Tour de France Stage 4: Lorient - Mur de Bretagne - 172.5 km

Page 16 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 26, 2009
10,230
579
24,080
Do Sky always wear aero shoe covers?

They look terrible the way they go halway up their calves.
 
Jan 18, 2010
3,059
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
Wow those British Europsort commentators are horrible:eek::eek:

Beats the German TV coverage. Harmon and Kelly are OK most of the time -
I'd rather them than Phil and Paul any day of the week.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
sportzchick said:
iyou just want to change rules to spice things up - that is as contribed as your agrument right there

Yes, I want to change the rules things to spice things up, which to say, to make things more entertaining.

All rules are contrived. All rules are artificially imposed to serve certain ends. In professional cycling, which exists for the purpose of selling people things by entertaining them, making things more entertaining is a central point of the rules. Problem: Greater team organisation has destroyed the entertainment value of flat stages up until the last few km. Solution: Undermine team organisation.
 
Apr 7, 2011
4,886
439
16,580
sublimit said:
Beats the German TV coverage. Harmon and Kelly are OK most of the time -
I'd rather them than Phil and Paul any day of the week.

Didn't say the german is better. But i excpected the british ones to be a lot better.
 
Mar 11, 2009
5,841
4
0
luckyboy said:
Do Sky always wear aero shoe covers?

They look terrible the way they go halway up their calves.
I think they are rain booties. They might take them off now that it is drying out.
 
Apr 8, 2009
1,003
0
0
Zinoviev Letter said:
Yes, I want to change the rules things to spice things up, which to say, to make things more entertaining.

All rules are contrived. All rules are artificially imposed to serve certain ends. In professional cycling, which exists for the purpose of selling people things by entertaining them, making things more entertaining is a central point of the rules. Problem: Greater team organisation has destroyed the entertainment value of flat stages up until the last few km. Solution: Undermine team organisation.
they i should go and watch WWF or whatever you call it if you want it done that way...........

false entertaiment that insults the fans intellengece - nothing more nothing less

then again we let proven drug cheats back in to cycling, give them pisweak slap on the wrist penalties and cover up the rest so they think the general public is stupid anways so why stop there
 
Aug 2, 2010
1,502
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
:eek::eek::eek:
That's scary

isn't that too much? how tall is he?andy is lighter and has 1.88m. wiggans looks like skin and bones, even more than andy. i also think that he is smaller, and skinner than conti (62kg). i mean gilbert's weight is 68kg and people keep saying how muscular he is. look at wiggans.
 
Just watching the RAI coverage of the stage today and there was a side presentation on the 1949 Tour which had a time trial that passed over the Mur de Bretagne that was 139 KILOMETERS LONG.

Now that's a freakin time trial! :D
 
Apr 8, 2009
1,003
0
0
^^^^^
thats INSANE! And Im betting there were no areodyamic bikes/gear back then :D

Off topic - i so wish Tour Down Under had a time trial....that would be awesom
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Wiggins weights 4kg less than in 2009.

he looks very skinny. he could top 5 i think.
I don't think he is a good enough climber to do a podium, but he should do well in the high mountains all things considered.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
sportzchick said:
they i should go and watch WWF or whatever you call it if you want it done that way...........

false entertaiment that insults the fans intellengece - nothing more nothing less

then again we let proven drug cheats back in to cycling and cover up the rest so they think the general public is stupid anways so why stop there

This is just bizarre.

The current, complex, set of rules is no more or less artificial than the set of rules I'm proposing. The current set of rules were not handed down enscribed on stone tablets. They were made up to achieve certain ends. Over the years all kinds of things have changed. Two way radios were not always present. You used to be able to have two short stages in a day. You used to be able to have much longer stages. You used to have a different balance of time trialling to climbing. Some of these changes have led to improved racing, some have had less favourable consequences. Cycling changes.

Cycling without race radios or in smaller teams is in no sense more contrived or artificial or insulting to the intelligence than cycling with race radios or in larger teams.

Teams are smart (well, some of them). They will seek the most effective way to win within the current set of rules. Sometimes they'll be so effective at it that the effect of their ingenuity is to make the racing less exciting. When that's consistently happening it's time to unravel their best laid plans.
 
May 18, 2011
186
0
0
sportzchick said:
they i should go and watch WWF or whatever you call it if you want it done that way...........

false entertaiment that insults the fans intellengece - nothing more nothing less

then again we let proven drug cheats back in to cycling, give them pisweak slap on the wrist penalties and cover up the rest so they think the general public is stupid anways so why stop there

How is the rule that a team has 9 members any less unnatural then a rule that states a team that has less riders? Thats the point you still havent replied to...
 
Mar 11, 2009
5,841
4
0
So much for drying out, more rain and according to P&P it is pouring down at the finish.
 
Apr 8, 2009
1,003
0
0
if every stage was straight line and as flat as a pancake with perfect weather every time then sure ban radios by all means

we all know that a Tour isnt like that....
 
Aug 2, 2010
1,502
0
0
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
he looks very skinny. he could top 5 i think.
I don't think he is a good enough climber to do a podium, but he should do well in the high mountains all things considered.

andy has about the same size and is at least 1 kg lighter. when i look at wiggans i think he weights 60kg. lol

how much did he weight before being a tdf contender?
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
c&cfan said:
andy has about the same size and is at least 1 kg lighter. when i look at wiggans i think he weights 60kg. lol

how much did he weight before being a tdf contender?

i think roughly 80-85
 
Aug 2, 2010
1,502
0
0
sportzchick said:
^^^^^
thats INSANE! And Im betting there were no areodyamic bikes/gear back then :D

Off topic - i so wish Tour Down Under had a time trial....that would be awesom

whats the difference in what difficulty is concerned?
 
Apr 8, 2009
1,003
0
0
YoRUsh said:
How is the rule that a team has 9 members any less unnatural then a rule that states a team that has less riders? Thats the point you still havent replied to...
I wasnt arguing at that point - but since you brought it up

less riders in a team, means current riders having to do more workload means more crashes due to fatigue.....these guys are not having a sunday stroll in the local park you know