The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Susan Westemeyer said:Thank you, Moose. That's enough now.
Susan
Susan Westemeyer said:Thank you, Moose. That's enough now.
Susan
Moose McKnuckles said:Sorry. I got carried away.
My work here is done.
Phantom Menace said:Both Lance and Alberto have had brain surgery. Perhaps something was done during this surgery that has enhanced their abilities on the bike. Perhaps they feel less pain, or the O2 centres of their brains were adjusted.
Race Radio said:Wasn't there another troll that tried to convince us that Armstrong's sudden improvement came from "Frontal Lobe Development"?
Wonder what happened to that guy?
Race Radio said:Wasn't there another troll that tried to convince us that Armstrong's sudden improvement came from "Frontal Lobe Development"?
Wonder what happened to that guy?
Phantom Menace said:That sounds like a far fetched idea. However, fighting to resume physical capacities after brain surgery (and Cancer in Lance's case) would require one to dig deep and push themselves to new limits. So I think we can all agree that what Lance and Alberto have experienced has indeed made them better bike racers.
Hugh Januss said:I think we can all agree that you have used "I think we can all agree" before.
Phantom Menace said:Race Radio uses this term as well.
Do you think fighting to come back to the sport you love would make you stronger or weaker?
Mellow Velo said:Doesn't matter how much mental digging you do, if the body can't cope.
the vagabond said:Left-handed people are more likely to become president of the U.S. than right-handed people. Statistically passes 99% confidence level. Why? Sample size is large enough to make randomness unlikely.
People who are good at cycling are more inclined toward baldness, depression, and mathematical ability than the population at large. (I don't have data for this, but any observant person who has been around cycling for a long time knows it's true.)
Your theory is weak, non-intuitive, and unworthy of serious discussion.
Galic Ho said:I better watch out then. My family history has all three. No wonder I love cycling.
Phantom Menace said:That sounds like a far fetched idea. However, fighting to resume physical capacities after brain surgery (and Cancer in Lance's case) would require one to dig deep and push themselves to new limits. So I think we can all agree that what Lance and Alberto have experienced has indeed made them better bike racers.
Phantom Menace said:That sounds like a far fetched idea.
Phantom Menace said:That sounds like a far fetched idea. However, fighting to resume physical capacities after brain surgery (and Cancer in Lance's case) would require one to dig deep and push themselves to new limits. So I think we can all agree that what Lance and Alberto have experienced has indeed made them better bike racers.
Rex Hunter said:Actually it's rudimentary science. It's why you'll note people in your own life usually improve at doing their jobs, especially if it is skill based, after they've reached their biological peek period between 19 to 25. Judgement and reasoning, which is dictated by the frontal lobe area of the brain, does not fully mature until your mid 20s.
For a sport like cycling where a great deal of discipline for training, and judgement during a race, is used, this is naturally important. And for someone like Armstrong, who was more immature and angry than your average young rider, this process would be more important. Put that together with the mental benefits of the cancer process - something that you rightly highlight -and we can all agree this process would impact Armstrong more than most. It doesn't necessarily explain his entire improvement, but it shows why he certainly would be a better rider after his mid 20s than before it, and indeed why that is the case for most riders or sportsmen - or indeed for any individual in their ordinary lives. Weren't we all stupid as F and less focused as young people? Didn't we take more silly risks when we were driving etc? We can all agree on that.
Moose McKnuckles said:Oh yeah, Mister Smarty-Pants, if the frontal lobe is so important, why did the Federation beat the Klingons, huh? You tell me that!
]
Alpe d'Huez said:Wait, wait! I just now saw this thread and have very important information that may add credence to the OP's theory.
Noted brain surgeon Frank Vertosick, MD wrote a popular book called "When The Air Hits Your Brain... (...things are never the same), Tales from Neurosurgery."
Now, I don't recall anything at all about greater strength, or anything like that. But I do recall him writing about some moderate, but noticeable behavior issues, and many many stories about people commenting on friends who were indeed never the same again after air hit their brain, some of them like walking zombies...and no, we're not talking lobotomized patients either. Just strange, off-beat personality changes.