Tour de France stage 10: Tuesday, St-Gildas-des-Bois - Saint Malo

Page 11 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 25, 2009
403
1
0
Polza_ said:
He did in his first tweet.

Mark Cavendish ‏@MarkCavendish 2h
Not seen a replay of the final yet, but was involved in an incident with Tom Veelers. Whatever has happened, if I'm at fault, I'm sorry.

Only if he holds himself at fault. Which it doesn't really seem from his subsequent tweets.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Seeing as most people on here don't and never have raced, including me, this seems very relevant.


@Mark Cavendish
Can all sprint experts on twitter go & try flicking their bike right at 65kph without leaning your body left to balance & come back to me.


Seems he was trying to avoid him but just couldn't.
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
King Boonen said:
Seeing as most people on here don't and never have raced, including me, this seems very relevant.


@Mark Cavendish
Can all sprint experts on twitter go & try flicking their bike right at 65kph without leaning your body left to balance & come back to me.


Seems he was trying to avoid him but just couldn't.

Greg Henderson ‏@Greghenderson1 5m
Dont get me wrong. @MarkCavendish is not a crazy sprinter. Never has been, never will be. He has speed. Today was a mistake by him IMO.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Zam_Olyas said:
Greg Henderson ‏@Greghenderson1 5m
Dont get me wrong. @MarkCavendish is not a crazy sprinter. Never has been, never will be. He has speed. Today was a mistake by him IMO.

Why would what Greg Henderson has to say be relevant? From what I can see he's nowhere near the crash.
 
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
Polza_ said:
He did in his first tweet.

Mark Cavendish ‏@MarkCavendish 2h
Not seen a replay of the final yet, but was involved in an incident with Tom Veelers. Whatever has happened, if I'm at fault, I'm sorry.
"If and only if I'm at fault, I apologize" <= what a jerk!

JRanton said:
Anyway, the race jury has decided that Veelers was to blame.
:mad:
 
Jul 6, 2011
11
0
0
Cav did bad

DQ would be silly, relegated would be reasonable. The Stannard incident was not comparable, it was a crowded road and it got narrow. Cav messed up badly to knock Kittel off his bike. Cav was out of position, out of contention, and if he had to flick his bike to get around Kittel then he wasn't paying attention.
 
Aug 9, 2012
2,223
0
11,480
Looked like Cav would have taken out the Argos dude regardless. I think Cav should loose his placings, but I'm no sprinter, and I might even be a cav hater.:p
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Look381 said:
DQ would be silly, relegated would be reasonable. The Stannard incident was not comparable, it was a crowded road and it got narrow. Cav messed up badly to knock Kittel off his bike. Cav was out of position, out of contention, and if he had to flick his bike to get around Kittel then he wasn't paying attention.

You weren't paying attention, it wasn't Kittel. :rolleyes:
 
Oct 14, 2012
135
0
0
I'm amazed at some of the comments on here from armchair watchers who have probably never been involved in a real sprint either on the road or on a velodrome. Sprinting is a tough business, actions are taken in split seconds, and riders sometimes make the wrong decisions. In this case, the replays clearly show a number of things:

1. Veelers peeled off the lead out and did not make enough of an attempt to get out of the way of the following sprinters. Sure, you don't have to go off to the side, but you shouldn't slow down right in front of the others and you should make predictable movements.

2. Cavendish probably had the wrong wheel (Veelers'), realized it, then tried to get around him. At the same time, Veelers slowed and swerved to the right by about a foot (impossibly to know if this was deliberate blocking, but he did take a look at Cavendish before he did it which would lead me to believe it was an impeding move).

3. Cavendish used his exceptional track-derived handling skills to avoid going down by using his body weight and his shoulder (not his elbows, not his head) at 40 mph. This is not easy.

I'd say Veelers made the dangerous move (slowing and swerving at least a foot) - probably not malicious, but not safe. Cavendish was protecting himself from going down.
 
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
amazing that cav was even able to spot that movement by veelers at such high speed.
 
May 10, 2013
15
0
0
William H said:
Only if he holds himself at fault. Which it doesn't really seem from his subsequent tweets.

Why would you apologies if you weren't at fault? Whether he is at fault is another matter to me looks 50/50 you could blame either for different reasons.
Are biased people either way and even unbiased people will see the incident.

Greg Henderson recons it was Cavs fault Robbie McEwen that it was an accident.
 
May 25, 2009
403
1
0
Polza_ said:
Why would you apologies if you weren't at fault? Whether he is at fault is another matter to me looks 50/50 you could blame either for different reasons.
Are biased people either way and even unbiased people will see the incident.

He shouldn't apologise if he doesn't think he did anything wrong, absolutely. All I'm saying is that as it stands, he hasn't apologised

Greg Henderson recons it was Cavs fault Robbie McEwen that it was an accident.

Being an accident doesn't mean it wasn't Cav's fault. Just that there wasn't any malicious intent
 
Jul 9, 2013
1
0
0
I agree with TrackCynic. I think people are failing to really consider just how fast they were going. We're talking a guy moving over at 65kph and Cav having to both go around him and protect himself from eating asphalt. This was just an unfortunate racing accident.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Zam_Olyas said:
He was in the peloton ..eleventh.

Exactly, nowhere near it. He also didn't bad-mouth Greipel when he sent Martin flying. If you don't have a point don't try and use a random quote from someone else in an attempt to make one.
 
May 3, 2011
1,793
13
10,510
Crashes sometimes happen in sprints. This was a racing incident, nothing more, nothing less. Why does someone always have to be at fault?
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
King Boonen said:
Exactly, nowhere near it. He also didn't bad-mouth Greipel when he sent Martin flying. If you don't have a point don't try and use a random quote from someone else in an attempt to make one.

I didn't try to make a point,i just post what a pro tweeted regarding the incident.Sorry, if you don"t like it, HTFU mofo. I don't really care whether it was cavendish or Veelers fault.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,475
0
0
Look381 said:
DQ would be silly, relegated would be reasonable. The Stannard incident was not comparable, it was a crowded road and it got narrow. Cav messed up badly to knock Kittel off his bike. Cav was out of position, out of contention, and if he had to flick his bike to get around Kittel then he wasn't paying attention.

Jesus who is this guy?? he doesn't even know the result??

Yet his first instinct is to slag some guy!

FFS !!
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Zam_Olyas said:
I didn't try to make a point,i just post what a pro tweeted regarding the incident.Sorry, if you don"t like it, HTFU mofo. I don't really care whether it was cavendish or Veelers fault.

If you're not trying to make a point then why quote my post?

Or maybe you were, realised it looked ridiculous and tried to bail? Nice try flower.
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
King Boonen said:
If you're not trying to make a point then why quote my post?

Or maybe you were, realised it looked ridiculous and tried to bail? Nice try flower.

You posted a tweet by a pro and so i posted a tweet by another pro. What was ridiculous about it, sunshine?
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Zam_Olyas said:
You posted a tweet by a pro and so i posted a tweet by another pro. What was ridiculous about it, sunshine?

If you can read you can work it out, it's all there. You're boring me now though.