A few months ago he barely broke 1:20 for a 1/2 marathon. Today he went 1:17:01, off the bike, in 90 degree heat.
He sure
"Responds" to "training"[/QUOTE]
Is there some type of confirmation from the World Triathlon Corporation that LA has an agreement for no testing? Is there some type of confirmation that they never test the top 3 places for their events? That seems ODD as in It is hard to believe they would have such a rule and agreement with one competitor. PRO TRI's athletes are a joke in my opinion so I would not be supprised.....
The Half Marathon time of sub 1:20 a few months ago and then a 1:17 in a Tri well since I can not find any official results for his half race I can only go by a tweeted result of 1:22 for the livestrong half. That is about 6:16 per mile in the 1:22 and then a 1:17 for the half after swim and bike about 5:53 per mile. Depends on if he was racing the 1:22 or not. There is a difference in these paces and it would have been a greater difference if he was just racing a half marathon. So in my opinion training could account for the quicker pace but it is hard to make a conclusion without knowing if he was just putting in some miles with the 1:22 result or if he was actually running for time. Then again if he was racing a 1:20 a month ago and now after swim and bike he drops to a 1:17 well that is some good training response.
LA has proven that he is not a great runner. His performance and technique needs improvement if he plans on being better at running.
I was reading somewhere in that Florida triathlon article that LA will be required to Qualify for KONA. That is good news because the last I had heard he was just going to be allowed to enter. Which in my opinion would be a crock of **** if they allowed that.
I linked an article about Alberto Salazars comments on LA’s running / marathon time. In my opinion he will never run a 2:30 fresh or whatever. His running is just that bad. One comment from Alberto that quotes LA’s millage comments for the training / mileage base for the marathon ….20 miles a week with a 10 mile long run…WTF! I say WTF because if he ran a 2:46 on 20 miles a week then…….????????? Just saying….without saying…..that is an “unbelievable” performance!
http://triathlon.competitor.com/201...endary-running-coach-for-ironman-advice_24430
“He’s going into this seriously,” he said. “The way he talked about it, he said, ‘You need to be able to get me to run 2:30 when I’m fresh. If I can do that, I can run 2:50-2:55 [in an Ironman], and if I can do that, I’ll win.’”
Many triathlon experts are quick to point out that Armstrong’s marathon performance at the ING New York City Marathon in 2006 does not suggest he’s capable of running fast enough in an Ironman to contest for the win. Based on his conversations with the cycling star, Salazar does not believe Armstrong was trained to his potential in that race.
“I was talking to a triathlon coach today and he said, ‘No way. He ran 2:46. You know how hard he trained to do that?’ I told him, ‘You have no idea how little he trained to do that.’ He was running like 20 miles a week. I mean, it was a joke. Lance told me, ‘You know we said my longest run was like 16, but it was actually closer to 10.’”