Echoes said:rhubroma said:I'm well aware of the iter of global capitalism. Relocation of industry was long taking place before the Euro, as were the dismantling of trade barriers in the name of liberalism.
So what, it took place before (long? 10 years before) the euro. Globalization started with the Uruguay Round and the GATT agreement in the early nineties, completed by the Maastricht Treaty, which also officialized the common currency.
Article 63
(ex Article 56 TEC)
1. Within the framework of the provisions set out in this Chapter, all restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited.
2. Within the framework of the provisions set out in this Chapter, all restrictions on payments between Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited.
So yes it has to do with the EU. But more importantly the euro having been a strong currency, very expansive compared to the dollar, for many years (and still is too expansive today) prevents our industry to export (except a few German factories who have a close to monopoly situation in several sectors) because our industry is no longer competitive on the Asian market or so. Hence the industry relocates. Strong euro was a relocation premium, that's not Echoes speaking it's Louis Gallois, manager of Airbus.
rhubroma said:This is precisely the well from which FN draws its water, as does Beppe Grillo and the Lega Nord in Italy, Farnge in Britain - so you're in good company - while at the fringe looms the various Podemos and then there are the pirates. The system is based on consensus, however, which only knows how to plan for the next elections. But in a tripartite system FN's consensus has grown by 6%, which is not unsubstantial. Come on, Marine's platform has always been staunchly anti-EU.
What a salad! The usual left-wing trick. You are anti-EU, so you are pro-FN while neither the FN, nor the Lega Nord (far from that), nor Beppe Grillo, nor Podemos, nor the Pirates have EVER EVER EVER EVER and EVER planned to EXIT the EU. NEVER !! Only Farage wants out but still to stay in NATO, so now even with him, I am in bad company. Besides, he wants a veil ban towards Muslim women, he should please you. I've read all of the FN's "statements of principles" at every elections since Marine became its president. This does not exist. So no, her platform has never been anti-EU. Even on the euro, she's wishy-washy. On her "statement of principles" for the 2012 presidential elections, the word "euro" did not even get a mention. It's logical. The only legal way out of the Eurozone is getting out of the whole EU by art.50 of the TFEU but since Marine never planned to leave the EU, how can she plan a Eurozone exit? It's impossible. That means she's deceiving her voters. That means she's closer to you, the Europeist than to me. The dilemma is binary. You stay or you get out (of the EU). I want to get out. All parties from far-right to far-left want to stay, just like you.
Oh and no, the FN has not grown. Statisticians have long noticed that the FN was unable to exceed a threshold of 14% of subscribers. They still did not manage that. They are slightly above 13%. They only won because of the 52% abstention (+ blank or null votes)[which is a very good thing, I also abstain most of the time]. But in absolute figures, they have not won any more voters.
rhubroma said:Your concept of "working class authoritarianism" only has validity to (losing) monarchists like yourself, which is eminently hypocritical.
Lol Seymour Martin Lipset, a monarchist?He was a socialist reformed to "centrist".
Christopher Lasch in "The Revolt of the Elites" argued:
The masses today have lost interest in revolution. Indeed, their political instincts are demonstrably more conservative than those of their self-appointed spokesmen and would-be liberators. It is the working and lower middle classes, after all, who favor limits on abortion, cling to the two-parent family as a source of stability in a turbulent world, resist experiments with ‘alternative lifestyles,’ and harbor deep reservations about affirmative action and other ventures in large-scale social engineering.
Deal with it. And don't claim Lasch was a monarchist because Blutto should then claim you are making him "roll in his grave." But he won't say that, don't worry. Because you are a cool leftist.
rhubroma said:Yours is authoritarianism tout court and consequently fascist.
Yes, authoritarianism is a synonym for fascism as anyone knows.
rhubroma said:And this is where your siding with the working class, as you view it, is a perversion of its very struggle for emancipation. No, Ehcoes, you don't side with the working class, but a return of Manzoni's Innominato and clerical reign over the serfs.
Yes, serfdom was abolished by the Enlightenment and by the 1789 revolution as anyone knows. The working class was a lot better protected by the Old Regime than by their successors. History should tell. The worst century for the working class in the 19th one. Every historian knows that.
blutto said:....find below a post from the US Politics thread....and do remember Trump is real popular among the, uhhh, general populace...
Trump is not popular among the general populace because the general populace no longer votes in the US. How great was the abstention rate at the last elections? Over 60% I think. But compared to Democrats, the Republicans are much closer to what the working class expects from a US President. You only need to read the election maps at every elections to understand. Democrats gets the Rich coastal states (Atlantic or Pacific), Republicans get the hard-working heartland.
Well globilzastion started long before that Echoes. The Euro cost has to do with US wanting to keep the dollar cheap. The dissatisfaction with the voting public is symetrical to their innabilty to effect change. It's the syndrome of the struggling worker occupying the place with the fascists like you who believe they can articulate a lost purity that never was pure, as I have already said.
Like Trump, you are a dangerous imbecile and not worth more attention.
Having said that I never brought up Lasch, but if you insist he is a reactionary and destined, like all reactionaries, to sucumb to the hands by which plastic history is modeled by humans. If not, the apocalypse. I gather you welcome just such a prospect. If such hands bring that about then your paranoia had some sinister sense.
I don't really care one way or the other.
