A
Anonymous
Guest
fpcyclingn said:Really? Show me proof.
When you get to 80 posts, I MIGHT take you seriously enough to do so.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
fpcyclingn said:Really? Show me proof.
Thoughtforfood said:When you get to 80 posts, I MIGHT take you seriously enough to do so.
colwildcat said:Wow, if number of posts is a sign of intelligence, you must be really smart.
Oh wait, Ive read your posts.
Apparently it just means you have a lot of time on your hands.
Turd Ferguson said:Americans are into Nascar where there is not much more than driving in circles. Unfortunately, someone that knows nothing about cycling and watches versus will get bored. Americans just are not into cycling...cause of the spandex no doubt. They need to make it more interesting to the average joe somehow...which they are trying to do but not necessarily acomplishing.
hulkgogan said:See here's what I don't get. Americans don't watch cycling so why dumb it down for a general public that doesn't give a crap? Better to go hardcore and serve the niche market well than alienate them to serve an audience that never shows up.
Marketing people are ***. How come they always end up making the decisions?
Thoughtforfood said:Ok, even the little 90's graphics men Versus uses to show the effect of wind have one with a yellow, one with a green, and one in an Astana jersey among them.....I just don't have words......
colwildcat said:try a thesaurus, they come in handy.
This isn't hard, they feel their target audience wants to know where Lance is. Yes, we know you hate Lance
Thoughtforfood said:They want to know where Lance is in a graphic that demonstrates how the wind affects cyclists? Really? You are that much of a chamois sniffer that you need to know where he is in cartoon depicting fake cyclists........doesn't surprise me.
colwildcat said:There you go, assuming everyone who has the nerve to disagree with you is a fanboy or a chamois sniffer, whatever the hell that means. I didn't say I need to know, I said they feel the American viewer, most of whom have no clue what an echelon is, might want to know. I'm not their target, nor are you. You obviously know more about cycling than anyone here.
Thoughtforfood said:So their target audience consists of people who need to know where Armstrong is in an animated instructional video? You were able to discern this through your vast powers of interpretation? I would suggest that when the answer is stupid.....well.......
colwildcat said:And your explanation is what exactly? That the people who are smart enough to be running a TV network just threw it in there for no reason? And sorry, I didn't see the exact video you're railing on about, I thought you were refering to their illustration of where the leaders jerseys were in relation to the peloton
Thoughtforfood said:Oh, I knew what you were referring to the whole time. I just kept wondering when you would catch up with the fact that you flamed me without knowing what you were talking about. I would suggest that if you are going to be an *** to someone who has never posted anything in regards to you, you do it only when you know what the hell the person you are insulting is talking about. My explanation is that Versus is doing everything they can to market Mr Armstrong, and that it is onerous and done so for the benefit of some of the most ignorant (meaning uninformed) people who watch cycling. That they have bothered to do it is merely clear evidence of the whole gestalt of this thread. I am on topic, you are just looking to insult someone for reasons that are obvious to anyone who ever took a Psych 101 class.
I have said before, I will post respectfully with anyone who shows the same. You haven't, but please, don't feel the need to stop. I enjoy making asswipes look stupid.
mikeNphilly said:Guys pay no attention to Food-for Brains--he is one of those message board all-stars, with the high post count...He thinks you don't know anything if you have a low post count...seen his type for years on other message boards, his type can be quite funny if you take them at their comedy value. Off to ride...
Versus... they need an ad with the tag line, "Fluffing LA all the way to Paris."mikeNphilly said:And getting to watch Versus, at work on my laptop, or the 42 inch LCD computer screen we have in the office, is awesome, thank you Versus for the live english speaking, no lag, no commercial broadcast.
colwildcat said:we were making the same point, that you and I are not their target audience.
I simply grow tired of seeing you feign intellectual superiority on thread after thread.
grimpeur said:Versus... they need an ad with the tag line, "Fluffing LA all the way to Paris."
Thoughtforfood said:You obviously have a lot of dried semen on yours.....
marinoni said:I said it on another thread, I'm gonna say it again- I was away from the forum for 4wks. Before, most posters were intelligent, reasonably respectful adults. Now, I come back and the forum is overwhelmed by classless, loudmouthed a**holes. If I want to read garbage from a bunch of trash-talking lowlife children I'll go to myspace. Where are you 53x11, Bianchigirl, Alpe d'huez et al?
As for you pal, you should be banned from the forum for tasteless junk like this comment. Grow up!
forty four said:so the solution would be no vs coverage? wtf it was ok for the years la was gone certainly better than no coverage?![]()
Thoughtforfood said:Aren't you sweet......and hypocritical.....................
Look, I understand what you are saying. You should also understand that there have been a onslaught of fanboys who just insult and insult and insult. That was directed at one who had done so several times in the last couple of days. I would suggest for future posts regarding topics such as this, that you refrain from insult yourself unless you want to appear to be clueless and hypocritical. Your rant is no better than anything you are ranting about.
Past that, I have put several on ignore because their main point seemed to be to insult me and others who disagree with their opinions. I would suggest you could do the same for me and spare yourself the embarrassment of posting about that which you exhibit. Just a suggestion.