It's the stage they'll have the day after Finestre, just wait and see.That is indeed a possible design.
Tour thinks it's hypothetical though
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It's the stage they'll have the day after Finestre, just wait and see.That is indeed a possible design.
Tour thinks it's hypothetical though
Iban mayo record is probably the only record who is not in trouble, unless they do a MTT on Ventoux, which i don't think will happen.
Why?If we get Alpe d'Huez, I want the stage to be as easy as possible.
I think it's actually a pretty hard climb.Another year with no Finestere?With the bombshell of disappointment, I 'd like to ask
HOW HARD CAN IT BE
If Mont ventoux is on tuesday, i think there will be a third stage on the pyrenees.La Plagne the day after AdH. And from Albertville of all things? They could have done Croix de Fer-Madeleine-La Plagne if they startet from Bourg d'Oisans or surroundings. If they start in Albertville they will be north of Madeleine. Will they then do something like Roselend and Les Arcs before La Plagne?
Anyway; right now the possible layout rumoured on Velowire is abysmal. Mur de Bretagne and Mont Dore as the only difficulties the first week. Superbagneres on the day before Peyragudes and the latter possibly as an ITT. Mont Ventoux, AdH and La Plagne the last week.
Yeah 1997 unipurito style.If we get Alpe d'Huez, I want the stage to be as easy as possible.
Ventoux they usually go pretty hard from the bottom, which is why gaps tend to blow up if there is action before Chalet Reynard.
The thing that makes Ventoux so different is that it's an extremely wind dependent climb, and I'm pretty sure that when the record got set it was more about the wind than the TT factor. The Alpe d'Huez record was set at the end of a mountain stage, not the 2004 MTT because the 90s were just that much faster. In addition, Ventoux was only visited once in the 90s, and it wasn't a MTF but a finish all the way in Carpentras.
The Ventoux record is only slightly faster than Pogacar's recent Monte Grappa record, which was a double climb during a 3 week training vacation
I see that latest rumor for that early time trial is stage 5 and supposedly it's just a 20 k inter Caen time trial. What I find interesting about this is that the rumors has been that this would be a team time trial. It seems like that would be a wasted stage, basically making this a 19 stage race. So maybe it'll be an individual time trial? I know a 20 k individual time trial won't make that much of a difference either but at least that'll be a fun early form check for general classification guys.
Gouvenou doing gouvenou things.20K
GTFO Gouvenou
TTT is probably the most stupid and wasted stage.20 km sounds more like a TTT - keep the GC close-ish. Then again it might be a ITT for the same reason.
Still the same lame duck descent and valley if you take Glandon.I don't care about if they ride Alpe d'Huez. I only wish, they finally won't approach it from the Croix de Fer. You basically can take three HC climbs before the Alpe: Galibier, Glandon, Croix de Fer. The Tour rode the Croix de Fer the last three occasions. Twice planned, once due to the Galibier being closed. Before that they chose to ride the Alpe twice.
You can't completely compare the Tour de France Femmes with the mens Tour, but Glandon created chaos. So please but the right climbs into the stage. If we wwant to see a record broken, a 4500D+ 140km stage would also do the job. Ideally with a 200+km 5000D+ queenstage the day before.
You're looking at this the wrong way - not as the Tour organizers do. It's like going to Vegas and expecting Sinatra to belt out "My Way" as the first number. The first week of the Tour is like seeing the support band at a concert.TTT is probably the most stupid and waisted stage.
If they want to do time trials, how about doing decent time trials, instead of doing waisting stages by doing individual time trials of 20 km or TTT of 20/25 km?
If they want to do proper time trials, they should do a proper ITT of 50/60 km where the differences can be high, and benefit the specialists riders on that area.
If they want to do a MTT, peyragudes is a really stupi idea, because is a short climb of 20 minutes.
They should do a MTT of 40 min effort like Alpe d'huez in 2004.
It would be better doing a MTT to superbagneres.
Yeah, it should be a viable option from that side in the future.Still the same lame duck descent and valley if you take Glandon.
What you want before Alpe d'Huez isn't a pass, it's the climb on the opposite side of the valley, which leaves only 4km of flat between the end of the descent and the start of the Alpe
![]()
I'm not sure descending through the Dutch corner is viableYeah, it should be a viable option from that side in the future.
Hmm, you got me thinking ...
![]()
Le Bourg-d'Oisans > Le Bourg-d'Oisans
180.9 km, +5630 m. Bike ride in Le Bourg-d'Oisans, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpesridewithgps.com