rhubroma said:
cineteq said:
So taking risks, without falling, is not part of being a 'great descender'? Apparently this has nothing to do with having a good descending technique. Why do we have to endure reading nonsense?
blackmamba said:
Hugo Koblet said:
For reference, here are the descending times of the top 20 on the stage:
Sergio Henao: 11'47
Brambilla +14
Monfort +16
Bilbao +16
Costa +17
Quintana +18
Sanchez +25
Visconti +28
Rodriguez +31
Van den Broeck +34
Vervaeke +35
Contador +36
Spilak +37
Yates +38
Felline +40
Pinot +44
Cataldo +45
Sebastian Henao +58
Lopez +1'04
Rosa +1'05
Before ignorant people comes showing up with stupid comments.
On a wet decent like this which is not very super technical its more about who is willing to take most risks rather than who is the best descender, now you know that too
With the margine Contador had on the climb for him it was about managing the situation. It was for others to take risks. A fall at plus 60 kmh can be season ending.
''So taking risks, without falling, is not part of being a 'great descender'?'' Where did I say that, please explain that to me, holy moly

It ofc is part of beeing a good descender, but today it was MORE about whos willing to take the most risk downhill since it was wet roads I mean what is it you dont understand?