Certainly true, in terms of size and............................... boredom.Señor_Contador said:Neither race is close to the Tour de France.
Meanwhile, all RAI can do is show Liquigas at the GP Modena and talk about Nibali's victory.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Certainly true, in terms of size and............................... boredom.Señor_Contador said:Neither race is close to the Tour de France.
hrotha said:Not to mention yesterday's 12 seconds weren't a gift. Saying "Mosquera should have been with Nibali in that finish" is like saying "Nibali should have been with Mosquera in that climb" if he had lost 55 seconds today.
Libertine Seguros said:Either way, the hegemony has been continued.
In 2010, the most prestigious GT was the Tour, followed by the Giro then the Vuelta. And the Giro provided the most excitement, followed by the Vuelta, then the Tour.
More or less the same as every year - even last year, when the Vuelta and Tour seemed to be in an argument as to who would be worse.
Barrus said:To be quite honest, IF the stopwatch from Sporza was correct Mosquerra never had more, than if I am correct 13 seconds
Mellow Velo said:Certainly true, in terms of size and............................... boredom.
Meanwhile, all RAI can do is show Liquigas at the GP Modena and talk about Nibali's victory.![]()
"Si mi Tia tuviera huevas seria mi Tio"Señor_Contador said:Well, that's where the "imagine" part comes into play. That's all. You're right on the calculations though.
Let's do it again: Nibali had 38 seconds on Mosquera prior to stage 19. Imagine the Spaniard did not concede any time on stage 19. That's 38 seconds going to stage 20.
At -1 kilometer, on the Bola del Mundo stage, Mosquera had 20 seconds on Nibali. If we do the math: 38 - 20 = 18 seconds. Let's say, for the heck of it, that someone ended up the stage between Mosquera and Vincenzo, meaning the Galician would get the 20 second time bonus and Nibali would get 0 (I don't think there was a time bonus for 3rd). That's 18 - 20 = - 2 second to Mosquera, making Ezequiel the winner of the 2010 Vuelta.
That's gotta itch like a bítch with STDs.
The Hitch said:<snipped>
Not my credibility anyway, i took it from Christopher Hitchens when i chose this name. He has vast stacks so no need to worry.
Spare Tyre said:In my eyes he lost a heck of a lot of it when he supported GWB and the neocons in the invasion of Iraq.
Escarabajo said:"Si mi Tia tuviera huevas seria mi Tio"
![]()
Señ said:I'm not trying to change the subject here on Nibaly Day but... when it comes to the Giro and the Vuelta, if they want to beat the Tour de France all they have to do is simple: Double the TdF prize winnings. All of a sudden the best riders and the best teams will show up at those events and will avoid the TdF.
It's that simple.
Señor_Contador said:Well, that's where the "imagine" part comes into play. That's all. You're right on the calculations though.
Let's do it again: Nibali had 38 seconds on Mosquera prior to stage 19. Imagine the Spaniard did not concede any time on stage 19. That's 38 seconds going to stage 20.
At -1 kilometer, on the Bola del Mundo stage, Mosquera had 20 seconds on Nibali. If we do the math: 38 - 20 = 18 seconds. Let's say, for the heck of it, that someone ended up the stage between Mosquera and Vincenzo, meaning the Galician would get the 20 second time bonus and Nibali would get 0 (I don't think there was a time bonus for 3rd). That's 18 - 20 = - 2 second to Mosquera, making Ezequiel the winner of the 2010 Vuelta.
That's gotta itch like a bítch with STDs.