- Aug 6, 2015
- 4,139
- 2
- 0
please be quietportugal11 said:Blame the sprinters. They should disappear from the road race and go to the track.
You could certainly add that to the list if you like. The only difference for me is that I think the Ponferrada course, with the longer climb, gave chances to the Ardennes specialists, it was a bit more balanced. They were just too passive and didn't make the race hard enough early on. So the race and result was a bit dull, but it wasn't so inevitable. The hilly one day specialists have had pretty much no chance on the courses in these last three years.Cance > TheRest said:I don't understand why you don't count Kwiatkowski's win in 2014 in that collection of world championships. Do you think that there's a huge difference between a race where the deciding attack comes with 3.5km to go and one where it's 7km to go?DFA123 said:Sure, Sagan got it spot on and it's a great win for him. Personally I think it's a shame that the podium for the biggest race in cycling has been made up for three years in a row now, by guys who were virtually unseen the entire race until the last 3km. This should be cycling's showpiece event - but it's been way more tedious than most monuments for four years now because of crap courses.ihosama said:Doha was had no hills. But otherwise yeah, the WCRR last few years was "classic" style race.DFA123 said:It's also what you get when the WC are designed for sprinters who can climb a bit for three years in a row. ...
But Belgians, et all doing all of nothing today had something to do with it. Sagan won of luck today, he had one card and played that card well. But that Ala will be caught was anything but certain.
Whatmovingtarget said:Cance > TheRest said:I don't understand why you don't count Kwiatkowski's win in 2014 in that collection of world championships. Do you think that there's a huge difference between a race where the deciding attack comes with 3.5km to go and one where it's 7km to go?DFA123 said:Sure, Sagan got it spot on and it's a great win for him. Personally I think it's a shame that the podium for the biggest race in cycling has been made up for three years in a row now, by guys who were virtually unseen the entire race until the last 3km. This should be cycling's showpiece event - but it's been way more tedious than most monuments for four years now because of crap courses.ihosama said:Doha was had no hills. But otherwise yeah, the WCRR last few years was "classic" style race.DFA123 said:It's also what you get when the WC are designed for sprinters who can climb a bit for three years in a row. ...
But Belgians, et all doing all of nothing today had something to do with it. Sagan won of luck today, he had one card and played that card well. But that Ala will be caught was anything but certain.
Kwia's win was the best since Evans in 2009.
Exactly. That's why it bothers me so much to call Sagan, or anyone else a wheelsucker when a rider wins.DFA123 said:Oh right, I took it more as a criticism of the course - that a rider could win without doing anything until the final km. If that's a criticism of Sagan then it's completely ridiculous - all attacking would have done is thrown away any chances on that course.Irondan said:The ones calling him a wheelsucker surely are.DFA123 said:Surely no-one is saying that Sagan is an undeserving winner. Just that it would have been a lot more fun to see him win the jersey on a more selective course - like RVV or Strade Bianche - than in a bunch sprint for the second year in a row.GraftPunk said:The Sagan hate is hilarious... He's one of the most attacking, exciting riders all year, but by all means keep complaining that he doesn't deserve it.
That's what anyones says when they think that a rider doesn't deserve to win.
Echoes said:d-s3 said:I guess nobody cares all that much what you're saying.
So what? I'm free to say whatever I want s long as it fit with the rules of the forum. Put on ignore if you don't like my posts.
Well alright then. Then that is now officially settled, no arguments will ever be needed to explain whymovingtarget said:Cance > TheRest said:I don't understand why you don't count Kwiatkowski's win in 2014 in that collection of world championships. Do you think that there's a huge difference between a race where the deciding attack comes with 3.5km to go and one where it's 7km to go?DFA123 said:Sure, Sagan got it spot on and it's a great win for him. Personally I think it's a shame that the podium for the biggest race in cycling has been made up for three years in a row now, by guys who were virtually unseen the entire race until the last 3km. This should be cycling's showpiece event - but it's been way more tedious than most monuments for four years now because of crap courses.ihosama said:Doha was had no hills. But otherwise yeah, the WCRR last few years was "classic" style race.DFA123 said:It's also what you get when the WC are designed for sprinters who can climb a bit for three years in a row. ...
But Belgians, et all doing all of nothing today had something to do with it. Sagan won of luck today, he had one card and played that card well. But that Ala will be caught was anything but certain.
Kwia's win was the best since Evans in 2009.
This is what I wanted to say, yeah.alspacka said:Asero831 said:what happened to Gavaria? Is he really a 2nd/3rd tier sprinter?
