Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

[laurel1969]

You wrote two sentences. I responded to the second. That's half your post, hardly 'nitpicking'. I asked a question and I see you have refused to answer it.

It was obvious where you were going with this. I've just stopped you in your tracks.

Saxo=Sky(circa2012-13)=Astana09/Discovery(Contadors old team)=USPS.

Fanboism won't change that.

 

[Netserk]

It was obvious where you were going with this. I've just stopped you in your tracks.

Saxo=Sky(circa2012-13)=Astana09/Discovery(Contadors old team)=USPS.

Fanboism won't change that.

And where is that?

All I wanted to know was if you think that the whole team is dirty or not.

I don't think the whole team is dirty. Fair enough if you think so. Just don't respond with another deflection again, but either answer my question or ignore my post. I'm not interested in going around in circles.

 

[LaFlorecita]

Laurel, for someone constantly complaining about trolling and calling others out for it you're doing a good job at it yourself.

 

[laurel1969]

@Netserk

Enough of them to make the difference is the answer. But , that is pretty irrelevant.

Point being, Saxo=Sky=USPS.

Do you agree with that?

 

[laurel1969]

Laurel, for someone constantly complaining about trolling and calling others out for it you're doing a good job at it yourself.

Constantly? Go and read my entire post history and tell me what percent age contain complaints of trolling. It won't even be 0.25%.

(IIRC there is one person that I believe is a pointless troll, whose only purpose is to try and stir unrest on the forum and between forums. The guy seems to get a pretty free pass.)

Anyway, I'll admit, I'm slightly grumpy this morning and have probably taken it out on netserk. So apologies to Netserk.

 

[LaFlorecita]

@Netserk

Enough of them to make the difference is the answer. But , that is pretty irrelevant.

Point being, Saxo=Sky=USPS.

Do you agree with that?

... = Katusha = Astana = Movistar....

Not sure what your point is? Who cares if even Marko Kump, Jay McCarthy and Rory Sutherland are juiced up to the gills. It's Contador that matters in this thread (and in most other discussions I might add)

 

[laurel1969]

How many GTs have Katusha and Movistar won?

The point is that Saxo are the new USPS.

 

[Netserk]

@Netserk

Enough of them to make the difference is the answer. But , that is pretty irrelevant.

Point being, Saxo=Sky=USPS.

Do you agree with that?

The bolded I agree with.

I also think they are comparable with the two other teams mentioned.

Constantly? Go and read my entire post history and tell me what percent age contain complaints of trolling. It won't even be 0.25%

Since you have less than 400 posts, you are basically saying that you never ever have complained about trolling. Not really true, no?

 

[LaFlorecita]

How many GTs have Katusha and Movistar won?

The point is that Saxo are the new USPS.

I believe there is a thread called "How dirty is Saxo-Tinkoff"

 

[laurel1969]

So what? Contador didn't win all by himself.

 

[laurel1969]

Since you have less than 400 posts, you are basically saying that you never ever have complained about trolling. Not really true, no?

Fair cop

I've been up most of the night. I'm not sure I could even count to ten and get it right

 

[sniper]

How many GTs have Katusha and Movistar won?

The point is that Saxo are the new USPS.

comparing Saxo to either Sky or USPS is pointless as long as Saxo cannot be shown to have any direct connections to the UCI.
Thus far we can only assume that Saxo dope fair and square. No institutional help.

 

[laurel1969]

Whilst I get that your post is tongue in cheek, I can't recall any strong link between Sky and the UCI (sorry, Cooksons son in a menial job doesn't cut it).

As for USPS, we still don't know the extent of it, although its kind of obvious that it was there.

P.s. UCI tried to cover up Contador positive

 

[LaFlorecita]

Argh

WHY. Do you insist on discussing this in the Contador thread, while there's a thread for this specific subject on the front page.

FFS.

Is it so hard to click another thread and post there?

Why does it make a difference if all of TCS is doped? If only 50% of the team is doped does that change anything about the fact that Alberto is doped?

No.

 

[LaFlorecita]

P.s. UCI tried to cover up Contador positive

Indeed they did. But we've got Cookson in charge now.

And for some reason I don't believe he might be partial to Contador

 

[Bratam]

I think he might be clean....
Whatever he's started doing with the new coach seems to be working

Lol. You must be taking the **** ? How much did he improve from last year ? Perhaps it's his new bike that is the secret.

 

[The Hitch]

What are you chatting about? Really this makes no sense at all.

It does to.everyone but you.

So if something works, but you find an alternative that is equally effective (or more so) then that means the original doesn't work anymore? Clearly epo still has an effect, clearly blood doping still works.

Only you haven't offered an alternative. Your alternative is -being clean, which is the total absence of an alternative.

It's extremely simple logic, and I've never met anyone who doesn't understand it that if the total absence of a variable produces the same results as the variable did, then the variable has no impact.

But it's not the first time you have offered bizzaro logic.

 

[laurel1969]

Indeed they did. But we've got Cookson in charge now.

And for some reason I don't believe he might be partial to Contador

Unless you can produce some evidence I think we can safely put that down to delusion

 

[laurel1969]

Back to OP.

I'm trying to recall the last time Contador rode for a team that wasn't one of the known dirtiest. Saxo-Astana-Discovery-Once...

....why break a lifetime habit?

 

[Fearless Greg Lemond]

Back to OP.

I'm trying to recall the last time Contador rode for a team that wasn't one of the known dirtiest.

Good post, I hope someone on this forum can give a good answer to this very observing post.

 

[the sceptic]

Good post, I hope someone on this forum can give a good answer to this very observing post.

well he never rode for the dirtiest team of them all. (sky)

 

[Netserk]

Back to OP.

I'm trying to recall the last time Contador rode for a team that wasn't one of the known dirtiest. Saxo-Astana-Discovery-Once...

....why break a lifetime habit?

How would you rank the teams in 2003?

 

[LaFlorecita]

Unless you can produce some evidence I think we can safely put that down to delusion

lulz yes it's delusion

 

[LaFlorecita]

Back to OP.

I'm trying to recall the last time Contador rode for a team that wasn't one of the known dirtiest. Saxo-Astana-Discovery-Once...

....why break a lifetime habit?

It appears you're trying to argue Contador is a doper.

I don't think anyone besides RobbieCannuck would disagree.

 

[laurel1969]

It appears you're trying to argue Contador is a doper.

I don't think anyone besides RobbieCannuck would disagree.

Its an answer to the OP