Some of you defending Vingo/Roglic on here should enter the Olympics, with all the logical gymnastics you're doing trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
They're crap teammates who are in it only for themselves. At least just admit it.
When you know something about cycling, then you can give advice. It's not about deciding at the table who wins, but sport, competition. Jumbo must allow the best to win, the future equilibrium at the team depends on it. You can't tell champions like Vingegaard and Roglic, who are as close to Kuss as they are, they can't take their chances. Kuss knows this first and foremost. Roglic can't be held back, nor Vingegaard if they can win this Vuelta. They signed agreements for that privilege, based on what they have achieved at Jumbo-Visma. Of course, this doesn't mean they want Sepp to lose or would take enjoyment in surpassing him. But it's their right to do so if he can't follow, because they still give Jumbo the win, which is the primary team objective. Kuss has said it doesn't matter which of them wins, so long as Jumbo wins, as it should be. Naturally he dearly wants to win and would do so deservingly if he has the legs to do it. However, again, with the three so close on GC it's right, as the team has stipulated, that each can go for it. Notice how Vingegaard today just rode in on Roglic's wheel, which otherwise would have been an inexcusable act of betrayal. Yet neither betrayed Kuss, but only legitimately rode their own race to the finish. To not have done so, would have been a betrayal to the competition, which should not see such champions be forced to hold back. And they are not Kuss's domestiques now, but co-leaders with him. On the other hand, were Kuss to have shot away leaving the others behind, then they bridged up alone AND then attacked him that, yes, would have been an act of betrayal. But that's not what happened today.