Cav only like 10 minutes off Pantani I think not bad not bad
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Remco followed and dropped Landa immediately, Landa couldn't keep up. At that point Remco just decided to set his own tempo, as did Landa. There hasn't really been any need for him.He's not riding as a domestique, is he? He finished a minute behind Evenepoel, which means he had plenty in the tank to ride his own pace and distance Almeida and Rodriguez. That means he could also have chosen to pace Evenepoel after Vingegaard's attack for a while and ride until he came to a halt, but then he would not be able to defend his own GC. He is supposed to be a good descender, but on Galibier he wasn't able to bridge to Evenepoel who was only 15s ahead. Others from his group were actually able to bridge to Evenepoel (Rodriguez, Roglic, Ayuso), but he stuck with Almeida.
You don't seem to understand. When his pace over 10km of climbing is only 1m slower than his "leader" then surely he could have dug deeper intead of riding his own pace, in order to pace Evenepoel for a few km. But after that he would blow up obviously. Hence, he is not riding as a domestique, he is riding for his own GC.Remco followed and dropped Landa immediately, Landa couldn't keep up. At that point Remco just decided to set his own tempo, as did Landa. There hasn't really been any need for him.
I would like to know Cavs time.Cav only like 10 minutes off Pantani I think not bad not bad
It doesn't really work like that, though. Landa was clearly at his limit, if he had ridden in front of Remco at a higher pace than what Remco was already doing it would have lasted like, a minute, for basically no gain. Landa would've blown up just trying to keep up with Remco trying to follow Vingegaard, lol.You don't seem to understand. When his pace over 10km of climbing is only 1m slower than his "leader" then surely he could have dug deeper intead of riding his own pace, in order to pace Evenepoel for a few km. But after that he would blow up obviously.
Think he started the climb 36-37 minutes or so behind, ended up at 51.30I would like to know Cavs time.
If he had Landa to set the tempo for the same distance as Vingegaard did for Pogacar, he could be closer to Vingegaard and not as exhausted. Even at 6-7-8% steepness and 30 km/h riding, drag plays a role.Crazy thing is it hasn't made a different either way, since Remco has actually tempo's himself well. It's probably just good psychologically to know that if you do have a bad day, then Landa will definitely be there to help. Remco hasn't used his team to pace at any point, and also hasn't had a bad day, so Landa hasn't been used as visibly. Nothing deeper than that imo
I am only complaining about Gee because I bet $10 on a website that doubled my bet for signing up!! So really lost $10!!Gee 9th, should be good to get in the breaks because he's ****ing 16 minutes behind
Facts. Darn those facts.Pantani & Co relaxed at the beginning of Plateau de Beille since Ullrich had a flat tire!
Remco would have lost significant time if that had happened, because Landa is not as good as Remco. He would have been ~90s behind Pog, and then had 5km to do on his own, and ended up more or less at the same point.If he had Landa to set the tempo for the same distance as Vingegaard did for Pogacar, he could be closer to Vingegaard and not as exhausted. Even at 6-7-8% steepness and 30 km/h riding, drag plays a role.
Yet it does work like that. Look at how Benoot, Jorgenson, etc went above their limit today and were able to drop better climbers than them. They are able to do that for more than 1 minute. Again, when Landa only loses 1m over 10k of climbing, he should have been able to pace Evenepoel quite a bit, but it would come at the expense of his own GC.It doesn't really work like that, though. Landa was clearly at his limit, if he had ridden in front of Remco at a higher pace than what Remco was already doing it would have lasted like, a minute, for basically no gain. Landa would've blown up just trying to keep up with Remco trying to follow Vingegaard, lol.
Ok, let's do this exercise. Let's imagine that a crash had taken Jonas and Pogacar down. Remco would have been leading the race by more than 5 minutes. In the process would have broken the same records that Pogacar is breaking. The question is wouldn't everyone be thinking that He was better than Vingo and Pogacar together?
LOL.
Jorgenson didn't drop anyone that unexpected lol, if Landa had to go at the pace Remco wanted to set it would've killed him.Yet it does work like that. Look at how Benoot, Jorgenson, etc went above their limit today and were able to drop better climbers than them. They are able to do that for more than 1 minute. Again, when Landa only loses 1m over 10k of climbing, he should have been able to pace Evenepoel quite a bit, but it would come at the expense of his own GC.
Nobody paced Jonas and Tadej.Yet it does work like that. Look at how Benoot, Jorgenson, etc went above their limit today and were able to drop better climbers than them. They are able to do that for more than 1 minute. Again, when Landa only loses 1m over 10k of climbing, he should have been able to pace Evenepoel quite a bit, but it would come at the expense of his own GC.
Can you back that up?Well yes the Remco fan base would have him winning 6 Tours for sure ...they do get carried away...but most people recognise Pog/Vinge are on a different level when it comes to climbing
Jorgenson dropped Almeida, Ciccone, Buitrago, Gall...Jorgenson didn't drop anyone that unexpected lol, if Landa had to go at the pace Remco wanted to set it would've killed him.
What does this have to do with anything? I am discussing the use of Landa for Evenepoel, which so far has been zilch.Nobody paced Jonas and Tadej.
Yet it does work like that. Look at how Benoot, Jorgenson, etc went above their limit today and were able to drop better climbers than them. They are able to do that for more than 1 minute. Again, when Landa only loses 1m over 10k of climbing, he should have been able to pace Evenepoel quite a bit, but it would come at the expense of his own GC.
Visma Jorgenson is not a worse climber than the names you mentioned.Jorgenson dropped Almeida, Ciccone, Buitrago, Gall...
And no, again, when Landa's pace over 10k is only 1m slower, then he definitely could have been of help in case he went over his limit instead of pacing himself for his own GC.
Clearly neither do you.And btw you dotn know how Landa helps
Look at the Remco Evenepol is the next Eddy Merckx thread...plenty of it in there that is too boring to read againCan you back that up?