Dr. Maserati said:You have been 'hoodwinked' my friend.
PMCG76's post is one of the finest pieces of sarcasm on one of the most amusing threads on this forum in a long time.
Couldn't agree with you more. A masterpiece!
Dr. Maserati said:You have been 'hoodwinked' my friend.
PMCG76's post is one of the finest pieces of sarcasm on one of the most amusing threads on this forum in a long time.
Sprocket01 said:Yes this is your interpretation of what happened. The point is, this was the climb the poster was refering to.
I'm not really hijacking the thread - there wouldn't be much of a thread here in the first place if it wasn't for me. I am being asked a lot of questions, it would be rude not answer most of them. Going to eat some chicken now...
Sprocket01 said:Yes this is your interpretation of what happened. The point is, this was the climb the poster was refering to.
I'm not really hijacking the thread - there wouldn't be much of a thread here in the first place if it wasn't for me. I am being asked a lot of questions, it would be rude not answer most of them. Going to eat some chicken now...
Dr. Maserati said:I thought you were in the UK? It would be 02:30 GMT? No wonder you cant sleep at night....
Dr. Maserati said:I thought you were in the UK? It would be 02:30 GMT? No wonder you cant sleep at night....
pmcg76 said:RadioShack will be going to the Tour with no designated leader like this year with Astana. The main aim will be to sweep the peloton, its all for the team.
This after all is the Bruyneel way, no designated leader and let the road decide. This is the most effective way and anyone who disagrees is just stupid and knows nothing about cycling because Bruyneel is the master tactician with more GTs to his name than anyone else.
Even if one of the guys is leading the race, he will be expected to do domestique work for his lower ranked team-mates to ensure they have a shot at the podium. Just like the marines, nobody will be left behind. The team is more important than individual victory. This method has won Bruyneel 10 Tours so no questions asked.
The other plus is that because RadioShack will have 3 leaders, AC wont know who to follow and lets face it, he will be clueless without Bruyneel guiding him. You think he was stupid this year, wait until next year. If it werent for the Hog, Contador would still not have won a major Tour. I predict a RadioShack podium sweep with Lance winning and helping his team-mates onto the podium.
pmcg76 said:RadioShack will be going to the Tour with no designated leader like this year with Astana. The main aim will be to sweep the peloton, its all for the team.
This after all is the Bruyneel way, no designated leader and let the road decide. This is the most effective way and anyone who disagrees is just stupid and knows nothing about cycling because Bruyneel is the master tactician with more GTs to his name than anyone else.
Even if one of the guys is leading the race, he will be expected to do domestique work for his lower ranked team-mates to ensure they have a shot at the podium. Just like the marines, nobody will be left behind. The team is more important than individual victory. This method has won Bruyneel 10 Tours so no questions asked.
The other plus is that because RadioShack will have 3 leaders, AC wont know who to follow and lets face it, he will be clueless without Bruyneel guiding him. You think he was stupid this year, wait until next year. If it werent for the Hog, Contador would still not have won a major Tour. I predict a RadioShack podium sweep with Lance winning and helping his team-mates onto the podium.
Mountain Goat said:They sure do !!
This is the only way to beat AC. He is yet to win a GT without the support of the best stage race team in the modern era...
Mountain Goat said:They sure do !!
This is the only way to beat AC. He is yet to win a GT without the support of the best stage race team in the modern era, and whilst I think he is still the number one favourite for the 2010 tour, it is going to be so hard to follow all the attacks from the up-and-comers, and the old farts with one year left.
That said, AC could just be the first to attack and leave them in his wake...
Sprocket01 said:No they weren't obviously better than LA during the tour. They perhaps started a bit better but Levi was out before it got to the tough bits so we just don't know if he would have collapsed like he did in the Giro. Kloden also cracked during the last week whilst Armstrong got stronger, and LA dropped him a few times as I recall. If Armstrong can bring that last week form to the whole tour this time then there is no reason why he will not be the best in his team.
Sprocket01 said:Mellow Velo,
As a character he thrives on grudges and needs seige mentality to motivate him, so with all the bust ups and allegations this year, and the general upscalling of hatred against him, it should work a lot better for his focus through the whole year.
By the way he did domestique for Levi during the Giro and did the whole water bottle thing, so it's not like he is incapable of that.
