Vuelta a España Vuelta a España 2024, stage 15: Infiesto - Cuitu Negru, 142.9k

Page 19 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
He was being sarcastic.

But apparently he did get a 20 second time penalty for drafting behind the Red Bull car after the bike change, which is bullsh*t.
It isn’t, it really is not. He was drafting about about 25cm off the bumper for some distance. It was utterly blatant and at the end of the day equipment problems are part of the race.

And I say that as someone who likes Rogla alot.
 
Because he gained no advantage? I mean WTF. He was in the peloton safely, swapped safely and then returned safely.

If GC is decided by this penalty (which I don't think it will be) then sh*t.
If he didn't think he was going to gain an advantage by changing bike, why did he do it? And if drafting behind cars yields no advantage, why do so many riders do it so often?
 
If he didn't think he was going to gain an advantage by changing bike, why did he do it? And if drafting behind cars yields no advantage, why do so many riders do it so often?

It isn’t, it really is not. He was drafting about about 25cm off the bumper for some distance. It was utterly blatant and at the end of the day equipment problems are part of the race.

And I say that as someone who likes Rogla alot.

Because this is real life? Let's siphon through all the footage of this Vuelta since day 1 with detective eyes & spot the sticky bottles, drafting & god knows what else that happens.

A little bit a tact from the commissaires would be welcome.
 
I guess that penalty is for the team car waiting for him, so they could pull him up to the front part of the convoy without having to jump from car to car, but it didn‘t take long to catch up to the other cars, so it‘s a borderline call and probably just applied because he didn‘t actually have a mechanical.
Yes.

That was some of the most egregious car draft I've seen in a while, he had 2 teammate s and they were 2 cm from the bumper. Especially because he hadn't gone back for a wee, a bottle or a mechanical. It was totally optional and he wanted to give himself an advantage without paying the bill.
 
Pretty irrelevant as Roglic didnt get punished for a sticky bottle.

I get it. Car drafting = worse thing ever someone please call the UN right here right now, whilst sticky bottles = je ne sais quoi shrugs.

I mean... this conversation is going round in circles here. I'm saying penalizing the rider like that at a critical moment in the race absolutely shows a lack of tact of the commissaires. I mean this sort of sh*t could decide the Vuelta winner. It's not a joke.
 
I'm saying penalizing the rider like that at a critical moment in the race absolutely shows a lack of tact of the commissaires. I mean this sort of sh*t could decide the Vuelta winner. It's not a joke.
Ahahhahahahahaha maybe don't blatantly draft on camera after doing a bike change by choice in a critical moment of the race then? This is entirely self inflicted and a relatively small penalty that is unlikely to decide the race
 
I get it. Car drafting = worse thing ever someone please call the UN right here right now, whilst sticky bottles = je ne sais quoi shrugs.

I mean... this conversation is going round in circles here. I'm saying penalizing the rider like that at a critical moment in the race absolutely shows a lack of tact of the commissaires. I mean this sort of sh*t could decide the Vuelta winner. It's not a joke.
He didn't have to draft the car, or change bike. He didn't have a mechanical.
 
I mean... this conversation is going round in circles here. I'm saying penalizing the rider like that at a critical moment in the race absolutely shows a lack of tact of the commissaires. I mean this sort of sh*t could decide the Vuelta winner. It's not a joke.
You could claim that the penalty is too harsh and unusual, but what you‘re saying is that Roglič is too important and therefore above the law. I don‘t agree with that.
 
I get it. Car drafting = worse thing ever someone please call the UN right here right now, whilst sticky bottles = je ne sais quoi shrugs.

I mean... this conversation is going round in circles here. I'm saying penalizing the rider like that at a critical moment in the race absolutely shows a lack of tact of the commissaires. I mean this sort of sh*t could decide the Vuelta winner. It's not a joke.
And others are saying that a penalty that is not draconian, but that is greater than the advantage gained, is reasonable sanction for a rule transgression.

I think it is unlikely that Roglic will win by lose at all, even less so that he will lose by less than 20 seconds, but if he does so that will be because he and the team made a wrong choice, not the commissaires.
 
You could claim that the penalty is too harsh and unusual, but what you‘re saying is that Roglič is too important and therefore above the law. I don‘t agree with that.

That's like literally not what I'm saying. At all.

I'm saying the law is very selective in this instance. There's a difference. This is only going to end one way anyway, i.e. next time someone does something on camera which is technically outside of the permitted rules (like those aforementioned sticky bottles which no one seems to care about) & absolutely nothing happens... then yeah, I'll just laugh. Sardonically.

You should read the Roglic thread, some genuinely seem to believe it's some sort of conspiracy.

Haters gonna hate. Some have come out en force after they disappeared on Friday evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acm and ManicJack

TRENDING THREADS