Wigans goes there. Cadence!

Page 120 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

Gung Ho Gun said:
Equalling Indurain should suffice for skeptics to have a field day
You mean his idol Indurain against whom there was no evidence ;)

It would be great because afterall wiggins grew up watching Indurain and dreaming about what it would be like to ride the Tour de France.

Then in 2009 he remembered that actually, his memory had been wrong all along. He grew up watching Indurain and dreaming what it would be like to win the Tour de France.

Stupid memory. Got confused for a decade there before the memory drug AICAR came out.
 
Re:

MagnificentMerckx said:
If Wiggins surpasses 53 km for the hour, he will shake up the World just like Ali.

I don't know. Maybe for a week or two. Totally my opinion, but I think most fans recognize the modern hour as a new record not really like the "old" one. Pick whatever version of "old" you like, Rominger, Merckx, Obree's record the UCI would rather not mention.

We need a few Germans to take a shot at it now that there's a "German" team and media rights have thawed.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
if north korea had forums they would look exactly like bikeretard.

the difference between NK media and british media is smaller than you'd think. It's just that the british media is a bit more subtle with their propaganda and brainwashing.

the reason why brits are so amazingly ignorant is because they get fed all these feel good stories in the media all the time, and almost never any counter arguments.
 
Umm what?
Firstly I really hope your comments about Brits in general being ignorant was a grammatical mistake on your part and not what you meant to say.

BTW you may want to actually consider the fact that most Brits on the forum don't believe in Sky. I can quite easily rattle off the names of about a dozen or so regular posters on here who are British and don't believe Sky for a second. That includes the poster you were responding to.

The comparison with North Korea doesn't even deserve a dignified response. Seriously grow up. And read some newspapers before commenting on such things.

Your suggestion that there is something British about celebrity worship is ignorant pure and simple. Every country does it.

PS while I am at it, I think your recent comments in race threads praising and lionizing the likes of Valverde and Katusha as "saviours of the sport" purely to annoy Sky fans were not just hypocritical to the extreme but pathetic.
 
Re:

Freddythefrog said:
It is informing to read the comments on various sites at the departure of Wiggins. Looking at the level of ignorance of many of the "I discovered cycling through Sir Bradley and I know more than you" posters, it is easy to understand how the 1.0 version "LA - its not about the bike", took such a grip. 2.0 The Brit version, wasn't anywhere near as good but the hold it takes on those so afflicted that they feel they must "pledge an oath", is similar.
So this is a guy who showed in PR that he still could not put together a realistic tactical challenge for a multi-faceted race scenario that required quick thinking whilst the race was hot. Going to the front some significant time before the vital moment and putting the hammer down is not a statement of tactical intent. It is a sop to those who don't understand road racing.

Richard Moore shows over at Cycling Weekly http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/lat ... ory-165925 that he has all the vision of a blind man, wearing a balaclava the wrong way round in a blacked out room. That he can actually write about Sir Bradley losing 10 kgs at the same time the undetectable drug aicar was ripping through the peloton, without any counter comment, is mind boggling. But then he is a bone idle, journo who can't even get his facts right about when Brailsford took over after Keen was shoved out.

Then there are all the fan boy posters comparing Sir Bradley to Merckx or any of the other dopers held up as paragons. The guy won the most boring GT in years, on a course designed for the latest "its all clean now" team to win. And even then Froome 2.2 should have taken the win, but Team Sky/BC/Sutton/Yates/Leinders/ program controlled by the patron saint of coaching, Sir David Brailsford needed to be seen to have masterminded the whole "success". A Froome win would not fit the bill like a Wiggins one would. After that he was a flop in the Giro and in many instances, eg his amnesia that comes and goes as needed,has shown he has all the attributes of a doping cheat with few morals.

I think my top site for comedy comment is Bike Radar. http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtop ... 0&start=60

You just have to marvel at how any functioning human could simultaneously hold with the concept that Sir Bradley is clean whilst despise Contador as a doper. I used to be baffled how those from the other side of the pond could possibly think that Ulrich, Pantani and the rest were dopers and yet Lance was clean. Now I see so many Brits coming out with the same totally illogical nonsense that appears to be based mainly on something akin to a religious belief system.

I only pray - who will be the Brit Floyd ?

There is good news though.

The party is over.

Now that he is gone, the whole wiggo myth is now in decline.

His retirement and stories like that from moore and I assume the other hacks who wrote sky books and want to squeeze another few pennies out, were the last hoorah, and it was fairly limited.

From now far less stories about wiggins. they will still mention him now and again, but a retired cyclist who won one tour 3 years ago isn't going to get that much attention in sport which ultimately survives on what have you done for me lately.

The public appetite for more wiggo stories is declining. It was a massive bubble. 2 weeks as the biggest star in the country. But next to no one actually watched his TDF win and his only claim to charisma was having sideburns and swearing a lot.

The attention he so much craved and got to enjoy so much for a few months in 2012, is never going to come back. Hell get glimpses of it if he breaks the hour record or uses the power of "marginal gains" to win another olympic gold as a grandpa.

His own joy at having won has declined. At first he said he was happy to win 1 tour, not contend again and let froome take the next one. That lasted a few months before he realized he wanted another tour afterall and got quite desperate in his attempts to steal Froomes leadership.

He also relapsed back into intense depression less than a year after winning the TDF. Very telling.

In short it was painful while it lasted, but now most of the good things that came wiggos way have passed.

I do hope one day he falls like his hero did, its always sweet to see bad guys pay for their actions. But if not, well, with a few exceptions no more *** to read about wiggins anyway and its good to know he still is mostly the same miserable person he was before he cheated his way to a TDF. Kimmage and Landis seem to be in better places mentally, which is a pleasant thought to have.
As Landis said wiggins knows what he did, even if he is a sociopath when it comes to guilt, the fear of getting caught and the knowledge that most of the cycling world never believed him for a second probably eat away at him at least a little.

In short, the party is over, but the bill may still have to be paid. Best case scenario, he is made to pay for their sins. Worst case scenario, he continues to fall into relative irrelevancy and gets into a few tabloids a few times for his signature outbursts at whatever unlucky sod gets in his way when he is in a bad mood.

Either way crime hasn't paid anywhere near as much as I feared it would in July 2012 when we had to sit through wiggos hypocritical *** and hear nonesence about how he was the most loved and most trusted person in the history of cycling bla bla bla.

As for the forums where people believe in wiggins. Well let them be. Everyone has the right to believe what they want. Plenty of places on the internet where people believe fairytales. Many of the same people were the ones who believed in lance for so long. And if they got their little corner to do it, good for them.
 
Feb 22, 2011
462
0
0
Good riddance Wigans.

I'm so tired of the "I almost can't live with myself but the money's pretty good" look on that face...

Wiggles, you almost made me miss the days of the unapologetic sociopath

Now go on. Get. Go.
 
Jul 17, 2012
5,303
0
0
It's good to be an ignorant Brit, brainwashed on a daily basis by newspapers I rarely read and television I rarely watch. Hallelujah, thanks for pointing it out to me Sceptic, another stunningly worthy contribution to the dabate. For once I agree with Hitch
 
Mar 31, 2015
278
0
0
Re:

Freddythefrog said:
the undetectable drug aicar was ripping through the peloton

Been trying to find out more about AICAR, good article in Cycling Tips etc. Anywhere else you would recommend to find out a about it? What I have read is far from convincing it is that widespread, esp as Cycling tips mentions the treatments are half a million euros a pop (not sure how often treatments are needed?).

I am very cynical about performance based evidence, but from ploughing through some of the threads it's probably best not to go into that.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Re:

The Hitch said:
Umm what?
Firstly I really hope your comments about Brits in general being ignorant was a grammatical mistake on your part and not what you meant to say.

BTW you may want to actually consider the fact that most Brits on the forum don't believe in Sky. I can quite easily rattle off the names of about a dozen or so regular posters on here who are British and don't believe Sky for a second. That includes the poster you were responding to.

The comparison with North Korea doesn't even deserve a dignified response. Seriously grow up. And read some newspapers before commenting on such things.

Your suggestion that there is something British about celebrity worship is ignorant pure and simple. Every country does it.

PS while I am at it, I think your recent comments in race threads praising and lionizing the likes of Valverde and Katusha as "saviours of the sport" purely to annoy Sky fans were not just hypocritical to the extreme but pathetic.

oh look, the hitch is upset again that someone mentioned another forum that isn't the clinic as the holy grail of all doping related knowledge with the hitch as godfather of intelligent discussion and reasoned debate.

I meant bikeretard posters and not all brits in general so that was a mistake on my part. My point still stands though. If you read british media, the framework for debate is very narrow. Certain things are not even debatable, like for instance the fact that Sky might be doping. Hence, all the bots who only read the Wiggins feelgood stories and only started watching cycling in 2012 are going to be pretty brainwashed.
 
out today...........reading a mainstream paper.......thesun ........and there between the footy and cricket news is large report with pic

about brads coming tilt at the hour record

sorry! guys he ain't quite gone............................

Mark L
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Re: Re:

the sceptic said:
If you read british media, the framework for debate is very narrow.
from what i can tell this rings true, unfortunately.
quite a difference compared to, say, Ireland.
I'm always willing to change my mind though, if anybody could point me to some good, critical, inquiring british journalism wrt doping.
(Daily mail's recent inquiry of Knaven was welcome, but that seemed pretty agenda-driven; they're not interested in making any broader analyses of doping abuse in sports).
 
Re: Re:

the sceptic said:
The Hitch said:
Umm what?
Firstly I really hope your comments about Brits in general being ignorant was a grammatical mistake on your part and not what you meant to say.

BTW you may want to actually consider the fact that most Brits on the forum don't believe in Sky. I can quite easily rattle off the names of about a dozen or so regular posters on here who are British and don't believe Sky for a second. That includes the poster you were responding to.

The comparison with North Korea doesn't even deserve a dignified response. Seriously grow up. And read some newspapers before commenting on such things.

Your suggestion that there is something British about celebrity worship is ignorant pure and simple. Every country does it.

