• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

UCI Road World Championships 21st-29th September 2019 - Yorkshire - Race Thread.

Page 41 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Indeed a ludicrous comment especially when you consider that the decision was taken by a non “Anglo” video reviewer. Have to say that Higuita made a monumental effort to get back on to the breakaway by the last 1 kilometre and paid for it in the sprint. Fitting the podium came from the lead breakaway in the end.

Am in Harrogate this weekend. The weather his morning continues to be wet. Heavy rain at the moment but forecast to dry up for the start of the ladies elite road race.
 
I think both sides have to take the blame here. I find it hard to believe that the DS and the rider didn't know the rules they broke, maybe they thought they would get away with it being so far out. Also the UCI needs to be more consistent when it comes to drafting/getting a pull/push etc. A rule is a rule. As for the post which mentioned the Anglo's trying to get one of their boys on the podium (joke or not), the Vuelta have been trying for years to get Valverde on the top spot, next year 21 stages of La Fleche Wallonne? :D
 
I think both sides have to take the blame here. I find it hard to believe that the DS and the rider didn't know the rules they broke, maybe they thought they would get away with it being so far out. Also the UCI needs to be more consistent when it comes to drafting/getting a pull/push etc. A rule is a rule. As for the post which mentioned the Anglo's trying to get one of their boys on the podium (joke or not), the Vuelta have been trying for years to get Valverde on the top spot, next year 21 stages of La Fleche Wallonne? :D
Julian Alaphilippe says he likes this idea.
 
You mean, in general - that winning after the disqualification of an opponent is a bad thing? Or is it because the jury's decision in this case is unpopular?

Oscar Pereiro won the Tour de France after Landis was stripped of his victory. I've never felt pity for Pereiro because of that.

Partly because of the importance of the race.
Partly because of the crime. As KB pointed out; Landis was doped!
And, yes, partly because it was unpopular; what I'm fearing is that some people might take it out on Battistella, even though he had nothing to do with it.

---
Right, so... with the new information, maybe it was the right decision, and maybe they really couldn't make the call immediately, but that makes me wonder; if it was being filmed, but not broadcast (my understanding is that it was part of the footage that for - whatever reason - isn't being shown live), why not instantly make the footage available for the public? And also, maybe producers should have some kind of course in what's important/necessary to show.
 
So, the women are up today. In truth, I think it's hard to say anybody not wearing the orange of the Netherlands is a five star favourite, but the course does offer a few places where people can escape, and as we know, the Dutch team has managed to completely flunk opportunities like this in the past, such as Baku and Richmond, of course, though they've been a bit better at maximising their opportunities in these races more recently.

Their team is super-strong top-down and literally all eight riders could potentially win; obviously, however, they will settle on various roles during the race, and should be able to put somebody in pretty much every move. Marianne Vos is surely the favourite given the season she has had, but as we know from her reign of terror in the late 00s and early 10s, this often opens the door up for others when opposition riders don't want to pull Marianne along. Chantal Blaak's 2017 triumph was built in similar fashion, and she is similarly poised today, along with Amy Pieters, Floortje Mackaij, Lucinda Brand and World Championships débutante Demi Vollering, who on paper would likely be the engine room of the team, with Brand perhaps the best positioned of the quintet to take advantage of the péloton's reluctance to offer a free ride to van der Breggen, van Vleuten and Vos - though any of them are capable.

The first major opponent I would throw into the ring is Lizzie Deignan. As is well known, I am not a fan of hers, but these are her home roads, and clearly the British team has been set up specifically with Lizzie winning in mind, so there is no real potential for disunity of goals. She got her excuses in early in the Women's Tour before realising she didn't actually need them, but since that win she has lain low, focusing entirely on these World Championships, and we know that if she hits them with the kind of form she had earlier in the season, let alone the form she had for eighteen months in 2015-16 prior to the whole silent ban/Olympics issue which, regardless of the Clinic implications, was rather revelatory in terms of showing how the bunch perceives her and seemingly shook her confidence a bit, then she's a definite prospect for victory.

