Re:
He's seems to be an absolute disgrace as a human being. That certainly can't be said about Wiggins. Probably not even about Armstrong. Because with Lance at least it's slightly comprehensible how he became that sociopathic and cocky.
As much as I disliked Wiggins as a cyclist, because of his conservative racing style, he comes over as a rather friendly person. Froome on the other hand, while instantly being liked for exposing Wiggins, comes over as an absolute mangy guy, with his fake friendliness, his dull groupie wifey etc. ppPantani_lives said:To me the difference between Wiggins and Froome is like the difference between Berlusconi and Bush. When Bush was on TV I switched channels, because I couldn't stand his face. When Berlusconi was on TV I kept watching because I wanted to know what scandal he was involved in this time. I knew he was a crook, but it had entertainment value. With Wiggins it's the same. Seeing how he transformed his body from gaunt cyclist to robust rower made me laugh. That guy is quite fanatic and eccentric.
He's seems to be an absolute disgrace as a human being. That certainly can't be said about Wiggins. Probably not even about Armstrong. Because with Lance at least it's slightly comprehensible how he became that sociopathic and cocky.