PS while I am at it, I think your recent comments in race threads praising and lionizing the likes of Valverde and Katusha as "saviours of the sport" purely to annoy Sky fans were not just hypocritical to the extreme but pathetic.

oh look, the hitch is upset again that someone mentioned another forum that isn't the clinic as the holy grail of all doping related knowledge with the hitch as godfather of intelligent discussion and reasoned debate.

I meant bikeretard posters and not all brits in general so that was a mistake on my part. My point still stands though. If you read british media, the framework for debate is very narrow. Certain things are not even debatable, like for instance the fact that Sky might be doping. Hence, all the bots who only read the Wiggins feelgood stories and only started watching cycling in 2012 are going to be pretty brainwashed.

You made a racist claim that all Brits are ignorant. Not the first time you have shown this type of behaviour. No surprise that you now try to cover over the fact with some weak personal bs.

Your motivations for posting on here and insulting everyone all the time appear to be far more sinister than a simple opposition to sky doping and lying.
 
Re:

ebandit said:
out today...........reading a mainstream paper.......thesun ........and there between the footy and cricket news is large report with pic

about brads coming tilt at the hour record

sorry! guys he ain't quite gone............................

Mark L
Sorry, don't read the sun.
I know its the favourite newspaper of the type of people that believe in Wiggins, but its not the kind of paper I look to.

I guess that's another difference between us doubters and you believers. ;)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Re: Re:

The Hitch said:
the sceptic said:
The Hitch said:
Umm what?
Firstly I really hope your comments about Brits in general being ignorant was a grammatical mistake on your part and not what you meant to say.

BTW you may want to actually consider the fact that most Brits on the forum don't believe in Sky. I can quite easily rattle off the names of about a dozen or so regular posters on here who are British and don't believe Sky for a second. That includes the poster you were responding to.

The comparison with North Korea doesn't even deserve a dignified response. Seriously grow up. And read some newspapers before commenting on such things.

Your suggestion that there is something British about celebrity worship is ignorant pure and simple. Every country does it.

PS while I am at it, I think your recent comments in race threads praising and lionizing the likes of Valverde and Katusha as "saviours of the sport" purely to annoy Sky fans were not just hypocritical to the extreme but pathetic.

oh look, the hitch is upset again that someone mentioned another forum that isn't the clinic as the holy grail of all doping related knowledge with the hitch as godfather of intelligent discussion and reasoned debate.

I meant bikeretard posters and not all brits in general so that was a mistake on my part. My point still stands though. If you read british media, the framework for debate is very narrow. Certain things are not even debatable, like for instance the fact that Sky might be doping. Hence, all the bots who only read the Wiggins feelgood stories and only started watching cycling in 2012 are going to be pretty brainwashed.

You made a racist claim that all Brits are ignorant. Not the first time you have shown this type of behaviour. No surprise that you now try to cover over the fact with some weak personal bs.

Your motivations for posting on here and insulting everyone all the time appear to be far more sinister than a simple opposition to sky doping and lying.

brits are a race now?

I dislike all nationalism and patriotism no matter where it comes from.
 
Feb 22, 2011
462
0
0
Cycling fans and sports media in every country are a lot like my wife's marriage.

As long as you constantly lower your expectations you'll find you're never disappointed.
 
Aug 3, 2010
843
1
0
Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
Os alquimistas estão chegando, estão chegando os alquimistas...

Sorry, my interpretation skills are not very good. Does that translate to this forum blows?
 
Re: Re:

the sceptic said:
The Hitch said:
the sceptic said:
The Hitch said:
Umm what?
Firstly I really hope your comments about Brits in general being ignorant was a grammatical mistake on your part and not what you meant to say.

BTW you may want to actually consider the fact that most Brits on the forum don't believe in Sky. I can quite easily rattle off the names of about a dozen or so regular posters on here who are British and don't believe Sky for a second. That includes the poster you were responding to.

The comparison with North Korea doesn't even deserve a dignified response. Seriously grow up. And read some newspapers before commenting on such things.

Your suggestion that there is something British about celebrity worship is ignorant pure and simple. Every country does it.

PS while I am at it, I think your recent comments in race threads praising and lionizing the likes of Valverde and Katusha as "saviours of the sport" purely to annoy Sky fans were not just hypocritical to the extreme but pathetic.

oh look, the hitch is upset again that someone mentioned another forum that isn't the clinic as the holy grail of all doping related knowledge with the hitch as godfather of intelligent discussion and reasoned debate.

I meant bikeretard posters and not all brits in general so that was a mistake on my part. My point still stands though. If you read british media, the framework for debate is very narrow. Certain things are not even debatable, like for instance the fact that Sky might be doping. Hence, all the bots who only read the Wiggins feelgood stories and only started watching cycling in 2012 are going to be pretty brainwashed.

You made a racist claim that all Brits are ignorant. Not the first time you have shown this type of behaviour. No surprise that you now try to cover over the fact with some weak personal bs.

Your motivations for posting on here and insulting everyone all the time appear to be far more sinister than a simple opposition to sky doping and lying.

brits are a race now?

I dislike all nationalism and patriotism no matter where it comes from.

How does that justify claiming all Brits are ignorant?