Team America also has a potential favourite in Coryn Rivera. The fact that a lot of the climbs on the circuit are short digs isn't ideal for her, but she arrives in very good form having won the last two stages of the Tour of Belgium, including the Geraardsbergen one, and stages like the Altenburg stage of Thüringen or Halden in the Tour of Norway, where she was the nearest thing to a competitor Vos had on a punchy-type finish, mean that with that slightly uphill dig to the line, she is a very good threat. The problem for the Americans is that they'll likely need to expend some energy on race controlling to get her there, and that would mean probably taking her to the line with Vos, which is a risky gambit given the season Vos has been having. The course is probably not hilly enough to make Hall a favourite, with her lack of sprint weapon and having needed longer climbs to come to the fore (as opposed to other non-sprinty climby types with a strong record in short punchy climbs, like Longo Borghini or Niewiadoma), but I've been wrong before plenty of times. Tayler Wiles is probably the Americans' best wildcard, although what Chloe Dygert-Owen can do on her TT form, Lord only knows - the issue will be that she doesn't have too much in the way of experience dealing with a pack of this strength.

Italy offer a number of interesting options, and I think from a team perspective will be the biggest challengers to the Dutch. Marta Bastianelli is the obvious leader, though her late-season form has struggled unsurprisingly to match her incredible run of results in the spring. Nevertheless, if she arrives in something approximating her Ronde van Vlaanderen form, the hilly riders are going to have to be insanely aggressive to get rid of her. However, if they are that aggressive and succeed, Italy have a very reasonable plan B in the form of Soraya Paladin, who just finished 2nd and 1st - with three stage wins - in the two Italian Worlds tune-up races. Soraya has a good sprint, especially on a short uphill dig, and has a truckload of strong placements on hilly courses during the year, including 7 of the 10 stages in the Giro in the top 10, the podium of Emakumeen Bira, the top 10 of La Course, and the podium on similar roads to this in the Tour of Yorkshire. However, with Balsamo and Paternoster also in the team - inexperienced riders but strong sprinters - it seems that the expectation is for Marta to be plan A, and so Paladin, Longo Borghini and Cecchini are liable to be subsumed to that goal, though I would hope they have the freedom to mark moves and try to disrupt the Dutch gameplans.

Australia are another 7-rider team, and they have what looks like a strong team on paper, but at the same time I'm not convinced they have any outcome where they would have the outright favourite - Spratt is a very good climber, world class indeed, but she is liable to be outkicked at the line by some of the others who would still be there with her in my expectations; Kennedy is a good climber, durable and a good gambler, but she's also liable to terrible luck and had that heartache of a finish in the Giro that she'll need to put from her mind; Tiffany Cromwell has had a quiet season by her standards, and Chloe Hosking is very quick and is pretty durable but I'm not sure I'd back her over the likes of Vos and Rivera, who I'd expect to hold on to the bunch at least as long as her, on this finish.

Germany, by contrast, have just 6 but have been inserted into the top dossard numbers, with Lisa Brennauer as the nominal leader. She went well in the Tour of Britain and won the GP Elsy Jacobs after WNT did a brilliant job of exposing the naïveté in race control of Parkhotel Valkenburg and Vollering, but you'd say that while Brennauer won the Madrid Challenge, it's more because of the TT, and that's been and gone. Her kid sister, Brennauer II, i.e. Lisa Klein (I often conflate the two riders as they are both Germans named Lisa, and have almost identical skillsets, strong TT engines with limited but decent durability and a very strong sprint at the end of a slightly hilly race, to the point of being competitive in outright bunch sprints from time to time) would seem a stronger possibility, arriving in very good form after winning the Boels Rentals Ladies Tour; the team does have an interesting wildcard in Liane Lippert, however; the 21-year-old just finished 5th in the Tour of Belgium, and was one of the strongest riders until a jour sans in the Women's Tour back in June, even threatening to win the race at one point, over the short sharp Burton Dassett climb where she finished 2nd behind Niewiadoma.

Speaking of the combative Pole, she will be the obvious leader of the Polish squadron, who are, largely thanks to her and to a lesser extent Małgorzata Jasińska, also a team of seven, and they will want the race to be as hard as possible, so expect to see the two lighting up the hills if they have the form, because neither can sprint and both require a very broken up race to medal. The good news is that both of them are not shy about trying to attack, so the Polish jerseys should at least be highly visible. The same goes, to a lesser extent, for the Spanish team - they don't really have an A-level leader like a Niewiadoma, but they also don't have anybody who is likely to win from a sizable bunch, and their strongest riders are climbers, so they will have to animate the race to burn off as many people as possible to have any opportunities. The course is almost certainly not tough enough to bring Santesteban or Merino into contention for the medals, but Mavi García did finish on the podium of the Tour of Yorkshire back in the spring.

