It's 8 for 1st to 10th nation ranked, 6 for 11th to 20th, 4 for 21st to 30th and 1 fo 31st to 50th.Climbing said:I thought it was 8 as well, but apparently it's 7?
Seven of them have already achieved a top-10 in Il Lombardia. Four of them have already achieved a top-5 in that particular race.Netserk said:Depending on form, you'd expect at least six of these (they have 8 spots, right?):
Julian Alaphilippe
Romain Bardet
Warren Barguil
Lilian Calmejane
Tony Gallopin
Pierre Latour
Thibaut Pinot
Alexis Vuillermoz
Frightening team.
Yeah I linked that myself some pages ago, but somebody said it wasn't correct.Nirvana said:It's 8 for 1st to 10th nation ranked, 6 for 11th to 20th, 4 for 21st to 30th and 1 fo 31st to 50th.Climbing said:I thought it was 8 as well, but apparently it's 7?
http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/News/18/54/12/CMR-Syst%C3%A8medequalification2018-ENG_English.PDF
Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
Obviously Sagan can't win because nobody has ever won 4 time in a row, so that can't happen.Gigs_98 said:Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
![]()
Gigs_98 said:Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
![]()
This is silly. Of course it's illogical. So do you think the bookies are going to rate Slovakia's chances higher at Worlds this year than Colombia's? What about Germany? USA? Australia? All have a better Worlds record.Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
![]()
So what part of "based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race" you don't understand?
What part of that is illogical? Please tell me!
Is it because in your option history should never be taken into consideration when talking the "likeliness" of future results? Isn't that what the bookies do?
No it's just that this route is one of the hardest worlds routes ever and that Colombian cycling has taken a major step forward in the last decade. It doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out that results on routes like in Doha don't tell you a lot about this race. If you don't think all the Colombian climbers could cause carnage on this route because of history, I can't help youJancouver said:Gigs_98 said:Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:Gigs_98 said:I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.Red Rick said:I hardly call that frightening.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
![]()
So what part of "based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race" you don't understand?
What part of that is illogical? Please tell me!
Is it because in your option history should never be taken into consideration when talking the "likeliness" of future results? Isn't that what the bookies do?
[/quote]Gigs_98 said:No it's just that this route is one of the hardest worlds routes ever and that Colombian cycling has taken a major step forward in the last decade. It doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out that results on routes like in Doha don't tell you a lot about this race. If you don't think all the Colombian climbers could cause carnage on this route because of history, I can't help youJancouver said:Gigs_98 said:Can logic get any less flawless?Jancouver said:3101#p2243101]Gigs_98[/url]"]
I agree, if Colombia really wanted to they could pretty much drop half of the french team in the first lap. Ofc not a bad team either, but there will surely be stronger ones.
Colombia?
The same Colombia that has ZERO medals from the WC?
Do you realize they never even managed to get on the podium?
Is that the Colombia you are talking about?
Well, perhaps they can drop some riders on the first climb, but other than that, based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race.
Edit: anyway, there is a better chance of Sagan winning this race than anybody from Colombia![]()
![]()
So what part of "based on history, it is very unlikely they will win or even podium this race" you don't understand?
What part of that is illogical? Please tell me!
Is it because in your option history should never be taken into consideration when talking the "likeliness" of future results? Isn't that what the bookies do?
Are you referring to this post?Climbing said:Yeah I linked that myself some pages ago, but somebody said it wasn't correct.Nirvana said:It's 8 for 1st to 10th nation ranked, 6 for 11th to 20th, 4 for 21st to 30th and 1 fo 31st to 50th.Climbing said:I thought it was 8 as well, but apparently it's 7?
http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/News/18/54/12/CMR-Syst%C3%A8medequalification2018-ENG_English.PDF
Can make quite a bit of a difference.
I think Columbia has as strong a chance as any team aside from Spain and Italy. They can create chaos from the start if they’d like. Put Pantano or Atapuma in the break and then try and go long with Quintana. Then you have Uran and Chaves to play for the finale. Yeah, they don’t have great sprinters but after 7 hours and 5000m of climbing I think the differences get neutralized a bit.Koronin said:Colombia could get a podium however, they need to go with one leader and maybe one plan B. However, if it's a free for all and riders refusing to work for each other, again they will be extremely lucky if they get a podium.
