There are so many things wrong with Wiggins' statement. Is this really the same guy? He's reaching word-for-word out of LA's playbook.
"There isn’t an athlete or a cyclist out there that isn’t more tested than he is, certainly since his comeback, he’s probably been the most tested cyclist in the pro peloton and you take that on face value and that he’s never failed a drugs test and until he does he’s clean."
Wiggy knows damn well that "never failing a test" doesn't mean a damn thing.
"He’s probably been the most tested athlete and never failed a drugs test.”
Lance? Is that you?
“I think you have to question Landis’ credibility because he lied under oath before and the stories that you hear about him drinking and things like that and you know, [making] telephone calls to people I know, threatening them with things, you just think that the guy appears to not all be there."
Ah yes, the most recent assaults on Floyd's character. Very good, Bradley. The Lance & Johan Seal of Approval.
But what about the "stories we hear about" Lance doping?
WTF, Brad? You need "proof" for LA, but "stories about" are good enough to use against Floyd?
And to reiterate what I've already posted on a different thread:
Paul Kimmage traveled and stayed with the Garmin team in their first season. Even
he was shocked by what he heard about USPS and Lance's methods. You don't think Wiggy picked up those same stories...and then some?!
Really, for the life of me, I can't understand why any of this ridiculousness has gone past the I.M. between Frankie and J.V.
When Frankie referred to LA as a "liar and a cheat" just what-in-the-hell does any half-way intelligent, semi-functional adult think he was refering to in the midst of a private conversation with another former teammate of LA's.?
Someone care to explain that to me?
Get a grip on reality and use the slightest bit of common sense. Anything less is a complete and total state of denial of the painfully obvious truth.
God forbid some people should use their brains for just a bit of independent thought.