The strongest of the teams of 5 will be Denmark, comfortably. They boast the 2016 World Champion in Amalie Dideriksen, and while she hasn't had the strongest of seasons, she hadn't in 2016 either - depending on how this race is run, however, she is likely to have to subsume her goals to those of your heroine and mine, the one, the only, the much-loved and rightly so, queen of the interview and romantic swashbuckling heroine of the péloton, Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig. We all know that everybody in their right mind wants to see Cille on the podium, because even if you don't like her (if there is anybody that doesn't like her, please can you identify yourselves now, so that you can be roundly mocked, shunned and made a pariah), Cille + medal will lead to Cille + microphone, and it is a universal truth of professional cycling that Cille + Microphone = Gold.

On other smaller teams there remain some other interesting names, and the most obvious, as ever, is Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio. The South African grimpeuse has only three teammates with her, but she's one of the péloton's greatest climbers at the moment, and she has a very quick finish for a climber, so if the race becomes broken up and more selective than anticipated, she is definitely in the frame to take even the entirety of the spoils, though before we get too carried away it is worth noting that she's only won 3 races this year - the national championships road race, the All-Africa Games ITT and a Spanish one-day race which featured the San Miguel de Áralar climb, so isn't really reflective of this kind of course. However, she's spent much of the season setting up Marianne Vos on courses like this, so not only has she not had the chance to fight these fights for her own goals, but she also will know a bit more about Marianne's strengths (everything) and weaknesses (none) than most. Christine Majerus will also be of interest as this is the kind of terrain that she loves - too tough for the pure sprinters much of the time, not tough enough to truly be a climber's playground, and with her cyclocross origins, she is more adept at those short sharp bursts of acceleration on the little leg-breakers than most - her problem will be running out of helpers as Luxembourg only have three starters including herself. Similarly Arlenis Sierra only has one Cuban compatriot in the race, after finally finding some form in the last few weeks, winning the Giro della Toscana.

Belgium are without Jolien d'Hoore or Lotte Kopecky, so their de facto leader becomes Sofie de Vuyst, who has had a career season in fairness. However, she has a good head for this kind of race - she won Brabantse Pijl - and she arrives in good form. Do I think she'll podium? Probably not, but she has an outside shot at it with the team focusing on her. Norway are also an interesting team with Susanne Andersen liking this kind of terrain, and Stine Andersen Borgli on a career season that has seen her join the top rank from next year on. Katrine Aalerud is too much of a climber for this course, but that's a decently interesting team. Their Nordic neighbours, Sweden, would on paper be quite interesting, however Emilia Fahlin, who would otherwise have been a strong wildcard possibility on a course like this, missed a load of racing time mid-season after a severe concussion and went four months off the road, only returning recently, so won't be her usual self, while Hanna Nilsson, like Aalerud, probably is their best outside shot, and she needs a harder course and a tough race pace to burn off the rouleuses.

The similarity in profile to Bréton races may help the French, who have versatile and lovable Bréton road captain Audrey Cordon-Ragot to guide them, but while she's liable to be very visible due to her combative and gutsy baroudeuse riding style, her lack of a sprint weapon often hamstrings her when we get to the business end of the event. Juliette Labous is probably the most interesting member of the French team on paper, though Biannic can sprint and Evita Muzic went through a string of U23 classification wins earlier in the year too. Eugenia Bujak is leading the Slovene team now, rather than being a third bullet in Poland's gun, and that does mean that she won't get the same support as had she still raced for Poland, but simultaneously she won't see her goals subsumed to those of Kasia or Gosia; she did win the GP Plouay a couple of years ago so can't be underestimated, but the lack of team support and a quiet season will probably hold her back. Likewise Amialiusik, who won that Baku race when the Dutch committed tactical seppuku - however following a string of injuries she doesn't seem quite the rider she was four years ago and while she's still a strong hand, I can't say that she will really be considered a threat to win from the majority of compositions of any breakaway or attack group. Russia are unpredictable - on paper this course should suit Chursina and she's a very decent rider indeed, while Novolodskaya is a very strong young prospect, but they tend to get their results in middling fields rather than against the world's elite. Finally, Rasa Leleivyte is foraging alone and this is the kind of course that suits her - but foraging alone on this kind of course will be an absolute nightmare once racing is on because getting to and from the team car and getting back without there being any moves that you need to decide whether you should follow or not is a challenge, and so being there at the business end of proceedings will require not just the legs but a good deal of luck too - in the Olympics with the tiny péloton that's not so bad, but with 150+ riders in the Worlds, that's another question.
 
