100th Ronde Van Vlaanderen - April 3rd, 2016 - 255.9k

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

The new King of Flanders will come from what team?

  • Another team

    Votes: 10 7.1%
  • Etixx

    Votes: 10 7.1%
  • Lotto Soudal

    Votes: 7 5.0%
  • Trek

    Votes: 45 32.1%
  • Sky

    Votes: 15 10.7%
  • Tinkoff

    Votes: 30 21.4%
  • LottoNL

    Votes: 7 5.0%
  • BMC

    Votes: 8 5.7%
  • Katusha

    Votes: 6 4.3%
  • Astana

    Votes: 2 1.4%

  • Total voters
    140
  • Poll closed .
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
let's just say they had no interest whatsoever in watching the womans race and would much rather watch 150 km men race than having to watch the final 30 km of the woman race. sporza trying to be so politically correct is pathetic and thank god those analysts didn't join in
 
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races where you can watch the one you prefer without being forced to have that experience compromised with a split screen.
 
Re:

Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
 
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
Afaik they will be doing forced split screens.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
they are forcing people to watch the womans race but instead they will all zap to different stations not showing the womans race but claim later on they tried and how morally correct they were but just that nobody cares about woman cycling. pretty ridiculous in my book
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Re: Re:

Netserk said:
LaFlorecita said:
Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
Afaik they will be doing forced split screens.
that's even worse. than it's no point in switching channels
 
Re: Re:

Netserk said:
LaFlorecita said:
Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
Afaik they will be doing forced split screens.


sporza are showing the mens race on one channel and the womens race on the other
 
Re: Re:

Billie said:
Netserk said:
LaFlorecita said:
Netserk said:
It is indeed ridiculous. They don't have to worsen one product (coverage of the men's race) just because the other is inferior.

Segregation itself is discrimination, so the 'fair' thing would be to only have one race... Or at least admit that one is inferior to the other, and that it is two different races.
In what way are they worsening the coverage of the men's race by showing the women's race? Because viewing figures for the men's race will go down for an hour? :confused:
Afaik they will be doing forced split screens.


sporza are showing the mens race on one channel and the womens race on the other
Ahh, thanks. When I read this:

http://inrng.com/2016/04/ronde-van-vlaanderen-preview

"The Women’s Race will be on TV too as a split screen and in full as a non geo-restricted internet stream, a great example to set for other races. The coverage will show the race over Kanarieberg, Kruisberg and Hotond, then the Oude Kwaremont and Paterberg before the run to Oudenaarde live between 2.00-3.00pm. Enjoy the preview over at cyclingtips."

I took it to mean it would be on the same channel.
 
Jul 5, 2011
858
0
0
156 k's to go. Break has just over 4 minutes. Seems to be someone in no mans land. Teams generally sharing the work at the front of the peloton at present. Sorry dont know Flemish.