I actually agree with Jancouver that Sagan has as good of a shot at winning the worlds this year as a rider from Colombia has, and that isn't a very good chance.
Durden93 said:I think Columbia has as strong a chance as any team aside from Spain and Italy. They can create chaos from the start if they’d like. Put Pantano or Atapuma in the break and then try and go long with Quintana. Then you have Uran and Chaves to play for the finale. Yeah, they don’t have great sprinters but after 7 hours and 5000m of climbing I think the differences get neutralized a bit.Koronin said:Colombia could get a podium however, they need to go with one leader and maybe one plan B. However, if it's a free for all and riders refusing to work for each other, again they will be extremely lucky if they get a podium.
I actually agree with Jancouver that Sagan has as good of a shot at winning the worlds this year as a rider from Colombia has, and that isn't a very good chance.
As for history, I don’t think Colombia’s lack of previous WC success really factors in here. Since 1995 there have only really been 3 mountainous WCs and by the 90s Colombia lacked the star power it did in the 80s for reasons which I shall not mention.
Koronin said:Durden93 said:I think Columbia has as strong a chance as any team aside from Spain and Italy. They can create chaos from the start if they’d like. Put Pantano or Atapuma in the break and then try and go long with Quintana. Then you have Uran and Chaves to play for the finale. Yeah, they don’t have great sprinters but after 7 hours and 5000m of climbing I think the differences get neutralized a bit.Koronin said:Colombia could get a podium however, they need to go with one leader and maybe one plan B. However, if it's a free for all and riders refusing to work for each other, again they will be extremely lucky if they get a podium.
I actually agree with Jancouver that Sagan has as good of a shot at winning the worlds this year as a rider from Colombia has, and that isn't a very good chance.
As for history, I don’t think Colombia’s lack of previous WC success really factors in here. Since 1995 there have only really been 3 mountainous WCs and by the 90s Colombia lacked the star power it did in the 80s for reasons which I shall not mention.
Thus they had better hope they aren't coming to the finish with Nibali and Valverde. Valverde will still have his sprint no matter how many KMs they've just raced and Nibali has an OK sprint, although nothing compared to Valverde's.
Max Rockatansky said:ORF reports, that there are still 3,2 Mio. Euros missing to finance this event. Hello Qatar...
Max Rockatansky said:Max Rockatansky said:ORF reports, that there are still 3,2 Mio. Euros missing to finance this event. Hello Qatar...
http://www.tt.com/sport/sportreport/14105466-91/die-rad-wm-in-innsbrucktirol-eine-herkulesaufgabe.csp
Here are some numbers. They are reporting, that they will close two major deals soon.
It's quite interesting. I found an article for the 2011 World Championships with Hamburg thinking about becoming a candidate. That article stated, that the WRR would cost 6 Mio. Euros. Now we are at almost 13 Mio. Bergen was at 20 Mio. Euros and they failed hard to bring that money to the table. Vicenza 2020 is out for money reasons. Does anybody have an idea, why these events have become so expensive so fast? Security issues maybe? Or has UCI gone into FIFA mode?
That could also become a problem fro France.Jancouver said:Tactically, the only Colombian that has any chance is Sergio Henao. Tactics are important and perhaps even the reason why they never got on the podium.
... too many chiefs not enough indians
It's gonna be a weird, weird worlds cause it's so tough nobody really has an idea what will happen.Mayomaniac said:That could also become a problem fro France.Jancouver said:Tactically, the only Colombian that has any chance is Sergio Henao. Tactics are important and perhaps even the reason why they never got on the podium.
... too many chiefs not enough indians
Ala will be the leader, but Bardet, Barguil and Pinot will all have their own ambitions.
Valv.Piti said:I reckon Spain also will have a pretty good team for the Worlds. They have produced some very good riders lately who have developed better than some might have expected - many of them are not spectacular, but can play the role of great domestiques for Valverde and possibly Landa who also can win: Bilbao, Cruz, Fraile, Soler, Mas, Ion, Gorka, Luis Leon, Verona, Rosón...