Needs to develop further for >250km, I guess
DFA123 said:I think it's time the WC was valued less than the other monuments. Certainly lower than PR , RVV or LBL. It's basically been an easy version of Milan Sanremo these last few years. Kudos to Sagan for winning, but the fact that he can still put out such a strong sprint compared with the other monuments, shows how relatively easy it has become.
Agreed. The winner should always be exempt from the wheelsucking tag. If anyone should be labelled like that, it should be the riders who were too passive and still didn't win - although on a course like that it was fair enough from all the favourites I think.Irondan said:Exactly. That's why it bothers me so much to call Sagan, or anyone else a wheelsucker when a rider wins.DFA123 said:Oh right, I took it more as a criticism of the course - that a rider could win without doing anything until the final km. If that's a criticism of Sagan then it's completely ridiculous - all attacking would have done is thrown away any chances on that course.
alspacka said:Aside from all the polemic Sagan business, is there anyone who doesn't love Alaphilippe? I've yet to meet them
DFA123 said:Agreed. The winner should always be exempt from the wheelsucking tag.
AgreedHelloDolly said:alspacka said:Aside from all the polemic Sagan business, is there anyone who doesn't love Alaphilippe? I've yet to meet them
I cant say I do.....I am kinda indifferent to him...He is a good rider but meh ..He is no Sagan, Valverde,Nibali, Contaodr or even Kwaito ...He is no Froome or Cancellera or Gilbert or Cavandish or Greipel. He is no Doumulin or Kiry or Pinot .....you get my drift
I don't want a stupidly hard race like next years. The WC should aim to find the best one day racer imo - so it should always give chances somewhere to all the one day specialists.Blanco said:DFA123 said:I think it's time the WC was valued less than the other monuments. Certainly lower than PR , RVV or LBL. It's basically been an easy version of Milan Sanremo these last few years. Kudos to Sagan for winning, but the fact that he can still put out such a strong sprint compared with the other monuments, shows how relatively easy it has become.
WC should always be valued higher, no matter how hard the race was. You will get a hard race next year.
I get it, you only like easy rides on winning bandwagons.HelloDolly said:alspacka said:Aside from all the polemic Sagan business, is there anyone who doesn't love Alaphilippe? I've yet to meet them
I cant say I do.....I am kinda indifferent to him...He is a good rider but meh ..He is no Sagan, Valverde,Nibali, Contaodr or even Kwaito ...He is no Froome or Cancellera or Gilbert or Cavandish or Greipel. He is no Doumulin or Kiry or Pinot .....you get my drift
Problem is that apart from the Flemish classics and maybe CSS finds the best racer. It's all reduced bunch sprints or uphill sprints.DFA123 said:I don't want a stupidly hard race like next years. The WC should aim to find the best one day racer imo - so it should always give chances somewhere to all the one day specialists.Blanco said:DFA123 said:I think it's time the WC was valued less than the other monuments. Certainly lower than PR , RVV or LBL. It's basically been an easy version of Milan Sanremo these last few years. Kudos to Sagan for winning, but the fact that he can still put out such a strong sprint compared with the other monuments, shows how relatively easy it has become.
WC should always be valued higher, no matter how hard the race was. You will get a hard race next year.
I want to see the likes of Sagan, GVA, Alaphilippe, Valverde, Matthews, Kwiatkowski, Martin and others all battling each other on a course which offers something for everyone. Not a bunch sprint or a ridiculously steep climb deciding the race.
Because winning justifies whatever tactic a rider decided to use.Echoes said:DFA123 said:Agreed. The winner should always be exempt from the wheelsucking tag.
Why?
GraftPunk said:I'm starting to think a shorter distance on a more selective course would shake things up. The six hours of riding seems to stifle proper racing, and for the last few years is simple attrition.
True. But I think a profile something similar to Strade Bianche, even without the gravel, but with WC distance and maybe with an easier final climb could work well. Or the Rio Olympic course with a slightly easier final climb - that was great.Red Rick said:Problem is that apart from the Flemish classics and maybe CSS finds the best racer. It's all reduced bunch sprints or uphill sprints.DFA123 said:I don't want a stupidly hard race like next years. The WC should aim to find the best one day racer imo - so it should always give chances somewhere to all the one day specialists.Blanco said:DFA123 said:I think it's time the WC was valued less than the other monuments. Certainly lower than PR , RVV or LBL. It's basically been an easy version of Milan Sanremo these last few years. Kudos to Sagan for winning, but the fact that he can still put out such a strong sprint compared with the other monuments, shows how relatively easy it has become.
WC should always be valued higher, no matter how hard the race was. You will get a hard race next year.
I want to see the likes of Sagan, GVA, Alaphilippe, Valverde, Matthews, Kwiatkowski, Martin and others all battling each other on a course which offers something for everyone. Not a bunch sprint or a ridiculously steep climb deciding the race.