- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,854
- 2
- 0
thehog said:I can see McQuaid announcing some form of "doping ammesty" program. Attempting to create something to look good and getting themselves out of the Armstrong problem.
He's hopelessly compromised. Still, its hard to see how he'll fall even if the corruption is revealed. Who would dare run a vote of no confidence?
Race Radio said:Manged admission in the works
ChewbaccaD said:I hope it involves publicly apologizing to all of the people he has slandered and hurt over the years. It won't because he believes they deserved it, but here is to hope. I hope it also includes the details of how he went to the UCI and played the "Look at my story. People are inspired by it. Look at the money I bring cycling. Look at the US audience who now watches because of me. Think of the money I will bring in if you just let me do it my way and protect me in doing so" and how they decided to play along.
In all honesty, the UCI is ultimately the worst offender in this. They created a system for people like Lance that allowed the pollution of doping to continue, and many more people to be hurt and destroyed because of that. Cycling was seen as a filthy sport because it was, and it was because the UCI allowed some people to sh*t all over the room in full view of all of the other riders. How could the sport ever be clean with the UCI playing both sides behind the scenes?
I want Pat and Hein to go down as much if not more than Lance. Their complicity ruined the sport for many years and they deserve to go down for their sins.
thehog said:When asked by VeloNews about the letter during the post-race press conference for the men’s Olympic keirin, McQuaid said, “I prefer not to talk about the U.S. Anti-Doping agency. I’m here to talk about the Olympic Games.”
BroDeal said:Exactly.
Beyond that, we concentrate on the european pro side of the sport here but the average national fed just cares about the Olympics, amateur cycling, and a very small to non-existent pro side of the sport in their own country or region. The European pro stuff does not matter much to the small countries, and they may even support the UCI's attempt to sweep doping under the rug.
Berzin said:And why would he want to discuss what is turning out to be one of the biggest scandals the UCI has ever had to face?
He's doing a great job of managing the situation so far, let him enjoy the Olympics!!!![]()
BroDeal said:What is Armstrong's best move?
Right now he is concentrating on process and hoping to use a technicality to limit the scope of what is at stake, perhaps to beat the rap completely or delay it until it gets dropped or becomes irrelevant. Eventually he will do what he can to apply pressure to the witnesses, many of whom probably would like to avoid testifying in person. Maybe the number of witnesses can be whittled down to where the case is beatable. Pressing on while expecting the "Hail, Mary" pass has always worked for him in the past for all sorts of issues in his life.
Can he make a deal to accept losing the 2004 and 2005 TdFs in exchange for the USADA not going beyond the statute of limitations? The precedent for going outside the SOL looks sketchy to me. It involves deceiving prior anti-doping proceedings and the athlete being denied the benefits of his deception. That is perfectly sensible, but it is not clear that actions outside of an anti-doping proceeding will be seen as equivalent. The USADA may have not want that tested in CAS. They may also be relieved to chalk up a win and save the money and effort of a war. Witnesses like Hincapie and Leipheimer would undoubtedly be pleased to not be drawn into the circus that a full-on battle would become.
Race Radio said:Manged admission in the works
chewbaccad said:i hope it involves publicly apologizing to all of the people he has slandered and hurt over the years. It won't because he believes they deserved it, but here is to hope. I hope it also includes the details of how he went to the uci and played the "look at my story. People are inspired by it. Look at the money i bring cycling. Look at the us audience who now watches because of me. Think of the money i will bring in if you just let me do it my way and protect me in doing so" and how they decided to play along.
Turner29 said:..Armstrong will challenge with some sort of legal suit, the basis of which remains to be seen.
