Windy Mountain

Page 16 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
JMBeaushrimp said:
I knew an American sprinter in the 80s who said that he crashed once, and was going so fast that the sparks from his bike actually lit the paint and the tires on fire...

Mayo's steel cranks are in the same category of story...

Yes, possible, some folk law in all of this.

That sad part of that amazing day in cycling history is France 2 wouldn't show the ITT live. Its on tape somewhere with only about 15 minutes even see the light of day.

It will go down in history with the Zapruder film as lost achieves.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,923
25,680
Taxus4a said:
I am not goint to translate
If you aren't, then leave the post in the Spanish forum...
I understand when people leave small sentences in their original language, but a whole post? If you're here to make a point, then at least do it in a language everyone can understand.
 
Sep 30, 2011
9,560
9
17,495
Eshnar said:
If you aren't, then leave the post in the Spanish forum...
I understand when people leave small sentences in their original language, but a whole post? If you're here to make a point, then at least do it in a language everyone can understand.

Eshnar,now now... your are being rude, you are a mod and you should translate it for him. :D :p.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,140
29,771
28,180
Eshnar said:
If you aren't, then leave the post in the Spanish forum...
I understand when people leave small sentences in their original language, but a whole post? If you're here to make a point, then at least do it in a language everyone can understand.

Does that also count for his 'English'?
 
Aug 12, 2012
6,996
1,011
20,680
Eshnar said:
If you aren't, then leave the post in the Spanish forum...
I understand when people leave small sentences in their original language, but a whole post? If you're here to make a point, then at least do it in a language everyone can understand.

the spanish part wanst important, seconds and names are the same in spanish, the important things I translated.

Detele only the spanish part, you deleted more.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
the sceptic said:
Just saw this on twitter.. headwind from Chalet apparently. :eek:

Yup, side/headwind from the Chalet is pretty clear in all the videos. That would mean the majority of the climb had a tailwind.

Thanks for proving my point
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Race Radio said:
Yup, side/headwind from the Chalet is pretty clear in all the videos. That would mean the majority of the climb had a tailwind.

Thanks for proving my point

Didnt you say 80% had a tailwind?

Seems hard to achieve with headwind the last 7 km.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,140
29,771
28,180
Froome's time (the one that was only 2'' from Armstrong) was of the last 15.65km, so I don't get why you use the 21km segment.

Since Chalet is a little more than 6km from the top, only the first ~9.5km was not in the headwind section. What's also clear is that the first section is very steep, protected from wind by the forest and ridden by Froome almost entirely in the wheel of a dom, so with only minimal impact from wind. The second section however is not so steep, very exposed and ridden by Froome almost entirely with his nose in the wind.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
the sceptic said:
Didnt you say 80% had a tailwind?

Seems hard to achieve with headwind the last 7 km.

The climb is 22km. From the turn it is 6 km with lots of turns that alternate cross/head/tail. 4-5km of 22km was headwind.

Thanks for the link. It supports what I have been saying all along. Good that we can finally put this to rest.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,595
8,457
28,180
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
ScienceIsCool said:
You're being silly. The facts, as measured by the instruments at weather stations surrounding Ventoux (Bedoin, Sault, Malaucene) put the wind at anywhere between North and North-West.

To have the winds one or two kilometers away blowing in the exact opposite direction is somewhere between absurd to impossible.

Beliefs need to conform to reality. No matter what I, you, or anyone else want to believe, the winds were blowing from the north. This puts the *average* prevailing wind at a crosswind on the lower slopes and a headwind on the upper slopes.

John Swanson

ScienceIsCool said:
This is so silly. Human perception (measuring wind via subtle video clues) is crap. I've spent several years, recently, studying human perception of visual stimulus as part of my work responsibilities. It's generally awful when it comes to precision. I sincerely doubt anybody could pick wind direction due to a video that is in the same plane as the indicator (i.e., watching a flag).

Weather instrumentation, with fantastic precision and accuracy, say the wind was coming anywhere from north to north-west at roughly 20 km/hr. The features of the mountain could have shifted that from N-NW to a westerly wind, but that's about it.

No matter what we perceive, or would like to think, we must accept that the wind was coming from the north that day.

John Swanson

ScienceIsCool said:
Unless you have a weather station with the proper meteorological equipment. Then it's dead simple. Such weather stations surrounding Ventoux (i.e., Malaucene, Bedoin, Sault) all reported N-NW winds at 20 km/hr at the time of the race.

Effects of the mountain slopes would have - at best - put the winds coming from the west. Look at a map and you will see that this makes a tailwind coming into Bedoin, a cross-wind in the forest, and a headwind past Chalet Reynaud.

This is actual data from real, live instruments. No eyeballing it from a video. Not sure why there's any debate.

John Swanson

Good posts John Swanson.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Netserk said:
Froome's time (the one that was only 2'' from Armstrong) was of the last 15.65km, so I don't get why you use the 21km segment.
.

Yes, I do think having a tailwind for the majority of the climb, and the run in to Bedoin, does effect how fresh the riders are in the last 5km. Not sure why anyone would think that it didn't.

Some have tried to twist what I have written. I have said many times Froome's attacks that day were mutant.....but the variables make it hard to use the climb for normal calculations. I, and many others, prefer the Semnoz.

I do think Ventoux showed Froome might be a bit better climber then Quintana. From that I think we can deduce that if he did not have a bad day on Alp d'Huez or did not already have the Tour wrapped up on the Semnoz he could have put out some crazy numbers on climbs with fewer variables.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Race Radio said:
please, take some time to look at a map and read what was actually written instead of what some obsessed troll writes.

Thanks

Im not sure why it is so important to you that there was a tailwind for 80% of the climb. But it seems impossible to me with the wind coming from the north.
 

Latest posts