Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

[Race Radio]

The way he stood up against Lance and Johan, that took some cojones and opened my eyes, no one ever did that before.

I can certainly understand this

 

[ferryman]

Which makes you MASSIVE hypocrite.

Of course Froome is a cheat. But why favour one cheat over another?

Its bullsh1t.

No it doesn't, as he explained he accepts (as we all do) all the top guys are doping and he simply has a favourite out of those. It's not so hard to understand. The fact that your guy is not anywhere near top dog anymore and is unlikely to be ever again until Contador calls it a day, is something you will just simply have to deal with, or maybe switch to watching a non doping sport (good luck with that).

 

[peloton]

I can certainly understand this

I got out of the cult

 

[Race Radio]

Which makes you MASSIVE hypocrite.

Of course Froome is a cheat. But why favour one cheat over another?

Its bullsh1t.

Not really. In order to be a fan of the sport most need to suspend analysis and just enjoy the racing. Lets face it, Contador is a very entertaining bike racer.

 

[gooner]

No it doesn't, as he explained he accepts (as we all do) all the top guys are doping and he simply has a favourite out of those. It's not so hard to understand. The fact that your guy is not anywhere near top dog anymore and is unlikely to be ever again until Contador calls it a day, is something you will just simply have to deal with, or maybe switch to watching a non doping sport (good luck with that).

I remember that said on here when Froome finished 4th in 2012 and look how that turned out.To write Froome off in relation to Contador's current performance is an over reaction to say the least. Contador himself is the best example contrasting the last two seasons.

This is a doping discussion forum. How can a rational discussion in a constructive manner be done when one's doping is more accepted by some and decried by the same with other riders?

The exciting argument, I just don't get. What I see with Contador now is the same stuff I seen with Vino on here after his Olympics win. The love in was spectacular while Wiggins was getting hammered pillar to post the previous month during his Tour win.

 

[Granville57]

Cheat is a cheat is a cheat. Fan is not favoring Contador the cheat opposed to Froome the cheat. Fan is favoring Contador the rider more than Froome the rider. Same can be said about Froome's fans. No hypocrisy there. Claiming that clean Contador is beating doped up Froome would be hypocrisy. And vice versa.

We will not have common sense injected into this debate.

 

[BYOP88]

I remember that said on here when Froome finished 4th in 2012 and look how that turned out.To write Froome off in relation to Contador's current performance is an over reaction to say the least. Contador himself is the best example contrasting the last two seasons.

This is a doping discussion forum. How can a rational discussion in a constructive manner be done when one's doping is more accepted by some and decried by the same with other riders?

The exciting argument, I just don't get. What I see with Contador now is the same stuff I seen with Vino on here after his Olympics win. The love in was spectacular while Wiggins was getting hammered pillar to post the previous month during his Tour win.

You sure you saw a Vino love in on here after the Olympics? The last one of those was 2012, so just out of interest what username were you using then?

 

[Alpe73]

How can a rational discussion in a constructive manner be done when one's doping is more accepted by some and decried by the same with other riders? .

Banter discussion glass is half full, while the rational discussion glass is half empty. C'mon, man ... this is still a my guy vs your guy rag. Nonetheless, still edifying in a banter sort of way. Is what it is.

 

[Alpe73]

Not really. In order to be a fan of the sport most need to suspend analysis and just enjoy the racing. Lets face it, Contador is a very entertaining bike racer.

Yep, fully agree.

 

[ChewbaccaD]

Which makes you MASSIVE hypocrite.

Of course Froome is a cheat. But why favour one cheat over another?

Its bullsh1t.

It's "It's" not "Its." Unless you are referring to some undisclosed object's bullsh!t...you know, since you seem so hung up on making sure each and every post is correctly punctuated and all...thought I'd help you out...

 

[Dear Wiggo]

It's "It's" not "Its." Unless you are referring to some undisclosed object's bullsh!t...you know, since you seem so hung up on making sure each and every post is correctly punctuated and all...thought I'd help you out...

Oh the irony of your recent thread title, fixed by a mod.

Original: Tommy D get's heckled

 

[ChewbaccaD]

Oh the irony of your recent thread title, fixed by a mod.

Original: Tommy D get's heckled

No irony at all. The poster that I was engaging with spent time telling me how horrific I was at punctuation today, and I am merely pointing out the irony of that...

So you failed on this one, but thanks for playing. I never claimed to be perfect in punctuation, I just figured someone like laurel, who likes to critique punctuation, would like to make sure all of her posts are properly punctuated.

Man, you really do have your panties in a bunch because you're too simple to understand the meaning of a "inherent." Carry on then.

 

[ChewbaccaD]

Oh the irony of your recent thread title, fixed by a mod.

Original: Tommy D get's heckled

Uh no, that is a complete fabrication. I actually didn't write what you suggest. If you have to lie to make a point, you're the biggest loser. Congratulations!

