....find below a reference to a blow Canada recently made against Islamic radicalization in general and ISIS in particular....a blow that is based on an idea not much discussed in the Western press, which concentrates it seems on bombing the crap out of things and ratcheting up the tension....which oddly enough is a great recruiting tool for ISIS and related groups ( which as far as I'm concerned includes everyone who is looking to create problems they can solve with bombs )...this from Mitch Potter of The Toronto Star...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Canada as a whole, and not just the new Trudeau government, deserves huge credit for the courageous and heartening scenes this week from Pearson airport. In our collective welcome for the first wave of incoming Syrian refugees, we planted our flag uniquely deep in the heart of the “grey zone,” claiming it in the name of coexistence.
The grey zone — a term that emerged last February in the Islamic State propaganda magazine, Dabiq — denotes that huge and overwhelming swath of Muslims in the West who aren’t interested in what Islamic State is selling. In its quest for a world with two camps — caliphate versus crusaders — Islamic State needs to squeeze co-existence out of the equation.
AuthorLaila Lalami said it best in the New York Times Magazine last month, describing how the attacks in Paris were designed precisely to provoke the hate-stoking political rhetoric that followed, placing every Muslim in the West under suspicion and further diminishing the grey zone. “Every time the gray zone recedes, ISIS gains ground,” wrote Lalami.
Canada’s stand on refugees, I would argue, is winning back some serious grey."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
....and oh this quick overview of the history behind the current Syrian situation....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-baath-party-as-the-west-doesnt-want-you-to-know-it/5319120
...which contains the following....
"After Hussein’s regime was toppled by the Coalition, the Ba’ath Party was outlawed in Iraq, an act which some suggest helped fuel Sunni elements of the insurgency that followed.
And now, it seems, decision-makers in the West have decided that it is the turn of Syria’s Ba’athists to fall. While many could look at Iraq and say with great confidence that Iraq was a resource grab targeting Iraq’s oil, as well as a money making exercise for mercenary companies, arms manufacturers, mega-corporations like Halliburton and its subsidiaries, and the banking cartels, Syria is different. Syria produces oil, yes, but nowhere near the scale that Iraq does.
Syria’s closeness with Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah will obviously stand out as a reason why the US, Israel, the EU, and the GCC want Assad’s government gone. But factoring in the Ba’ath Party’s three objectives of secularism, socialism, and pan-Arab unification, we see more ideological reasons, as well as the motivation for the militias operating under the Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood umbrellas.
Starting with pan-Arab unification, one is reminded of the line “united we stand, divided we fall”. A united Arab people is an idea that is utterly intolerable to the colonialists of the West, who rely on division and playing indigenous peoples off against each other to get their way in the region, allowing the blood to flow while they go about their business."
Cheers