- Jun 16, 2009
- 19,654
- 2
- 0
You going to compare Kump, Walker and Ratto with Kristoff and Van avermaet? Good work einstein!hrotha said:Being fast is not the same as being a sprinter. Van Avermaet isn't a pure sprinter, Kristoff sucks right now (he might become good, but right now the most he can aim at is a top 10 in some GT stages), and I reckon the last time Quinziato contested a mass sprint must have been as a junior or something. In light of that, not having lame sprinters and focusing your energies on other fields where you can actually contend (like stage races in the case of Geox) is a perfectly valid choice. And even then, if we're going to rate unproven fast riders as strong sprinters, why not rate Walker, Kump and Ratto?
Ok maybe I was a bit harsh on the tour of portugal. I never tried to compare Duarte as he is a big talent but people knocking Kristoff is also wrong. I personally don't see the quality field in the Tour of portugal that you can say that Blanco is that good. I would agree that Geox have a better stage racing team (not way better), but clearly BMC are streaks ahead of Geox in all other areas.Libertine Seguros said:ACF, christ.
You need to check out the Volta a Portugal. It's a damn hard race. There are some damn good riders who do it. A lot of them ride in Portugal because the money is better than Spanish domestic racing, others because they were untouchable because of Puerto. The reputation of Portuguese cycling means that a lot of riders who are easily good enough to get out (cf the post earlier of André Cardoso) won't be looked at by the big teams. Iván Santaromita's biggest win is the Settimana Coppi e Bartali. Very good, but the main reason he won it was that Liquigas did a better TTT than Miche (he and Niemiec fought out the decisive break). Coppi e Bartali is just one of several buildup races for the Giro. The Volta a Portugal is the absolute pinnacle of the season for that scene, and there are lots of talented riders there. Blanco was so dominant this year that I was annoyed. He won both major MTFs (Senhora da Graça and Torre), and placed 2nd in the long ITT.
It's like the TDU argument all over again - the TDU has bigger names than the Volta, but it's a joke to consider it a tougher race. You seem to be too easily blinkered by presence of big names. Think of it as similar to the Giro, yea? The Italian teams, they plan out all year for that. So when the big guns roll into town, some of them aren't solely focused on the Giro because of other goals, and they get blown out. The Volta is similar but at a slightly lower level; Gilberto Simoni said he wouldn't come back, after being mercilessly pillaged by the domestic riders who fight all year for the Volta. 11 days of riding around in searing heat up mountains is not to be taken lightly, and the difficulty is a large reason why a lot of big names don't show up.
For reference, another former Volta a Portugal winner just had his first real year at the top level. He showed just what the standard of that race is. His name? Xavier Tondó. Hopefully I don't have to list what HE did in 2010, but needless to say it's bigger than most of the people who'll be slaving for Evans.
You need to put down the rose-coloured spectacles, and stop being so harsh on people who aren't in BMC unless you're prepared to take it. BMC have improved and they have some good riders. But you seem to artificially inflate their quality, as if they somehow absorb awesomeness from being around Evans. No amount of argument is going to persuade us that Tschopp is a better climber than Blanco after Tschopp, as a journeyman, picked up a brilliant Giro stage, while Blanco won one of the toughest races in the world four times, holding on and beating people who train all year for the race in the high mountains. No amount of argument is going to persuade us that Kristoff is better than Duarte, notwithstanding that they're not comparable in the slightest.
You hold such obvious double standards it makes you an easy target.
The Hitch said:I think ACF has simply looked at the idea that Geox have no classics guys and decided that this is a strategically safe place to make a stand.
From there he can keep calling BMC a team for classics and gts hence better.
After that come one or 2 unfair comments about the Volta and about bmc being better than the Basques
Personally though i think Geox's strenght in gts will more than make up for the deficit they have to BMC in classics, whos only real hope at a monument is Cuddles in liege.
Its not like BMC signed Cancellara.
Incidentally though i think Geox could do ok at Ardennes if they were invited and cared. Surely Menchov could compete, no?
This post does not even deserve a reply it is so stupid.