Mellow Velo said:Sorry to concentrate on the obvious, but the same could almost be said of Lance. The only differences being he has lost a GT, with the support of the same super team, while Contador has won one, with the leftover support of the that team.
53 x 11 said:The Col de Neverfarkinghappened is a magic climb 63 kms long, av gradient 25% some sections are vertical. Its definitely the hardest climb in the Land of Make Believe.
Armstrong is the only person Man enough to tackle this climb.
You don't honestly think that he could have won against Schlecklet even if AC has been out of the picture?Mountain Goat said:I don't think that 1999 US Postal was the greatest stage race team in the modern era, which was what I said about AC (i.e. AC's 4 GT winning teams were better than Lance's 1999 team).... Plus, Lance did not 'lose' the TDF in the way you imply, becoz he was on the winning team. It would be accurate to say he LOST if andy schleck had of won, but LA 'lost' to a teammate, which I think is more respectable than losing to another team...
I think his 2007 win where he was younger and weaker might have been a tad more challenging. Still if 2010 will be harder it will more likely be due to the Schlecks and Saxo Bank than due to LA and The Shack.Mountain Goat said:My point was that RadioS will be ready for the tdf with the aim of winning. AC will be with a lackluster Astana, which will mean the 3-on-1 tactics of Radio are more likely dampen his chances than he has faced in the last 4 GTs he won... I was just pointing out that compared to AC's first 4 GT wins, the 2010 TDF WIN will be his hardest GT win so far
Mountain Goat said:They sure do !!
And let's no forget that in 2007 LEVI LEIPHEIMER wore the numero uno for Discovery Channel, and Alberto Contador wore the numero duo, yet he attacked his team leader repeatedly....
Mountain Goat said:I don't think that 1999 US Postal was the greatest stage race team in the modern era, which was what I said about AC (i.e. AC's 4 GT winning teams were better than Lance's 1999 team).... Plus, Lance did not 'lose' the TDF in the way you imply, becoz he was on the winning team. It would be accurate to say he LOST if andy schleck had of won, but LA 'lost' to a teammate, which I think is more respectable than losing to another team...
My point was that RadioS will be ready for the tdf with the aim of winning. AC will be with a lackluster Astana, which will mean the 3-on-1 tactics of Radio are more likely dampen his chances than he has faced in the last 4 GTs he won... I was just pointing out that compared to AC's first 4 GT wins, the 2010 TDF WIN will be his hardest GT win so far
Publicus said:Apparently you tuned into the broadcast a little late then. Lance wasn't playing dutiful lieutenant, he was caught out tactically because of his own error. Andy Schleck had attacked the group of contenders (FS, BW, AC, AK, LA and maybe Nibali (sp)), and only AC responded immediately. Kloden bridged over, but Wiggins, Armstrong and Nibali couldn't match the acceleration and were left behind with Frank. Frank couldn't lead them back to Andy since they needed time into Bradley. Lance tries to force Wiggins to set the pace by slow pedaling. While he's doing this, he's looking at the ground and basically Wiggins almost runs into his wheel. Frank Schleck sees it, and takes off. Lance and Wiggins might as well have been walking up the hill at that point.
Lance actually put in an attack on Wiggins, but couldn't drop him and just settled in behind him and VdV until they both blew up, at which point he jumped away. He gained NO TIME ON AC, but did limit his losses to Kloden.
Get yourself a copy of Versus' coverage of Stage 17. It will confirm everything that I've written above is 100% accurate and free of bias.
Gee333 said:Playing Devil's Advocate and armchair QB, do you think that AC would have had the confidence and the motivation to win all three GT's if Rasmussen hadn't been thrown out of the '07 Tour? Rasmussen had a pretty good hold on the yellow and if memory serves me correctly, AC wasn't gaining a whole lot of time on him and the Chicken was answering all his attacks up to that point. Winning the '07 Tour certainly lit a fire in AC and we know what happened after that.
Just some food for thought...
Gee333 said:Playing Devil's Advocate and armchair QB, do you think that AC would have had the confidence and the motivation to win all three GT's if Rasmussen hadn't been thrown out of the '07 Tour? Rasmussen had a pretty good hold on the yellow and if memory serves me correctly, AC wasn't gaining a whole lot of time on him and the Chicken was answering all his attacks up to that point. Winning the '07 Tour certainly lit a fire in AC and we know what happened after that.
Just some food for thought...