- Jun 22, 2009
- 10,644
- 2
- 0
El Pistolero said:As if Gesink is a proven winner in important races. Publicity wise obviously Gesink is a lot more important, but that doesn't make him the best cyclist.
That's not my point.
In the cobbles, which is Matti's main focus I suppose, his best performance in the big races is 6th @ flanders.
Not winnig necessary, but overall results and promise in fields.
Sure he has done good in a few semi-classics, but so has gesink.
Gesink also performs in the stage races (2 podiums in big WC races this year), has bigger results in the main classics (ardennes vs cobbles obv.) despite it not being his main focus. Gesink also has GT results, and shows more promise of growth then matti. Not to mention (again), the biggest goal for rabo is directed around Gesink GC.
We all know you dislike dutch riders, but if you think matti is the better cyclist you are more ignorant then I thought(trust me that is saying a lot).
LOL HAI Adam Blythe is argubley the best rider at lotto.
