Thanks for the link. Interesting reading.
"PFCs were considered ideal additives for ski wax because they are water repellent ."
QUOTE]
If you like that, you should also like this
http://biomed.brown.edu/Courses/BI108/BI108_2005_Groups/10/webpages/PFClink.htm
Don't you think that the picture of the mouse at the bottom of the page happily breathing liquid PFC is just so cute?
I guess you are young or else you would have remembered that mouse, it appeared in many magazine about 15 years ago. A few years after there were also a number of articles about related kidney failures and so on (people given PFC in tests because they objected to transfusion, unlike Vino and others).
As I remember it, in April or May 1998, i.e. just before Gianetti narrowly escaped death by PFC, there was an article in the Scientific American about blood substitutes, so that when the UCI issued its warning following Gianetti's accident I immediately tied together all those pieces of information i.e. SciAm-Gianetti-UCI.
(I really enjoyed the end of NY times article quoting Gianetti as taking PFC "à l'insu de son plein gré").
Then there was the miraculous resurrection of De Las Cuevas around the same period, winning the Route du Sud then the Dauphiné. Since it was well known he had tried all the drugs in the books, I assumed he was on something new. I was laughing while watching him on the TV. I guess it was PFC that was percolating through his skin, not just sweat. Considering he had survived all the other stuff he had absorbed without dying from it, it only make sense that he would have done better than Gianetti on PFC.
As Python said, PFC doping should be extremely easy to detect, it just oozes out of the body, so that you just let the guy in a room with a gas chromatographer and you get the signature.