The problem here is, that the DS was simply pushing his luck, it seems. Yes, we all know "it happens". Drafting is done all the time after a crash or a mechanical. But for two minutes, and supposedly (from what i read on other forums, like Wielerflits) at speeds of 100km/h... sorry, then you simply are taking advantage and you KNOW the UCI can't let that slide, because if they do, then everybody will do it. Instead of 30 seconds at 70km/h, everybody will be going 100 for 2 minutes; and why stop there.

So the main culprit here seems to be the DS, who didn't really know there are rules that regulate this behaviour. Not Eekhoff. So i'm gutted for this kid, but fck that guy behind the wheel of that car who should have known better.
No no, the problem is, if they noticed that, they should have DSQ-ed him immediately.

Not let him ride on, influence the race and even win it.
It also meant that Higuita and Kron could come back, because Eekhoff did the strongest pulls. This also changed the dynamic of the lead group in the final hunderd meters. So all in all this hugely influenced the result.

If the UCI wants to set an example or do something right, they should have taken immediately action. They ruined it by not doing that and then DSQ-ing after.
That's a big mistake, if you don't DSQ immediately, then you left your chance I'd say.
 
What gets me is every single cyclist's attitude that drafting and motorpacing are natural inalienable rights after a crash. I have my reservations about how this was enforced in this particular case but IMO it would be great if we could start next season with a clean slate and enforce this rule seriously and uncompromisingly.
The overwhelming precedent is right there. Either you use it or you fall behind. 99% of cases you get punished for following the rule, hence nobody does it.

If you want to start applying the rule, this is the worst way to do so. It's less than a month ago te UCI explicitly allowed this to affect the Vuelta. It's likely we'll see more of this today and tomorrow and that those riders won't be disqualified.

I think it's worse to inconsistently apply a rule than to not apply it in cases like these.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Axel Hangleck
So, the women are up today. In truth, I think it's hard to say anybody not wearing the orange of the Netherlands is a five star favourite, but the course does offer a few places where people can escape, and as we know, the Dutch team has managed to completely flunk opportunities like this in the past, such as Baku and Richmond, of course, though they've been a bit better at maximising their opportunities in these races more recently.

Their team is super-strong top-down and literally all eight riders could potentially win; obviously, however, they will settle on various roles during the race, and should be able to put somebody in pretty much every move. Marianne Vos is surely the favourite given the season she has had, but as we know from her reign of terror in the late 00s and early 10s, this often opens the door up for others when opposition riders don't want to pull Marianne along. Chantal Blaak's 2017 triumph was built in similar fashion, and she is similarly poised today, along with Amy Pieters, Floortje Mackaij, Lucinda Brand and World Championships débutante Demi Vollering, who on paper would likely be the engine room of the team, with Brand perhaps the best positioned of the quintet to take advantage of the péloton's reluctance to offer a free ride to van der Breggen, van Vleuten and Vos - though any of them are capable.

The first major opponent I would throw into the ring is Lizzie Deignan. As is well known, I am not a fan of hers, but these are her home roads, and clearly the British team has been set up specifically with Lizzie winning in mind, so there is no real potential for disunity of goals. She got her excuses in early in the Women's Tour before realising she didn't actually need them, but since that win she has lain low, focusing entirely on these World Championships, and we know that if she hits them with the kind of form she had earlier in the season, let alone the form she had for eighteen months in 2015-16 prior to the whole silent ban/Olympics issue which, regardless of the Clinic implications, was rather revelatory in terms of showing how the bunch perceives her and seemingly shook her confidence a bit, then she's a definite prospect for victory.

Team America also has a potential favourite in Coryn Rivera. The fact that a lot of the climbs on the circuit are short digs isn't ideal for her, but she arrives in very good form having won the last two stages of the Tour of Belgium, including the Geraardsbergen one, and stages like the Altenburg stage of Thüringen or Halden in the Tour of Norway, where she was the nearest thing to a competitor Vos had on a punchy-type finish, mean that with that slightly uphill dig to the line, she is a very good threat. The problem for the Americans is that they'll likely need to expend some energy on race controlling to get her there, and that would mean probably taking her to the line with Vos, which is a risky gambit given the season Vos has been having. The course is probably not hilly enough to make Hall a favourite, with her lack of sprint weapon and having needed longer climbs to come to the fore (as opposed to other non-sprinty climby types with a strong record in short punchy climbs, like Longo Borghini or Niewiadoma), but I've been wrong before plenty of times. Tayler Wiles is probably the Americans' best wildcard, although what Chloe Dygert-Owen can do on her TT form, Lord only knows - the issue will be that she doesn't have too much in the way of experience dealing with a pack of this strength.

