Havent got the link ....but .. anyone see Roger serve at that guys head and hiy the can off ...... modern day "whats his name" with the arrow and apple !!!!!
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Barracuda said:Havent got the link ....but .. anyone see Roger serve at that guys head and hiy the can off ...... modern day "whats his name" with the arrow and apple !!!!!
Barracuda said:Havent got the link ....but .. anyone see Roger serve at that guys head and hiy the can off ...... modern day "whats his name" with the arrow and apple !!!!!
al_pacino said:William Tell.
unfortunately I do scent a touch of fakeness with this.
Michielveedeebee said:maybe fake because it is at the gilette advertising site but it still looks nice!
catmiles said:Saw it on SKY news this morning, looks unbelievable and wouldnt surprise me if it was fake... apparently he avoided the question...
la.margna said:so to make us believe they shall show the 25 attempts during which Roger didn't hit the can or his head or whatever
[/URL]
The Hitch said:I cant believe people are actually contemplating the possibility that this might be real.
So what, federer is such a cool guy that he walks around David Blaine style in a suit with his Wilson Six.One Tour BLX racket, performing tennis tricks on amazed mortals. And as it happens, as he is showing off, a proffessional camera man happens to be present at the location, and happens to start filming just as Federer starts talking about Hawk Eye. Then of all the millions of individuals who could potentialy get hold of or hear about the incident, Gillete, the shaving company, which happens to have a large sponsorship deal with Federer dating back years, gets hold of the tape and nobody in the world heard anything about it.
And as far as the " the commercial was planned, but the trick was real" idea goes, Federers years of serve training have taught him how to correctly get a ball into a 4 by 6 metre service box not how to blast cans of peoples heads.
The service motion he is using is precisely for that. Getting the ball into the service box. The angle Federers serve in the ad goes, it would end up landing outside the baseline, and would require a different technique to the one federer has mastered.
and certainatly not in a suit twice in a row.Not to mention magicians have done similar but better tricks without the aide of cameras, and adverts have a history of decieving viewers.
The Hitch said:I cant believe people are actually contemplating the possibility that this might be real.
So what, federer is such a cool guy that he walks around David Blaine style in a suit with his Wilson Six.One Tour BLX racket, performing tennis tricks on amazed mortals. And as it happens, as he is showing off, a proffessional camera man happens to be present at the location, and happens to start filming just as Federer starts talking about Hawk Eye. Then of all the millions of individuals who could potentialy get hold of or hear about the incident, Gillete, the shaving company, which happens to have a large sponsorship deal with Federer dating back years, gets hold of the tape and nobody in the world heard anything about it.
And as far as the " the commercial was planned, but the trick was real" idea goes, Federers years of serve training have taught him how to correctly get a ball into a 4 by 6 metre service box not how to blast cans of peoples heads.
The service motion he is using is precisely for that. Getting the ball into the service box. The angle Federers serve in the ad goes, it would end up landing outside the baseline, and would require a different technique to the one federer has mastered.
and certainatly not in a suit twice in a row...
PCutter said:I think people are focussed on the wrong person in this real/fake discussion on the ad. Maybe Fed can hit a can with a serve, maybe he can't.....but the idea that some random floor assistant for an ad wouldn't flinch as a ball is hit directly at his head at 150kh/h is plainly a sign of techno trickery. IMO
la.margna said:who knows. often if too good to be true it also turns out that way.
so to make us believe they shall show the 25 attempts during which Roger didn't hit the can or his head or whatever
but then again, if Roger turns out to be a faker or cheater... hard to imagine...
I guess they had a clear idea to do the clip this way but whether it is edited or real only God and Roger knows...
In any way... cool video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTl3U6aSd2w&hd=1