• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tour de Suisse 2024, June 9 - 16

Page 47 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Now that Suisse is over we can compare it with Dauphine. In my opinion this year (unlike previous years) Suisse was the higher level race. Almeida and Yates would have smashed Rogla and Jorgenson. In the top 10 of Suisse we got 10 lightweight climbers and not a Canadian rouleur and a Spanish flat domestique like in the Dauphine. :D
What do you guys think?
I think we’ll get to see all we need to know in just 2 weeks, so no need to struggle over apples and oranges comparisons.
 
I think we’ll get to see all we need to know in just 2 weeks, so no need to struggle over apples and oranges comparisons.
These posts are going to be priceless when the outcome is so obvious and predetermined to many.
Glad I didn't have money on all the injured lame race horses that ended up in the hospital after Basque country accident on April 4th. After seeing lots of fresh flyers I am not going to be surprised by a surprise!!Too many guys riding at a high level!! And as far as solid rehab and recovery.. Remco and Roglic still falling off their bikes. Amazing that part of the solid make up of UAE is not crashing!! And Del Toro fell off 2 times in 8 stages... He is not going to the TDF!!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan and xo 1
Yes, Ciccone is better than Yates because he did more W/kg!! You are always bringing this crap of comparisons. Can you see a race with proper eyes or you just rely on these w/kg estimations to assess rider performances?
 
Then, tell me why you think they were climbing better than Roglic, jorgenson and Carlitos.

Maybe i can agree in the end with you, if you tell me valid reasons on why you think that.
Maybe because Mr. Roglic, Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Jorgenson could not drop Mr. LAZKANO uphill. Or you think it will be the other way around this year in the Tour - Enric Mas will pull for Lazkano (the superclimber) on the flat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tobydawq
I am almost certain you can't find any GC rider with a smaller crash record than Almeida! Possibly in the whole history of cycling lol.
Don't jinx it!
One of those 2 wont feature high up on the gc during the Tour, gun to my head I'd say Almeida will be the 2nd gc guy.
If they are smart they let Ayuso recover from his crash and bring one of the Giro rouleurs (Bjerg or Politt) instead.
 
@Valv.Piti you don't think Jorgenson, Carlitos Rodríguez or Roglic could not drop Bernal or Ricittelo by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?

Because it was the gaps Almeida and Yates could make to them in every mountain stage on Tour suisse.

If we do the comparation between teammates, Carlitos is way better than Bernal at the moment in climbing level.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: QueenStagiaire
Like i said on the previous post. You don’t think Roglic for example could not drop Bernal by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?

Adam yates and Almeida won all of the mountain stages, by they always won by a short margin.
They finished ahead of the others more than Roglic, Jorgensen, and Rodriquez did. Maybe you’re underestimating the other riders while continuing your UAE crusade. Heaven forbid Vingegaard wins by 3 mins but he hasn’t so far this year.
If we take how the CdD went and take his shape each stage and put it here, no because he cracked on the last stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
They finished ahead of the others more than Roglic, Jorgensen, and Rodriquez did. Maybe you’re underestimating the other riders while continuing your UAE crusade. Heaven forbid Vingegaard wins by 3 mins but he hasn’t so far this year.
If we take how the CdD went and take his shape each stage and put it here, no because he cracked on the last stage.

you dont think Roglic could've outclimbed a group of Kelderman, Onley, Pidcock and Skjelmose? lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
That’s not what was said.

"the finished ahead of the others"? those are the 'others'

Roglic cracked on the last stage because of the crashes. the Dauphine stages were also much harder. two of the stages in this race were a joke length and the other two were one climb summit finishes (of which the most comparable one with a Dauphine climb, Roglic still did better numbers).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Like i said on the previous post. You don’t think Roglic for example could not drop Bernal by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?
If we take how the CdD went and take his shape each stage and put it here, no because he cracked on the last stage.
you mean the post where you didn't answer the question posed? I figured i would just ignore it too, but just for kicks, let's revisit it. do you think Roglic could've outclimbed Bernal by 10-20 seconds?

What’s the keyword in Froome’s post?
 
so you think Bernal would've climbed with Jorgenson and Rodriguez then? because he didn't do anywhere near close to the numbers those two did on that stage in this race. he would've been with Remco on that last stage.
I think Bernal wouldn’t have been 10/20s behind Roglic. Which means Roglic wouldn’t drop Bernal by 10/20s in every mountain stage.

And to the first point, the response was why Almeida and Adam looked more impressive compared with Roglic. Roglic was sprint, sprint, dropped. Almeida and Adam took over and attacked the others.

I also think Roglic can’t be fairly judged due to the crash, which is why I said if we take how each stage went. But if he’s swapped with UAE, Roglic most certainly wins TdS and one of UAE wins CdD.

[content deleted]
 
Last edited by a moderator: