- Mar 19, 2009
- 832
- 0
- 0
zigmeister said:ROFL. Wow, this sounds oh so familiar. Oh wait, I remember now, this type of rant is basically a copy/paste from the US Dept of Justice failed case against Armstrong post in the other thread.
Why is this going to be any different? All of the evidence has been leaked, and is known regarding the situation. What exactly new or different or they going to come up with for "evidence" besides Landis and Hamilton and their fantastic eye witness accounts backed by their stellar credibility?!?!
So, what exactly are we going to learn from this case and what will happen?
Nothing. Wasted money.
I doubt zigmeister is really interested in understanding what it going on...but for anyone who shares his feelings and does want to get an idea of how it could go down, the Kayle Leogrande decision provides it. He was USADA's first non-analytical positive suspension:
LEOGRANDE DECISION
Kayle had a suspicious sample for EPO, told Rock Racing team staff he had used, and Joe Papp provided a photo that confirmed he was very familiar with the drug.
You will notice that in Kayle's case he was only suspended for a specific doping incident even though USADA tried to pin other stuff on him, which may bode relatively well for Lance and Johan, meaning they escape the worst possible sanctions. But there will be a whole lot more witness testimony against Lance than Kayle, and likely a lot of it will corroborate each other. Lance and Johan are in real jeopardy here.
