rm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
Ever since Katusha changed from Focus to the new Canyon TT bikes, Purito has improved greatly in the TT.Velolover2 said:Purito in buttom 20?
Any of the GC guys who are worse than him in a TT?
(And don't give me that he almost won a TT, the one in Pais Vasco was tailor made for him)
is this a troll post?Miburo said:Nvm i was wrong, he won the dutch ITT last week. He'll top 5 easily.
that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
No way, then the only stages important to GC will be uphill. You need some variation in what will decide the overall or you just end up with a higher profile Vuelta with only 20-30 minutes of climbing being important to the stage.rm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
I hope so, could be a little bit too technical for him, but after doing pretty well in the hard TdS ITT he seems to be n great shape.jens_attacks said:malori starts his monstrous reign.
Mayomaniac said:I hope so, could be a little bit too technical for him, but after doing pretty well in the hard TdS ITT he seems to be n great shape.jens_attacks said:malori starts his monstrous reign.
Ryo Hazuki said:that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
Arredondo said:Dumoulin or Cancellara for the stage.
I expect a good ride from Cav, Sagan and Kristoff. Riding a good ITT means the (small) chance of yellow for one day.
Taxus4a said:I think one of those guys is going to win the stage, but Froome will do a better ITT than some of those guys, maybe Cancellara...concorde said:pedromiguelmartins said:So... It's impossible for anyone to beat Sagan. Even if he has a flat, he should win with a comfortable margin.
Best ever place Sagan can get with a 100% race is 5th. There will be a gap after Martin, Cancellara, Dumoulin and Malori.. Over 30 second gap i bet between 4th and 5th. 5-15 is open.
Of course wont be that 30 second gap...in 30 seconds will be the first 50 riders of the stage, and in 1 minute 120 or more. that doenst mean Tony Martin could put one minute to some climbers with options in GC, and Froome close to that, and 1 inute is much time on the mountains.
bala v said:Taxus4a said:I think one of those guys is going to win the stage, but Froome will do a better ITT than some of those guys, maybe Cancellara...concorde said:pedromiguelmartins said:So... It's impossible for anyone to beat Sagan. Even if he has a flat, he should win with a comfortable margin.
Best ever place Sagan can get with a 100% race is 5th. There will be a gap after Martin, Cancellara, Dumoulin and Malori.. Over 30 second gap i bet between 4th and 5th. 5-15 is open.
Of course wont be that 30 second gap...in 30 seconds will be the first 50 riders of the stage, and in 1 minute 120 or more. that doenst mean Tony Martin could put one minute to some climbers with options in GC, and Froome close to that, and 1 inute is much time on the mountains.
Do you seriously mean that???
I also think that the lack of really difficult stages is the biggest problem of this tour, but to be honest we didnt have such a monster stage since 2011. The only stages comparable to that one (in reference to altitude, length and intensity of the stage) were the "Bagneres de Luchon stage" 2012 and maybe also the "Le grand Bornand stage" 2013Taxus4a said:Ryo Hazuki said:that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
That would be the normal route form a Tour... or even another ITT at the end, but I prefer just the first.
This year with such a difficult first week I can understand, but it is very little ITT.
With more ITT must be more hard mountains stages...At least an stage like this:
![]()
Long, at hight altitude, with hard climbs, at the end of the race...
this year there are no similar stages.
Taxus4a said:Ryo Hazuki said:that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
That would be the normal route form a Tour... or even another ITT at the end, but I prefer just the first.
This year with such a difficult first week I can understand, but it is very little ITT.
With more ITT must be more hard mountains stages...At least an stage like this:
![]()
Long, at hight altitude, with hard climbs, at the end of the race...
this year there are no similar stages.
Son of Amsterhammer said:Taxus4a said:Ryo Hazuki said:that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
That would be the normal route form a Tour... or even another ITT at the end, but I prefer just the first.
This year with such a difficult first week I can understand, but it is very little ITT.
With more ITT must be more hard mountains stages...At least an stage like this:
![]()
Long, at hight altitude, with hard climbs, at the end of the race...
this year there are no similar stages.
Surely stages like this just encourage the unmentionable?
Netserk said:Son of Amsterhammer said:Taxus4a said:Ryo Hazuki said:that would be the worst decision everrm7 said:Such a shame this is the only ITT.. They shoud have made this a 15 km TTT, and then the stage 9 as a ITT.
That would be the normal route form a Tour... or even another ITT at the end, but I prefer just the first.
This year with such a difficult first week I can understand, but it is very little ITT.
With more ITT must be more hard mountains stages...At least an stage like this:
![]()
Long, at hight altitude, with hard climbs, at the end of the race...
this year there are no similar stages.
Surely stages like this just encourage the unmentionable?
Sure it does
![]()