Italy offer a number of interesting options, and I think from a team perspective will be the biggest challengers to the Dutch. Marta Bastianelli is the obvious leader, though her late-season form has struggled unsurprisingly to match her incredible run of results in the spring. Nevertheless, if she arrives in something approximating her Ronde van Vlaanderen form, the hilly riders are going to have to be insanely aggressive to get rid of her. However, if they are that aggressive and succeed, Italy have a very reasonable plan B in the form of Soraya Paladin, who just finished 2nd and 1st - with three stage wins - in the two Italian Worlds tune-up races. Soraya has a good sprint, especially on a short uphill dig, and has a truckload of strong placements on hilly courses during the year, including 7 of the 10 stages in the Giro in the top 10, the podium of Emakumeen Bira, the top 10 of La Course, and the podium on similar roads to this in the Tour of Yorkshire. However, with Balsamo and Paternoster also in the team - inexperienced riders but strong sprinters - it seems that the expectation is for Marta to be plan A, and so Paladin, Longo Borghini and Cecchini are liable to be subsumed to that goal, though I would hope they have the freedom to mark moves and try to disrupt the Dutch gameplans.

Australia are another 7-rider team, and they have what looks like a strong team on paper, but at the same time I'm not convinced they have any outcome where they would have the outright favourite - Spratt is a very good climber, world class indeed, but she is liable to be outkicked at the line by some of the others who would still be there with her in my expectations; Kennedy is a good climber, durable and a good gambler, but she's also liable to terrible luck and had that heartache of a finish in the Giro that she'll need to put from her mind; Tiffany Cromwell has had a quiet season by her standards, and Chloe Hosking is very quick and is pretty durable but I'm not sure I'd back her over the likes of Vos and Rivera, who I'd expect to hold on to the bunch at least as long as her, on this finish.

Germany, by contrast, have just 6 but have been inserted into the top dossard numbers, with Lisa Brennauer as the nominal leader. She went well in the Tour of Britain and won the GP Elsy Jacobs after WNT did a brilliant job of exposing the naïveté in race control of Parkhotel Valkenburg and Vollering, but you'd say that while Brennauer won the Madrid Challenge, it's more because of the TT, and that's been and gone. Her kid sister, Brennauer II, i.e. Lisa Klein (I often conflate the two riders as they are both Germans named Lisa, and have almost identical skillsets, strong TT engines with limited but decent durability and a very strong sprint at the end of a slightly hilly race, to the point of being competitive in outright bunch sprints from time to time) would seem a stronger possibility, arriving in very good form after winning the Boels Rentals Ladies Tour; the team does have an interesting wildcard in Liane Lippert, however; the 21-year-old just finished 5th in the Tour of Belgium, and was one of the strongest riders until a jour sans in the Women's Tour back in June, even threatening to win the race at one point, over the short sharp Burton Dassett climb where she finished 2nd behind Niewiadoma.

Speaking of the combative Pole, she will be the obvious leader of the Polish squadron, who are, largely thanks to her and to a lesser extent Małgorzata Jasińska, also a team of seven, and they will want the race to be as hard as possible, so expect to see the two lighting up the hills if they have the form, because neither can sprint and both require a very broken up race to medal. The good news is that both of them are not shy about trying to attack, so the Polish jerseys should at least be highly visible. The same goes, to a lesser extent, for the Spanish team - they don't really have an A-level leader like a Niewiadoma, but they also don't have anybody who is likely to win from a sizable bunch, and their strongest riders are climbers, so they will have to animate the race to burn off as many people as possible to have any opportunities. The course is almost certainly not tough enough to bring Santesteban or Merino into contention for the medals, but Mavi García did finish on the podium of the Tour of Yorkshire back in the spring.

The strongest of the teams of 5 will be Denmark, comfortably. They boast the 2016 World Champion in Amalie Dideriksen, and while she hasn't had the strongest of seasons, she hadn't in 2016 either - depending on how this race is run, however, she is likely to have to subsume her goals to those of your heroine and mine, the one, the only, the much-loved and rightly so, queen of the interview and romantic swashbuckling heroine of the péloton, Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig. We all know that everybody in their right mind wants to see Cille on the podium, because even if you don't like her (if there is anybody that doesn't like her, please can you identify yourselves now, so that you can be roundly mocked, shunned and made a pariah), Cille + medal will lead to Cille + microphone, and it is a universal truth of professional cycling that Cille + Microphone = Gold.

