Woods was 37th and lost 13:15. Not a bad performance from that Niv guy though....but still ahead of the likes of Valverde, Skjelmose and Tolhoek.
Woods still hasn't finished...
Woods was 37th and lost 13:15. Not a bad performance from that Niv guy though....but still ahead of the likes of Valverde, Skjelmose and Tolhoek.
Woods still hasn't finished...
is there anything too unusual about his performance?WTF is Skjelmose doing lately?
That's true, might be better than last year then as he was really good in Suisse but faded in the Tour.so far it doesn't really look like Uran is peaking too early, to be honest![]()
I know Sosa sucks at 3 week races. But this is a little abnormal for him. Maybe if there was a lot of wind before the climb that did the trick for him.Sosa dropping directly in the bottom of Ventoux. What a meme he is.
He was good in Provence, but i haven't seen him since, and i certainly expected more from him in the Giro. Losing over 5 minutes today against not the best climbers is below what i would expect of him.is there anything too unusual about his performance?
He shouldn't have raced this to begin with, just after the Giro, I'd say, same as Gall. Instead both are lined up for Route du Sud as well.
Tailwind up to Chalet then crosswind.Absolutely insane climbing time from Guerreiro.
I think especially very long climbs get super tricky with the comparisons because they tend to be both rarer and have much more differences in pacing strategies. In the Tour people don't really drill the early slopes of Ventoux for the yolo. Only in 2013 it was paced aggresively in the last 15 years.This shows again that comparing climbing times in different races, conditions and circumstances can be very tricky. Does anybody think Guerreiro would drop all those legends (in their prime) on Ventoux?
Not to mention that wind plays a huge part on the Ventoux.I think especially very long climbs get super tricky with the comparisons because they tend to be both rarer and have much more differences in pacing strategies. In the Tour people don't really drill the early slopes of Ventoux for the yolo. Only in 2013 it was paced aggresively in the last 15 years.
Meanwhile Vingegaard was only 24s slower despite doing Kwiatkowski pace for 55 minutes.
Yeah and it's generally unfavorable on the bald section of the mountain. If you convert to W/kg Ventoux climbs generally aren't very high despite often being unipuerto stages with low altitude for a climb this size. That said it's often hot.Not to mention that wind plays a huge part on the Ventoux.
I think we all know the answer to that question. However, it’s still too fast a time to argue that the standard was mediocre today. Yes, the wind direction after Chalet Reynard helped, but it’s still only a minute off the fastest-ever non-MTT time (Pantani 1994) and there have been 15 non-MTT ascents of the full 21.5 kilometres since (including this one), that’s enough of a sample size to incorporate a lot of different contexts.This shows again that comparing climbing times in different races, conditions and circumstances can be very tricky. Does anybody think Guerreiro would drop all those legends (in their prime) on Ventoux?
Yeah, Ventoux in general looks like a supe unreliable one to pick for me. If the (usually unfavorable) wind isn't blowing one day you go a lot faster on the bald section with the same amount of power output.Yeah and it's generally unfavorable on the bald section of the mountain. If you convert to W/kg Ventoux climbs generally aren't very high despite often being unipuerto stages with low altitude for a climb this size. That said it's often hot.
Vaughters said Guerreiro did 5.92 W/kg today btw.
Based on power meter data or calculations? The calculation-based value I saw on Twitter was 5.98 W/kg, which would be better than all but one of Pogacar’s performances on 40+-minute efforts and therefore seems too high to me.Vaughters said Guerreiro did 5.92 W/kg today btw.
It has to be said that the 1994 stage finished down in Carpentras after the descent.I think we all know the answer to that question. However, it’s still too fast a time to argue that the standard was mediocre today. Yes, the wind direction after Chalet Reynard helped, but it’s still only a minute off the fastest-ever non-MTT time (Pantani 1994) and there have been 15 non-MTT ascents of the full 21.5 kilometres since (including this one), that’s enough of a sample size to incorporate a lot of different contexts.
40+ minute climbs just aren't super common and prone to shitty sample sizes.Based on power meter data or calculations? The calculation-based value I saw on Twitter was 5.98 W/kg, which would be better than all but one of Pogacar’s performances on 40+-minute efforts and therefore seems too high to me.
True, but Ventoux was climbed almost annually during the EPO era, almost always as a MTF and two of those during the Tour, yet outside of the 1999 and 2004 MTTs Pantani’s 1994 time was untouchable.It has to be said that the 1994 stage finished down in Carpentras after the descent.
Then why did you bother posting Guerreiro's W/kg for a 40+-minute climb in the first place?40+ minute climbs just aren't super common and prone to shitty sample sizes.
Almost annually is a bit of a push. They did it in 94, 99 (MTT), 2000, 2002, 2004 (MTT) and 2006+2007. So outside the MTTs only 94,2000 and 2002 where at the highest level. In 2000 they were not going too fast from the foot and had heavy headwind, reasonable big group stayed together until the pantani and Armstrong attack, even out of form Ullrich who had dropped 4 minutes on Hautacam lost only 30s. 2002 had not a high level outside Armstrong who didn't had to do that much.True, but Ventoux was climbed almost annually during the EPO era, almost always as a MTF and two of those during the Tour, yet outside of the 1999 and 2004 MTTs Pantani’s 1994 time was untouchable.
They climbed it in both the Dauphiné and the Tour in 2000 and also in 2005, 1998 and 1996. Including MTTs, that's 11 ascents in 13 years from 1994 to 2006.Almost annually is a bit of a push. They did it in 94, 99 (MTT), 2000, 2002, 2004 (MTT) and 2006+2007. So outside the MTTs only 94,2000 and 2002 where at the highest level. In 2000 they were not going too fast from the foot and had heavy headwind, reasonable big group stayed together until the pantani and Armstrong attack, even out of form Ullrich who had dropped 4 minutes on Hautacam lost only 30s. 2002 had not a high level outside Armstrong who didn't had to do that much.
lol. the fact that he is racing period is an indictment on the sport.Laughed when Valverde pulled the pin on the early slopes of Ventoux - It's an indictment on the sport when he gets called up at short notice ( when on holidays ) chasing UCI points.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Challenge Mallorca 2023 (January 25-29) | Professional Road Racing | 229 | |
![]() |
Vuelta a España 8th Ceratizit Challenge by La Vuelta, September 7th-11th, 2022 | Professional Road Racing | 85 |