Lanark said:
True, his stage win in the Dauphiné was on a short steep hill as well, and in the Vuelta his best stage result was to San Lorenzo de El Escorial. He is not a Rodriguez, but he can handle the steep stuff and tempo changes really well. In the 2010 Tour he probably suffered the most on the Madeleine and Tourmalet.
In the 2010 TDF Van den Broeck suffered most from both rest days, as usual. Madeleine and Tourmalet just happened to be in the stages right after the rest days.
theyoungest said:
Actually, VDB is quite good at explosive stuff... it's on the really long climbs that he starts to struggle. Remember his attack on Mende? Or on the Mur de Bretagne? Both times Gesink was struggling at the back.
I think that's how you're willing to look at it. He's good at dealing with tempochanges yes, but he isn't good at making an attack, getting out of the saddle and blast off for 300 meters like Rodriguez, Contador, Schleck... He just has some way of applying the same climbing style even on much steeper climbs without getting into trouble (as opposed to other riders who do get into trouble). But rarely is it a showcase of explosiveness. I used to joke about it with my brother about when he placed an attack (out of the saddle), then looked behind himself and noticed he barely got a meter on the first chaser who actually didn't do anything but follow his own tempo.
As for Gesink, he's been up there with JvdB in this TDF on all the short steep climbs so far. Usually finished in front. Also, wasn't it his ambition to do well in AGR and LBL? How would you explain that for a rider who needs long climbs and suffers the first K's?