4th Mont Ventoux Dénivelé Challenge(1.1) - June 14th

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
is there anything too unusual about his performance?

He shouldn't have raced this to begin with, just after the Giro, I'd say, same as Gall. Instead both are lined up for Route du Sud as well.
He was good in Provence, but i haven't seen him since, and i certainly expected more from him in the Giro. Losing over 5 minutes today against not the best climbers is below what i would expect of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 16, 2009
17,599
6,854
28,180
So Pantani would have put 2 minutes on Guerreiro!
And Mayo even more. However that was an ITT.
Lopez last year was faster by 25"
LOL
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,915
44,297
28,180
This shows again that comparing climbing times in different races, conditions and circumstances can be very tricky. Does anybody think Guerreiro would drop all those legends (in their prime) on Ventoux?
I think especially very long climbs get super tricky with the comparisons because they tend to be both rarer and have much more differences in pacing strategies. In the Tour people don't really drill the early slopes of Ventoux for the yolo. Only in 2013 it was paced aggresively in the last 15 years.

Meanwhile Vingegaard was only 24s slower despite doing Kwiatkowski pace for 55 minutes.
 
Apr 10, 2019
12,075
15,989
23,180
I think especially very long climbs get super tricky with the comparisons because they tend to be both rarer and have much more differences in pacing strategies. In the Tour people don't really drill the early slopes of Ventoux for the yolo. Only in 2013 it was paced aggresively in the last 15 years.

Meanwhile Vingegaard was only 24s slower despite doing Kwiatkowski pace for 55 minutes.
Not to mention that wind plays a huge part on the Ventoux.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,915
44,297
28,180
Not to mention that wind plays a huge part on the Ventoux.
Yeah and it's generally unfavorable on the bald section of the mountain. If you convert to W/kg Ventoux climbs generally aren't very high despite often being unipuerto stages with low altitude for a climb this size. That said it's often hot.

Vaughters said Guerreiro did 5.92 W/kg today btw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 20, 2017
12,404
23,453
28,180
This shows again that comparing climbing times in different races, conditions and circumstances can be very tricky. Does anybody think Guerreiro would drop all those legends (in their prime) on Ventoux?
I think we all know the answer to that question. However, it’s still too fast a time to argue that the standard was mediocre today. Yes, the wind direction after Chalet Reynard helped, but it’s still only a minute off the fastest-ever non-MTT time (Pantani 1994) and there have been 15 non-MTT ascents of the full 21.5 kilometres since (including this one), that’s enough of a sample size to incorporate a lot of different contexts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 10, 2019
12,075
15,989
23,180
Yeah and it's generally unfavorable on the bald section of the mountain. If you convert to W/kg Ventoux climbs generally aren't very high despite often being unipuerto stages with low altitude for a climb this size. That said it's often hot.

Vaughters said Guerreiro did 5.92 W/kg today btw.
Yeah, Ventoux in general looks like a supe unreliable one to pick for me. If the (usually unfavorable) wind isn't blowing one day you go a lot faster on the bald section with the same amount of power output.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 20, 2017
12,404
23,453
28,180
Vaughters said Guerreiro did 5.92 W/kg today btw.
Based on power meter data or calculations? The calculation-based value I saw on Twitter was 5.98 W/kg, which would be better than all but one of Pogacar’s performances on 40+-minute efforts and therefore seems too high to me.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 10, 2019
12,075
15,989
23,180
I think we all know the answer to that question. However, it’s still too fast a time to argue that the standard was mediocre today. Yes, the wind direction after Chalet Reynard helped, but it’s still only a minute off the fastest-ever non-MTT time (Pantani 1994) and there have been 15 non-MTT ascents of the full 21.5 kilometres since (including this one), that’s enough of a sample size to incorporate a lot of different contexts.
It has to be said that the 1994 stage finished down in Carpentras after the descent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,915
44,297
28,180
Based on power meter data or calculations? The calculation-based value I saw on Twitter was 5.98 W/kg, which would be better than all but one of Pogacar’s performances on 40+-minute efforts and therefore seems too high to me.
40+ minute climbs just aren't super common and prone to shitty sample sizes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 20, 2017
12,404
23,453
28,180
It has to be said that the 1994 stage finished down in Carpentras after the descent.
True, but Ventoux was climbed almost annually during the EPO era, almost always as a MTF and two of those during the Tour, yet outside of the 1999 and 2004 MTTs Pantani’s 1994 time was untouchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jun 11, 2021
2,188
4,919
11,180
True, but Ventoux was climbed almost annually during the EPO era, almost always as a MTF and two of those during the Tour, yet outside of the 1999 and 2004 MTTs Pantani’s 1994 time was untouchable.
Almost annually is a bit of a push. They did it in 94, 99 (MTT), 2000, 2002, 2004 (MTT) and 2006+2007. So outside the MTTs only 94,2000 and 2002 where at the highest level. In 2000 they were not going too fast from the foot and had heavy headwind, reasonable big group stayed together until the pantani and Armstrong attack, even out of form Ullrich who had dropped 4 minutes on Hautacam lost only 30s. 2002 had not a high level outside Armstrong who didn't had to do that much.

I'd also split the term "EPO era". 90s: unlimited EPO until 97, controlled EPO (50%) until the test. 00s: Microdosing EPO and mostly BBs which varied in their effectiveness.
The overall performances were much higher at the end of the 90s than the 00s.

Anyway, this belongs in the clinic.
Overall, strong performance from Guerreiro but hard to draw too many conclusions from such one day climbing performances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 20, 2017
12,404
23,453
28,180
Almost annually is a bit of a push. They did it in 94, 99 (MTT), 2000, 2002, 2004 (MTT) and 2006+2007. So outside the MTTs only 94,2000 and 2002 where at the highest level. In 2000 they were not going too fast from the foot and had heavy headwind, reasonable big group stayed together until the pantani and Armstrong attack, even out of form Ullrich who had dropped 4 minutes on Hautacam lost only 30s. 2002 had not a high level outside Armstrong who didn't had to do that much.
They climbed it in both the Dauphiné and the Tour in 2000 and also in 2005, 1998 and 1996. Including MTTs, that's 11 ascents in 13 years from 1994 to 2006.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
Laughed when Valverde pulled the pin on the early slopes of Ventoux - It's an indictment on the sport when he gets called up at short notice ( when on holidays ) chasing UCI points.

lol. the fact that he is racing period is an indictment on the sport.