today was exactly as intended by the rule. Back then in 2022, the puncture was before 3 km to go so by the letter of the rule, it was a mistake to give Evenepoel the same time as the peloton.
Maybe because he beat Pog in a sprint? Which as a first as far as I know.How would this stage change my opinion? But it‘s good that he actually pulled today because it would have been very questionable otherwise.
Technically speaking he did beat him in the sprint to the bonus point on stage 14 last year.Maybe because he beat Pog in a sprint. Which has never happened before as far as I know.
Thats fair... I don't recall thatTechnically speaking he did beat him in the sprint to the bonus point on stage 14 last year.
Of course it was. A crash on a descent within the last 3 km when not finishing on top of a climb is exactly what is meant to be covered. A puncture more than 3 km from the finish is not.Today was certainly not as intended by the rule.
Your videos are better than the Eurosport one (further out). I revise my view. Its clear that he was in contact.No it wasn't. I rewatched it a couple of times (even stopping the time) and there was clearly no 2 second gap.
View: https://imgur.com/fyQwltj
View: https://imgur.com/N16Lebo
How is that supposed to be a > 1 second gap on a downhill stretch?
Rnk | Prev | ▼▲ | Rider | Team | UCI | Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | 22 | ▼1 | MARTIN Guillaume | Cofidis | 20:36 | ||
30 | 31 | ▲1 | BERNARD Julien | Lidl - Trek | 33:36 | ||
33 | 41 | ▲8 | MADOUAS Valentin | Groupama - FDJ | -40″ | 42:40 | |
34 | 36 | ▲2 | ARMIRAIL Bruno | Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale Team | 43:45 | ||
40 | 45 | ▲5 | SIVAKOV Pavel | UAE Team Emirates | 52:04 | ||
41 | 37 | ▼4 | BARGUIL Warren | Team dsm-firmenich PostNL | 52:29 | ||
42 | 40 | ▼2 | BARDET Romain | Team dsm-firmenich PostNL | 10″ | 53:09 | |
53 | 54 | ▲1 | GRÉGOIRE Romain | Groupama - FDJ | 1:05:32 | ||
60 | 75 | ▲15 | PRODHOMME Nicolas | Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale Team | 1:13:52 | ||
61 | 61 | - | PACHER Quentin | Groupama - FDJ | 4″ | 1:14:28 |
Can you imagine the collective wad folks' panties would be in if Remco had benefitted from a ruling like this?
Would be absolutely incredible.
the rule also is not supposed to apply on uphill finishes, as today clearly was
at least this isn't like the 2011 application on stage 1 where contador was held up by a crash and finish with shleck, and somehow schleck ended up 1:15 ahead (that seemed like ASO was giving contador a time penalty for the shenanigans the previous year)