Ross over at the "Science of Sport" blog mentions that there was more to the SI article that didn't make it in due to legal pressure. http://www.sportsscientists.com/2011/01/drug-of-2011-hemassist-and-armstrong.html
Any ideas what the allegations were? The unprinted material are lies of course. Because we ALL know SI has been printing lies for at least a decade...
Any ideas what the allegations were? The unprinted material are lies of course. Because we ALL know SI has been printing lies for at least a decade...