The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I have spotted multiple cars, in all kinds of colours!
But the outcome has been quite predictable.I have no problem with the way QuickStep rode this. Give a bone to Alaphilippe in a 2.Pro race, and chances are, it was probably the idea of Remco too.
Sure, but does that matter?But the outcome has been quite predictable.
They could also have tried to throw the bone to Magnier, to whom a 2.Pro is infinitely more meaningful than Alaphilippe, instead of making the race hard themselves. And if things had split anyway, they could have kept both Evenepoel and Gelders fresh for the finale rather than singlehandedly driving the group.I have no problem with the way QuickStep rode this. Give a bone to Alaphilippe, the man who has won this team so much, in a 2.Pro race, and chances are, it was probably the idea of Remco too.
They wanted a last swan song for Alaphilippe probably, in a race where it's possible to actually win because that ain't happening in Canada. Unfortunately he's still able to f*** it upThey could also have tried to throw the bone to Magnier, to whom a 2.Pro is infinitely more meaningful than Alaphilippe, instead of making the race hard themselves. And if things had split anyway, they could have kept both Evenepoel and Gelders fresh for the finale rather than singlehandedly driving the group.
Magnier was already suffering hard on Ugglebarnby Moo when INEOS were still a factor in this race.They could also have tried to throw the bone to Magnier, to whom a 2.Pro is infinitely more meaningful than Alaphilippe, instead of making the race hard themselves. And if things had split anyway, they could have kept both Evenepoel and Gelders fresh for the finale rather than singlehandedly driving the group.
Well, it does if they wanted to win. Evenepoel riding for Alaphilippe has always ended in disappointment (by Alaphilippe).Sure, but does that matter?
It seemeth QuickStep has not marked the Tour of Britain as a make or break, must win race, of which I must agree with.Well, it does if they wanted to win. Evenepoel riding for Alaphilippe has always ended in disappointment (by Alaphilippe).
Evenepoel thinks Alaphilippe is in better shape than him. Lol.
It seemeth QuickStep has not marked the Tour of Britain as a make or break, must win race, of which I must agree with.
My god somebody posting common sense . You would think the team was about to fold if they didn't win stage 2 of the Britain tour based on all the comments aboveBit of an overreaction in here. Alaphilippe has been on a lot of domestique duties over the years and mostly been a good servant. Totally fine to switch it around in an irrelevant mickey mouse (or better Peppa Pig) race and also not too unreasonable given that Alas sprint on a flat finish like that is probably slightly better than Evenepoel.
Don't think Remco really cares, this is just a build up for worlds anyway.
Ineos the real failure in here, in recent years they've used their home race to make up for TdF or ongoing Vuelta failures, now they can't even slap around the local farmers with a full strength line up.
But Remco said before the start of Tour of Britain that he's mostly looking for a hard race, and use that as a training method for the coming weeks. So based on that it would make sense to ride like this, otherwise he could've stayed in Calpe and just keep riding at a decent pace.Maybe, but was this the best way to win with Julian? I think letting Remco attack multiple times instead of pacing for a while just sacrificing himself why Israel had to do absolutely nothing would've probably been the best for Alaphilippe too.