World Championship 2025: Men’s ITT, September 21

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I have no clue about this stuff but could this have a significant impact on the aero (dis)advantage of the top TT riders or would that impact be negligible?

I'm very curious about this TT. I really have no idea what to expect. I feel like it's a TT unlike any we have seen in recent years. It's at altitude, it has a significant amount of altitude meters but the gradients are mostly shallow and it looks completely non-technical on big wide roads.

I guess a podium consisting of Remco, Pogi and Vine would make the most sense but I have no clue about the order. I do hope Remco comes out on top though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlpRaid
I have no clue about this stuff but could this have a significant impact on the aero (dis)advantage of the top TT riders or would that impact be negligible?

I'm very curious about this TT. I really have no idea what to expect. I feel like it's a TT unlike any we have seen in recent years. It's at altitude, it has a significant amount of altitude meters but the gradients are mostly shallow and it looks completely non-technical on big wide roads.

I guess a podium consisting of Remco, Pogi and Vine would make the most sense but I have no clue about the order. I do hope Remco comes out on top though.
It would be funny to see Vine take it thanks to the extremely wide roads and the course not being technical. I think he could've been close last year without the crash.
 
Not a fan of the course. I like my TTs to have some flat in them.
Agree - it's the opposite to 2013 editions Montecatini/Pistoia - Firenze.
Personally, I like the versions that have it all;
Short technical sections, steep ramps, fast descents, semi-technical descents, semi-long climbs and then most likely: 10k pancake flat pure straights in both ends, all the spicy stuff put in between.
 
I have no clue about this stuff but could this have a significant impact on the aero (dis)advantage of the top TT riders or would that impact be negligible?

I'm very curious about this TT. I really have no idea what to expect. I feel like it's a TT unlike any we have seen in recent years. It's at altitude, it has a significant amount of altitude meters but the gradients are mostly shallow and it looks completely non-technical on big wide roads.

I guess a podium consisting of Remco, Pogi and Vine would make the most sense but I have no clue about the order. I do hope Remco comes out on top though.
I think changes in air resistance is of negligible importance between riders. How well the riders are currently adapted to altitude and less oxygen should matter far more.
 
I think changes in air resistance is of negligible importance between riders. How well the riders are currently adapted to altitude and less oxygen should matter far more.
Above ~1,500 m above sea level as is the situation for upcoming worlds, you can only just start to have measurable effects compared to a similar event at sea level, especially if you are not acclimatized.

It seems like 1995 Duitima has been completely forgotten here?

The route between Tunja and Duitima took place between (afair) 2550-2850 m above sea level.
Consequently MUCH harder for the body, especially in longer efforts: VO2max drops, you get higher heart rate (for a given power), you increase pulse and lactic acid faster, and recovery often takes longer and therefore performance-limiting for even well-trained elite level.

Regarding the aerodynamics and an extremely streamlined low-slung style like Remco vs. a much more upright position.
In a strong headwind, Remco has a colossal advantage.
In thin air and calm, the possibility of total air intake, VO2 max and overall total oxygen intake has a colossal advantage in the latter terrain.

The 2025 Rwanda ITT is not the 1995 Duitima ITT.
And if there turn out to be strong headwinds, Remco will still have a much greater advantage in Rwanda than if he were in his prime in a 1995 Duitima ITT.
 
Last edited:
Okay guys, I dug deep into the science.

This WC being practically at the equator, it means that gravity is weaker due to the larger centrifugal force and the bulge of the Earth meaning you're further away from the Earth's core, g is only 9.77 instead of 9.81, and therefor Evenepoel should easily win and if he doesn't he has absolutely no excuses.
So, those who can't copy Remco's low TT position will not be able to clinge to Earth and are deemed to be lost in space?
Sounds like a thriller! :eek:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
Okay guys, I dug deep into the science.

This WC being practically at the equator, it means that gravity is weaker due to the larger centrifugal force and the bulge of the Earth meaning you're further away from the Earth's core, g is only 9.77 instead of 9.81, and therefor Evenepoel should easily win and if he doesn't he has absolutely no excuses.

10/10

Even Fatco should crush Pogenheimer on those hills!
 
I understand part, I just didn't understand why Red Rick said faster on flat sections but slower uphill. His follow up post explained it.

Less oxygen mean less power. When climbing it's very important (gravity is the main opponent so speed decreases almost proportionally to power on steep sections). However, on flat speed decreases more slowly vs power (between square and cube root) and it's compensated by thinner air (less resistive force so speed can actually rise a bit despite lower power).
 
Okay guys, I dug deep into the science.

This WC being practically at the equator, it means that gravity is weaker due to the larger centrifugal force and the bulge of the Earth meaning you're further away from the Earth's core, g is only 9.77 instead of 9.81, and therefor Evenepoel should easily win and if he doesn't he has absolutely no excuses.

Larger centrifugal force?! That doesn't bode well for Remco's cornering!
 
Wonder if anyone is going to use a Rog Tokyo Olympics strategy of going full gas on every climb, but freewheeling resting on every descent. I remember him passing riders on every climb, but then being caught periodically on the downhill by the rider he had just passed.
 
Honestly, I don't even know anymore. One comment someone says it's really hilly, the next someone says it's not that hilly at all. So now I have no idea.
It’s the same amount of climbing as Tokyo but 3.6km shorter. 2021 Vuelta stage 21 was 6.8km shorter but with the same climbing/km.

I don’t know if I’d call either of those super hilly, but they definitely qualify as hilly TTs more than flat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Wonder if anyone is going to use a Rog Tokyo Olympics strategy of going full gas on every climb, but freewheeling resting on every descent. I remember him passing riders on every climb, but then being caught periodically on the downhill by the rider he had just passed.

Maybe. It probably makes sense to go at 105-110% of one's threshold on climbs and 90-95% elsewhere cause one can gain relatively more on climbs (due to laws of physics) plus descents can provide a short recovery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlpRaid