CoachFergie said:What a joke, lets just go back to the dark ages. Hey everyone just do what feels good to you![]()
CoachFergie said:What a joke, lets just go back to the dark ages. Hey everyone just do what feels good to you![]()
elapid said:See, this is why I think you are an idiot. Our discussion on acupuncture proves what I am saying is correct. You cite papers and I cite papers each saying that acupuncture doesn't work and acupuncture works, respectively.
Our discussions have also shown that you do not know how to read and interpret scientific data, and I would guess based on your ignorance that you have never written a scientific paper or conducted a research experiment in your life.
CoachFergie said:The level of scientific certainty about acupuncture (very uncertain) will still be more relevant than someone's personal opinion on the matter.
With such a high level of uncertainty no doubt exacerbated by commercial interest in the area of pain management I would be looking at more evidence based solutions.
Just the same as resistance training. There is evidence that resistance training improves cycling performance but when compared to other forms of specific training it greatly pales in comparison.
The same with Frank Day's claim of the importance of crank length. .5% for the tallest of riders or shortest of riders using a 170mm crank. That is 4.2 seconds in a 40km time trial. Not all that important when compared to the gains one can make from training, diet, improving aerodynamics and equipment selection.
elapid said:See, this is why I think you are an idiot. Our discussion on acupuncture proves what I am saying is correct. You cite papers and I cite papers each saying that acupuncture doesn't work and acupuncture works, respectively.
Our discussions have also shown that you do not know how to read and interpret scientific data, and I would guess based on your ignorance that you have never written a scientific paper or conducted a research experiment in your life.
gregod said:this is probably a fool's errand, but at the risk of wasting everyone's time i will take you seriously for a second and explain how you are wrong.
first, no matter how much scientists have looked they have never found any possible mechanism for how acupuncture could have any efficacy. on top of that, there have been no double-blind controlled studies that have shown any efficacy outside of any known mechanism.
so how did your dog recover? it certainly is possible that the acupuncturist had some effect, but it wasn't due to the needles. i have never heard of an animal acupuncturist, but the ones who practice on humans typically do massage along with the treatment. if your dogupuncturist tried some hands-on technique, it is possible that this could have somehow trained the dog. another major factor is confirmation bias. you paid money for some treatment and your dog got better. often this has a way of "coloring" memories. let me be clear: i am not accusing you of lying. but if you look up confirmation bias on wikipedia you can get a detailed explanation of how memories can actually be manufactured by expectation of outcome.
on a side note: i used baidu to search for animal acupuncture and the only hits i got were from human acupuncture sites ridiculing "rich people in the west bastardizing the practice and mak[ing] everybody look bad." (my loose translation)
gregod said:this is probably a fool's errand, but at the risk of wasting everyone's time i will take you seriously for a second and explain how you are wrong.
first, no matter how much scientists have looked they have never found any possible mechanism for how acupuncture could have any efficacy. on top of that, there have been no double-blind controlled studies that have shown any efficacy outside of any known mechanism.
Rip:30 said:it's usually better to do a quick google search before making dismissive sweeping generalizations. condescension only works when you know what you're talking about.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811909005904
http://precedings.nature.com/documents/4128/version/1
http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v13/n7/full/nn.2562.html
Boeing said:Even if it is a psychological benefit it is still a benefit; person to person
Boeing said:Even if it is a psychological benefit it is still a benefit; person to person
RDV4ROUBAIX said:To be quite honest I avoid western medicine at all costs, you really want to give your money to the dark side like Pfizer who are basically poisoning the food you eat to make you sick so you have to use their product. Not this kid.![]()
Tapeworm said:Oh that western medicine is so evil. The fact that in the western world we don't have polio anymore is just a conspiracy to make money. Doctors prescribe every known drug they can in order to get their quotas and yearly kickback from the drug companies.
Yeah.
I'm getting a scope done on my elbow on Thursday to remove a bone chip. I am getting it attuned with crystals, waved with essential herbs, and then lots of needles to balance my chi. But I might have to subject myself those evil practitioners of western medicine to butcher my elbow open and take the damn thing out. Curse them!
RDV4ROUBAIX said:Had a feeling that I'd get a response like this if I didn't elaborate further. Western medicine meaning big pharma in today's sense. Of course if you have something that requires to be opened up, great, contributions to the medical world, sure, but big pharma is a forking joke, that's who I'm trying to avoid.
Polyarmour said:My ex wife was a doctor who also did acupuncture. She used to claim 1/3 got signficant benefit, 1/3 got some benefit, 1/3 got no benefit. FWIW.