Waterloo Sunrise said:
Your first 2 points basically boil down to - he's physically capable of this, but would not normally get the chance or motivation - which is a terrible argument to advance if you want to say why that previous performance is not relevant when judging the rider as a potential leader later on in his career.
No. The argument is that a large % of the peloton are physically capable of finishing in and around the top 10 in a none tour gt, if that were their aim and they got a team to back them, so finishing top 10 in itself is not neccesarily such a special thing.
The reason average riders don't usually finish top 10 in a none tour gt is that no team is going to spend money building a team around them to finish top 10
Most riders at that level don't end up leading squads into gc battle but work as domestiques themselves or go for stages.
So the people who usually finish top 10 in gts are noted for it because they have done so on their own which is why its an acheivement in the first place.
If a top 10 contender suddenly has an entire team behind him to acheive that average aim then that is a notable advantage.
And even though you ignore it, caring is also an advantage, since many riders dont see it as that big a deal and top 10s are often acheived by chance from riders who otherwise feature high in mountain stages.
You dismiss the fact that he had the pink jersey on his back. But absolutely no one is going to continue going 100% to the line if they are 4 and a half minutes down on a mountain stage, unless they have a leaders jersey on their shoulders and still are placed high up in the gc.
Anyone else in that position is just going to let go and save for another day.
You are acting as if a grand tour was an event where 180 people got on a bike machine and the 10 people who posted the highest 10 scores are the top 10, totally ignoring every other variable in the sport.
The 3rd point is valid but weak - I don't recall a lack of competition trying to get a top 10 place in that race -there were still good riders trying to pass him for his place who did not manage to, such as Sastre.
.
I don't really trust what you do or don't recall from that giro if 1 sentence later you mention Sastre as a rider trying to pass him for his place. Sastre was the opposite, one of the few riders who was in the break (and there was a lot of hype about that) but was worse than Porte.
Riders who gave up on top gc after Laquilla. Garzelli for example, saved himself for a stage win from that point. Gadret took it easy on 1 stage not long after. Karpets who had been hoping for a top 10 before that just threw in the towell. Chris ANker Sorensen of course who became a domestique for Porte.
Plenty of other potential candidates from riders who performed well on some of the mountain stages.
Its simple logic though if before all the gt stages (only the weakest one - Terminillo had taken place), guys who find themselves 15 minutes down on gc are not going to kill themselves for a top 10 from that stage
Its ludicrous to deny it.