dlwssonic said:Thanks, had a close fight with you. You did great too.
Im honored to be the first ever GT cq winner!!
Now time to put it in my signature
Good idea. People quickly forget the others on the podium so I'll do the same.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
dlwssonic said:Thanks, had a close fight with you. You did great too.
Im honored to be the first ever GT cq winner!!
Now time to put it in my signature
asdfgh101 said:Will we have more purchasing power for the TDF game? 4k will hopefully be enough to allow people to still pick riders with realisic podium aspirations but 3k might result in too many shared riders.
CQmanager said:I'm open to any idea. This is NOT my game. This is OUR game and I'm not even the one who started so whatever you guys will decide on will be implemented (if technically possible). The 3000 limit was based on consultation with Hugo who is the inventor of these games
boomcie said:Of the people who don't have Hesjedal, where do I rank? Since he seems to be the key pick, obviously.
Armchair cyclist said:You were indeed top of the Ryder-rejectors: 98 points clear of Nyssinator.
Sylvester said:I see.
It would be very interesting to see the ideal team!
dlwssonic said:Im honored to be the first ever GT cq winner!!
Armchair cyclist said:I don't know if there is a function in Excel that would identify that with more certainty: the best I could construct is:
HESJEDAL 425 715
DE GENDT 422 423
BASSO 609 309
HENAO 339 172
NIEVE 449 170
PHINNEY 383 157
RABOTTINI 52 155
TIRALONGO 276 144
DE MARCHI 42 80
for a total score of 2325, at a cost of 2997.
Armchair cyclist said:I don't know if there is a function in Excel that would identify that with more certainty: the best I could construct is:
HESJEDAL 425 715
DE GENDT 422 423
BASSO 609 309
HENAO 339 172
NIEVE 449 170
PHINNEY 383 157
RABOTTINI 52 155
TIRALONGO 276 144
DE MARCHI 42 80
for a total score of 2325, at a cost of 2997.
Armchair cyclist said:I think he means me
I hope my data is ratified on Monday/Tuesday, but I believe the final rankings to be as follows:
1 dlwssonic 1772
2 Handbrake 1687
3 FF'Wilco 1650
4 mc mountain 1648
5 Geraint too fast 1600
6 Mellow Velo 1556
7 Froome19 1551
8 Hilltopfinisher 1548
9 gustienordic 1538
<snip>
The spreadsheet is here on Googledocs.
mc_mountain said:So close to the podium, 2 points, and a few seconds away. Kwiatkowski 2 and a bit seconds away from scoring those points in the TT and Stetina 3 secs away from losing a place to Szymd in the GC. If scores had been even, FF Wilco having a stage winner would perhaps have been the tiebreaker though.
Thanks to Hugo, CQM and particularly Armchair whose tables and pre final stage analysis greatly enhancing my enjoyment of the game (enjoying my day in the provisional overall lead and allowing me to best monitor whether or not I could maintain the podium to go with my 3rd place in the 2011 overall game).
handbrake's 4th in 2011 game and 2nd here just beat my 3rd and 4th!
FoxxyBrown1111 said:Congrats from me too.
Hugo Koblet said:Congratulations dlwssonic! And thanks to cqmanager for organizing this. I think we should take a look at the budget once the Tour is approaching. I agree that we might "need" to up the budget for the Tour.
TeoSheva said:Congratulations
my team was really poor at the end: I put a lot of money on Scarponi and Rujano, but I got few points from them...