 

[Dear Wiggo]

I never claimed to be perfect in punctuation,

Ah I misunderstood what you meant by "stickler for language usage". Here I thought you meant the written or spoken expression of a language - which would include its grammar and its vernacular.

Sorry man, I'm a stickler for language usage, and that isn't the right word. In any way. The Clinic isn't people, and as such, cannot be inherently anything unless there is something inherent in the code, and even if there is, it doesn't have anything to do with Froome.

Good to be reminded that the clinic isn't people.

 

[ChewbaccaD]

Ah I misunderstood what you meant by "stickler for language usage". Here I thought you meant the written or spoken expression of a language - which would include its grammar and its vernacular.



Good to be reminded that the clinic isn't people.

Okay, fine Wiggo, you're too f*&king stupid to properly use the word "inherent" and I am hypocritical. The world is all in the proper place now.

Edit: And no, I was specifically referring to the proper usage of a word in context of its actual meaning, and NOT grammar or punctuation. But if it makes you feel better about being a moron, flail away dude.

 

[Dear Wiggo]

Okay, fine Wiggo, you're too f*&king stupid to properly use the word "inherent" and I am hypocritical. The world is all in the proper place now.

You are inherently belligerent, and your posts tend to attack other posters, as is evidenced by the scaling up of your response now to cussing and the like.

Do you feel attacked by someone quoting you in context? Is that why you feel the need to retaliate so vehemently?

 

[ChewbaccaD]

You are inherently belligerent, and your posts tend to attack other posters, as is evidenced by the scaling up of your response now to cussing and the like.

Do you feel attacked by someone quoting you in context? Is that why you feel the need to retaliate so vehemently?

You feel the need to interject yourself into something that had no reference to you, but you keep pretending it wasn't personal...goodnight dude. Have fun with your retaliation...and inability to see the irony of your own posts. I wouldn't expect anything else from you.

 

[Dear Wiggo]

You feel the need to interject yourself into something that had no reference to you, but you keep pretending it wasn't personal...goodnight dude. Have fun with your retaliation...and inability to see the irony of your own posts. I wouldn't expect anything else from you.

Ah so now you're telling me I can't post without your say so. Gotcha.

 

[sniper]

Not really. In order to be a fan of the sport most need to suspend analysis and just enjoy the racing. Lets face it, Contador is a very entertaining bike racer.

what's your personal take on his 2014 season?
have you heard any rumors about docs (is he still hanging out with pepe?), tenerife, or de jongh?
as you seem to know some guys from Garmin, i'd be curious, have you by any chance heard any complaints from (members of) that team (or from others) about Contador ripping up the field?

 

[laurel1969]

No it doesn't, as he explained he accepts (as we all do) all the top guys are doping and he simply has a favourite out of those. It's not so hard to understand. The fact that your guy is not anywhere near top dog anymore and is unlikely to be ever again until Contador calls it a day, is something you will just simply have to deal with, or maybe switch to watching a non doping sport (good luck with that).

I haven't had a 'guy' since the 80's, and one of the last ones is now a lady. Judging by your avatar I think you'll know who I mean.

Back to the point, your argument doesn't work because if everybody accepted that all top players are cheating but some are just better to watch then why talk about doping at all? This is a doping board. If it was on the prr board I'd join in on Contador's side.

 

[Berzin]

Stop with the name-calling and personal attacks.

Also, this isn't the Sky thread. Any more mention here of their supposed, alleged doping program will be deleted.

 

[sniper]

I haven't had a 'guy' since the 80's, and one of the last ones is now a lady. Judging by your avatar I think you'll know who I mean.

Back to the point, your argument doesn't work because if everybody accepted that all top players are cheating but some are just better to watch then why talk about doping at all? This is a doping board. If it was on the prr board I'd join in on Contador's side.

it's not difficult these days to join in on Contador's side.
Sky hired Walsh, Zorzoli and Cookson's son. Saxo let the results speak for them.

 

[laurel1969]

Not sure I understand the point you are making.

 

[djpbaltimore]

You sure you saw a Vino love in on here after the Olympics? The last one of those was 2012, so just out of interest what username were you using then?

I can only speak for myself, but I lurked on the forum for many years before signing up for an account and posting. I imagine others have done the same.

it's not difficult these days to join in on Contador's side.
Sky hired Walsh, Zorzoli and Cookson's son. Saxo let the results speak for them.

I would love to see Contador release his blood values for these past three weeks, but, realistically, the odds of that happening are slim and none. I will give him credit for not putting up an 8 finger salute this year (unless I missed it).

 

[hrotha]

it's not difficult these days to join in on Contador's side.
Sky hired Walsh, Zorzoli and Cookson's son. Saxo let the results speak for them.

Tinkoff also hired De Jongh.