But the TT having 40% of its duration spent on climbing, that means that the wispy little climber should be able to limit his losses. Wispy climber or not, he does not lose over 2 minutes to Tejay in the 5km of flat that this TT includes. The rest of the time is either climbing (where Contador holds the advantage) or descending (where Contador is pretty good, and I don't know enough about van Garderen to know whether he'd gain any time here).
I mean, saying a "natural GC type rider would gain in the ITT" is just too vague, because the TT here in Euskadi is not the same as in, say, Sarthe, or Limousin. 25km here is not a flat time triallist's paradise that will see the powerful riders demolish the wispy little climbers, it's a course that will actually balance pretty well between the TT specialists and the wispy climbers. That's what happens in País Vasco. You wouldn't say that Contador should lose 2 minutes+ to Tejay if the TT was, say, to Kronplatz. But it's still an ITT.
Last year's País Vasco TT:
1 Martin
2 Quintana
3 Intxausti
4 Porte
Porte ought to beat the two Movistar guys in a normal TT, right?
2012:
1 Samu Sánchez
2 Mollema
3 Martin
4 Pinotti
5 Cunego
6 Rodríguez
Hey look, that's Purito in the top 10 of a TT. If HE is only losing 16" to Tony Martin, that ain't a normal ITT.
If it were a pan-flat 25km, maybe you'd have a point (I still think your 2 minutes is excessive, given back in the 2008 Vuelta Igor Antón, who has never shown the TT capabilities of a Contador even as a junior, lost 2'35 over an absolutely pan-flat 42km in Ciudad Real, which I see as a fairly reasonably representative time for a pure climber in a totally flat TT. Extrapolate from that what he would have lost over 25km, and you get 1'32). But it's not, so saying Contador losing less than 2 minutes to Tejay here (and what made Tejay the standard to judge against, btw?) would be the mark of ridiculousness is quite simply an unreasonable stance to take given the characteristics of the stage.