On other smaller teams there remain some other interesting names, and the most obvious, as ever, is Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio. The South African grimpeuse has only three teammates with her, but she's one of the péloton's greatest climbers at the moment, and she has a very quick finish for a climber, so if the race becomes broken up and more selective than anticipated, she is definitely in the frame to take even the entirety of the spoils, though before we get too carried away it is worth noting that she's only won 3 races this year - the national championships road race, the All-Africa Games ITT and a Spanish one-day race which featured the San Miguel de Áralar climb, so isn't really reflective of this kind of course. However, she's spent much of the season setting up Marianne Vos on courses like this, so not only has she not had the chance to fight these fights for her own goals, but she also will know a bit more about Marianne's strengths (everything) and weaknesses (none) than most. Christine Majerus will also be of interest as this is the kind of terrain that she loves - too tough for the pure sprinters much of the time, not tough enough to truly be a climber's playground, and with her cyclocross origins, she is more adept at those short sharp bursts of acceleration on the little leg-breakers than most - her problem will be running out of helpers as Luxembourg only have three starters including herself. Similarly Arlenis Sierra only has one Cuban compatriot in the race, after finally finding some form in the last few weeks, winning the Giro della Toscana.

Belgium are without Jolien d'Hoore or Lotte Kopecky, so their de facto leader becomes Sofie de Vuyst, who has had a career season in fairness. However, she has a good head for this kind of race - she won Brabantse Pijl - and she arrives in good form. Do I think she'll podium? Probably not, but she has an outside shot at it with the team focusing on her. Norway are also an interesting team with Susanne Andersen liking this kind of terrain, and Stine Andersen Borgli on a career season that has seen her join the top rank from next year on. Katrine Aalerud is too much of a climber for this course, but that's a decently interesting team. Their Nordic neighbours, Sweden, would on paper be quite interesting, however Emilia Fahlin, who would otherwise have been a strong wildcard possibility on a course like this, missed a load of racing time mid-season after a severe concussion and went four months off the road, only returning recently, so won't be her usual self, while Hanna Nilsson, like Aalerud, probably is their best outside shot, and she needs a harder course and a tough race pace to burn off the rouleuses.

The similarity in profile to Bréton races may help the French, who have versatile and lovable Bréton road captain Audrey Cordon-Ragot to guide them, but while she's liable to be very visible due to her combative and gutsy baroudeuse riding style, her lack of a sprint weapon often hamstrings her when we get to the business end of the event. Juliette Labous is probably the most interesting member of the French team on paper, though Biannic can sprint and Evita Muzic went through a string of U23 classification wins earlier in the year too. Eugenia Bujak is leading the Slovene team now, rather than being a third bullet in Poland's gun, and that does mean that she won't get the same support as had she still raced for Poland, but simultaneously she won't see her goals subsumed to those of Kasia or Gosia; she did win the GP Plouay a couple of years ago so can't be underestimated, but the lack of team support and a quiet season will probably hold her back. Likewise Amialiusik, who won that Baku race when the Dutch committed tactical seppuku - however following a string of injuries she doesn't seem quite the rider she was four years ago and while she's still a strong hand, I can't say that she will really be considered a threat to win from the majority of compositions of any breakaway or attack group. Russia are unpredictable - on paper this course should suit Chursina and she's a very decent rider indeed, while Novolodskaya is a very strong young prospect, but they tend to get their results in middling fields rather than against the world's elite. Finally, Rasa Leleivyte is foraging alone and this is the kind of course that suits her - but foraging alone on this kind of course will be an absolute nightmare once racing is on because getting to and from the team car and getting back without there being any moves that you need to decide whether you should follow or not is a challenge, and so being there at the business end of proceedings will require not just the legs but a good deal of luck too - in the Olympics with the tiny péloton that's not so bad, but with 150+ riders in the Worlds, that's another question.

You ever wrote a book? :p:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rick
What gets me the most about this is... couldn't they at least have given him some sort of warning? If the drafting took place for around 2 minutes, and it was all being filmed - if not broadcast - would it have been completely impossible to tell him to maybe… not do that?

And I wonder, where Konychev and Stokbro allowed to finish? Because if they weren't, and Eekhoff was, then it just makes UCI seem even more clueless.
They mentioned Stokbro on Danish television, but I can't remember if they directly stated that he'd been DQed, or if he was just "out of the race" metaphorically; not being able to challenge for the win anymore (I suppose if he'd pulled out, then he'd be listed as DNF.)