webvan said:Thanks, probably wasn't necessary but I guess he's getting annoyed...can't make the "w*****s" - wusses ? Ah no ok, w*a*n*k*e*r*s - hehe..
Gloin22 said:Wouldn't you be annoyed if people accused you of ****** without ANY evidence ?
*talking to everybody here*
I would...
roundabout said:Female....
Zam_Olyas said:****·er (wngkr)
n. Chiefly British Vulgar Slang
1. A person who masturbates.
2. A detestable person.
does that include women?
i think this one does:Zam_Olyas said:****·er (wngkr)
n. Chiefly British Vulgar Slang
1. A person who masturbates.
2. A detestable person.
does that include women?
Swifty's Cakes said:No women are never refered to as ****ers.
And people who hit wiggins up directly on twitter fall into category 2 (and possibly category one, but its unrelated). In contrast people who discuss doping in less personal terms and dont aim it directly at wiggins don't deserve that sort of treatment.
I see Brad from time to time at Rufford Marina during the winter, I'll have a quiet word with him and straighten all this mess out![]()
Zam_Olyas said:By the way did you know that.... "Liverpool born Jonny Marray was offered a massive cheque to sport 'The Sun' patches in his doubles final, he told them to get stuffed"
+1 particularly if you are earning a few million riding a bike for a living. I have no problem with sportmen earning that amount of money, but if they want that level of reward they have have to take all the comments that comes with it both on and off the bike. The concept of role model to the next generation seems to be missing with a lot of top sportmen.Christian said:After skimming through the clinic threads I'll still post my response here because I feel like I have nothing to add to a doping-related discussion and my main grievances with his remarks are not doping-related.
Random anonymous people on the internet suck. I should know, I am one. They say stuff they can't back up. For the people who are being accused (regardless of the nature of the accusation), that must be difficult to bear at times (regardless of whether said accusations are true or false). They can ignore it but that's probably not easy. However what they must absolutely not do is sink even lower than the level of an anonymous twitter-user. It's just disgraceful, especially for a maillot jaune. In any decent internet community people get banned for that kind of language, and rightfully so.
So when you get asked a question like that at a press conference, you compose yourself and you say something like "You can never convince anyone" or "As a professional, you've got to have a thick skin". Then you go backstage and you tell your DS all about what stupid w*nkers they are. But you don't go on rants analyzing random peoples lives and calling them every obscenity in the book ...
Swifty's Cakes said:yep, good lad. The Sun is socially unacceptable around these parts.
They wont be losing any subscribers in the UK. Cycling still barely rates a mention.Peccio89 said:Sky must be delighted by the fact that he attacked with that sentence a quite large share of their subscribers( proudly including myself by the way, but don't worry Rupert i'm not going to call of my contract) .
Back to the serious stuff, i think that this kind of interviews prove that Wiggo is really nervous, a nice incentives for rivals to attack him even more.
Normandy said:+1 particularly if you are earning a few million riding a bike for a living. I have no problem with sportmen earning that amount of money, but if they want that level of reward they have have to take all the comments that comes with it both on and off the bike. The concept of role model to the next generation seems to be missing with a lot of top sportmen.
icefire said:That'd require having some brains. But you know, upper body mass is considered as a useless load for a pro cyclist.