You're ignoring the context. If you want to point out Schultz and Pedrero that's fine. If you think that undermines my argument, that's fine too. But it doesn't. Because he could not have been close to a 100%, which you acknowledged. So there is no shame in not finishing ahead of those guys who had not burned the same energy in the GC race. Maybe those guys just had a good day, which shows when comparing them to the other podium contenders. Yet at the same time after two weeks he did not lose a lot of time to some elite climbers on one of the hardest GT climbs. You want to call that cherry picking, but the same Giro he also finished along other favorites in stage 4 and was among the best climbers in stages 6 and 9. So in spite of the circumstances that weren't in his favor, there were still 4 stages in the 2021 Giro where his climbing performances were ranging from great to very decent. You can hardly call that cherrypicking. It is no more cherrypicking than you pointing out ''getting dropped like a brick'' in Lombardia, Tirreno and OS. Especially since up til that point, there had not been one mountain stage where he performed badly. For reference, on those other mountain stages in the first two weeks in the Giro, he always finished ahead of Schultz. Even after the Zoncolan he was still in the top 10 in GC, over 6 minutes ahead of Schultz and half an hour ahead of Pedrero. So comparing him to Bardet and others who also went for GC, is a hell of a lot less disingenuous than comparing him to Schultz and Pedrero. So no spin needed on my part. He also finished minutes ahead of Foss, Nibali, Valter, Grosschartner... You could say he ''dropped them like a brick'' in relative terms.
So you acknowledge he was disadvantaged during the Giro, but pointing out him finishing close to GC rivals on the hardest climb in the first two weeks is cherrypicking? In the 4 mountain stages in the first two weeks, he only lost 36 seconds in total to the guy who claimed the 3rd podium spot. But i'm cherrypicking, i'm sure. Two weeks of cherrypicking. Also interesting to hear (i'm quite sure it's the first time i've heard that argument) that he would be better on shorter steeper climbs, as opposed to longer steady climbs. The past year i've been hearing all about how steep climbs don't suit him, and now it seems the climbs in Itzulia all of a sudden should favor him as opposed to the 12k 8% climb in Norway. Especially since the Mikuni which you used as an example, resembles the climbs in Itzulia a lot more than the climb in Norway. Same goes for the climbs in Lombardia come to think of it.
Agreed that he likely won't outsprint Johannessen, so if he wants to win, he has to either drop him or choke him. That's not a point of debate here.