I am almost certain you can't find any GC rider with a smaller crash record than Almeida! Possibly in the whole history of cycling lol.Of course, I’d they’d been in the Dauphine, they might have crashed like Rog and Remco.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I am almost certain you can't find any GC rider with a smaller crash record than Almeida! Possibly in the whole history of cycling lol.Of course, I’d they’d been in the Dauphine, they might have crashed like Rog and Remco.
I think we’ll get to see all we need to know in just 2 weeks, so no need to struggle over apples and oranges comparisons.Now that Suisse is over we can compare it with Dauphine. In my opinion this year (unlike previous years) Suisse was the higher level race. Almeida and Yates would have smashed Rogla and Jorgenson. In the top 10 of Suisse we got 10 lightweight climbers and not a Canadian rouleur and a Spanish flat domestique like in the Dauphine.
What do you guys think?
View: https://x.com/WattsinCycling/status/1799123122223800828No it is not, lmao??? XD
Suisse climbing level was obviousy higher, even my deaf, blind and numb grandma can tell you that.
Exactly the same.But not when Teddy beats farmers by 10 minutes, right?
Who said that btw? I've been wondering ever since you started making these comments if this is a reference to me claiming the "switching to team UAE" effect is overrated, but it surely isn't, right?4 consecutive 1-2s since they told me UAE weren't the highest performing team in the world
These posts are going to be priceless when the outcome is so obvious and predetermined to many.I think we’ll get to see all we need to know in just 2 weeks, so no need to struggle over apples and oranges comparisons.
Yes, Ciccone is better than Yates because he did more W/kg!! You are always bringing this crap of comparisons. Can you see a race with proper eyes or you just rely on these w/kg estimations to assess rider performances?View: https://x.com/WattsinCycling/status/1799123122223800828
View: https://x.com/WattsinCycling/status/1801298479807139884
It was "higher level" in stages with 40 km ....but the reason for that is quite obvious.
The only thing at this point important to Froome is did he have same financial advice team as Sir Bradley Wiggins..Its painfully obvious to everyone that Yates and Almeida was climbing better than any other riders in both races. Apart from our guy Froome
Trying to figure out why Vingegaard didn’t put as much time into Bernal.Its painfully obvious to everyone that Yates and Almeida was climbing better than any other riders in both races. Apart from our guy Froome
Then, tell me why you think they were climbing better than Roglic, jorgenson and Carlitos.Its painfully obvious to everyone that Yates and Almeida was climbing better than any other riders in both races. Apart from our guy Froome
Because they did it for 5 stages, 4 of which they went 1 and 2.Then, tell me why you think they were climbing better than Roglic, jorgenson and Carlitos.
Maybe i can agree in the end with you, if you tell me valid reasons on why you think that.
Maybe because Mr. Roglic, Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Jorgenson could not drop Mr. LAZKANO uphill. Or you think it will be the other way around this year in the Tour - Enric Mas will pull for Lazkano (the superclimber) on the flat.Then, tell me why you think they were climbing better than Roglic, jorgenson and Carlitos.
Maybe i can agree in the end with you, if you tell me valid reasons on why you think that.
Don't jinx it!I am almost certain you can't find any GC rider with a smaller crash record than Almeida! Possibly in the whole history of cycling lol.
Like i said on the previous post. You don’t think Roglic for example could not drop Bernal by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?Because they did it for 5 stages, 4 of which they went 1 and 2.
They finished ahead of the others more than Roglic, Jorgensen, and Rodriquez did. Maybe you’re underestimating the other riders while continuing your UAE crusade. Heaven forbid Vingegaard wins by 3 mins but he hasn’t so far this year.Like i said on the previous post. You don’t think Roglic for example could not drop Bernal by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?
Adam yates and Almeida won all of the mountain stages, by they always won by a short margin.
They finished ahead of the others more than Roglic, Jorgensen, and Rodriquez did. Maybe you’re underestimating the other riders while continuing your UAE crusade. Heaven forbid Vingegaard wins by 3 mins but he hasn’t so far this year.
If we take how the CdD went and take his shape each stage and put it here, no because he cracked on the last stage.
That’s not what was said. Skjelmose has also done something Roglic hasn’t done and beat him the last time they raced. lolyou dont think Roglic could've outclimbed a group of Kelderman, Onley, Pidcock and Skjelmose? lol
That’s not what was said.
And go read what I replied to."the finished ahead of the others"? those are the 'others'
And go read what I replied to.
Like i said on the previous post. You don’t think Roglic for example could not drop Bernal by 10/20 s in every mountain stage?
If we take how the CdD went and take his shape each stage and put it here, no because he cracked on the last stage.
you mean the post where you didn't answer the question posed? I figured i would just ignore it too, but just for kicks, let's revisit it. do you think Roglic could've outclimbed Bernal by 10-20 seconds?
I think Bernal wouldn’t have been 10/20s behind Roglic. Which means Roglic wouldn’t drop Bernal by 10/20s in every mountain stage.so you think Bernal would've climbed with Jorgenson and Rodriguez then? because he didn't do anywhere near close to the numbers those two did on that stage in this race. he would've been with Remco on that last stage.