fpcyclingn said:
Maybe it just shows your foresight fails? Maybe you should have actually considered the pre-tour evidence instead of making ridiculous assumptions like all the haters on this board do (whether you are a hater or not).
It was beyond obvious before the tour even started that LA was going to be a contender. He said it himself, and former podium finishers said it as well.
Oh, but I forgot... CN armchair warriors are apparently smarter than LA and the peleton.
P.S. Post count means nothing, except that you waste more valuable life time on the internet running your mouth than I do.
1. pre-tour evidence: 12th in the giro with mediocre climbing and a fairly underwhelming time trial.
2. calling yourself a contender ≠ being a contender. wiggins just picked himself for the top 10. remember when basso was going to win the giro this year?
3. beyond obvious? here's a quote form a new york times article (from lance himself): "The trick is trying to be a responsible teammate and co-leader and understand that Alberto could not just be stronger, but could be a lot stronger,” Armstrong said of Contador.
here's the link. lance himself had doubts. or is playing mad psych-ops. either way. it's hardly obvious.
4. smarter than LA? never claimed to be. but i did offer opinions on strategy on a forum topic soliciting opinions on strategy. was that wrong?
5. i type with my hands, not my mouth. so it's not running.
6. is criticizing message board commenting via message board commenting better than message board commenting itself? the world may never know.
7. so what's your point? no one should offer opinions on anything ever? come on, scro.