So what? He would never have won that and winning is the main point?c&cfan said:he beat both of them at the WRR.
Once again these statistics are irrelevant as the chances are that in a small group sprint which we are talking about, it will much more a battle of who has the greatest accelaration than what FC does which is just prologue his way to the line. (though in terms of who is better at sprinting obviously Cancellara is, why in the world would Nibali be better??)maltiv said:Cancellara was 4th in the bunch sprints at the World Championships, and 4th on Champs Elysees...I haven't seen Nibali do that
Not really Canc can ride at ridiculuosly fast speeds for short times as well as long times and I think the jump here can be linked to his 4th at worlds + Champs d'elyseesScott SoCal said:Could not disagree more.
World class sprinters like Sagan, Goss, Cav and those guys have snap that Canc does not have. Canc can hold a ridiculous speed for a looong time but it takes him a little more to get there than Boonen. Or Goss. Or Sagan Or a handful of guys that finished at 2 seconds.
.
At MSR what should he have done then, waited until after the Poggiothehog said:I'm saying he needs to stop the hero attack.
....and correct yes he needs to wait for a selection and attack from that group. He needs others to show their hand first before playing his.
What would you do?
That was as much a selection as he could have gotten and the furthest gap he could have gotten, I think its pretty clear he shouldnt have attacked from 1.5km. (if you're referring to Flanders 2011 which was the only one which flopped then yeh ok.)
Exactly, Cancellara doesnt need to decimate the opposition just to beat them.Scott SoCal said:All jousting aside...
I'll tell my team that if one or two of them don't make the early move I will kick their azz.
Ultimately, If I am FC I want to solo in FTW. I don't think he can risk a late attack on a flat run-in where there may be significant wind involved.
He has to go 25 or 30k out on probably the 2nd trip up the Paterberg. He could wait for the last hill combo too. Somewhere in there is what I'd expect.
But, much depends on who's up the road, conditions and so on.
Roubaix last year was a perfect example of this, as he wasnt able to drop Hushovd and co. up to right near the end where it was too late. He didnt properly commit to an attack until then because he saw he couldnt properly shake off hushovd. If he had a better team then they could have reeled back in Van summeren and he would have won.
The key defining factor from Roubaix is that His rivals still have lots left in the tank from further out so it is stupid to attack then when they have more team mates to help catch him and when they are fresher so they can hold on, if Canc is the strongest he can wait and bide his time.
The only flaw with this is the problem that he may not have the strong enough team to control the race while this is going on and this is a problem and very possibly the reason why he attacked earlyish at Flanders last year.