• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread

Page 477 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 9, 2012
766
0
0
Visit site
LaFlorecita said:
Why would they let him win a stage? That makes no sense.

Its about demoralising him. They didn't set out to win every single stage in every race. It's about making sure Contador does not win any, especially against Froome. For example there were certain stages in races this year that meant nothing to the overall GC, where Contador could have won but Sky put in extra effort to make sure he didn't.

It was a clever way of making him feel insignificant next to Froome/Sky.

The only good thing from a Contador fans point of view is that Froome will likely not have the same level of burning desire. I find it very unlikely that Froomes 2014 will match his 2013. In other words he will likely not win as many stage races (but will probably still win the tour)
 
Jun 9, 2012
766
0
0
Visit site
Angliru said:
Using Airstream as your reference doesn't help your argument. ;-) Seriously though until someone from Saxo other than Contador wins a grand tour or figures prominently in the battle for the top step of one, Contador's presence is justified and even in that circumstance his presence is still etched in stone as a minimum co-captain/leader.

Edit: You clarified you post. The Airstream comment stands though. :D

Airstream was one of few who said that Froome would tear the competition apart at the Tour:D
 
Contadoraus Schlecks said:
Its about demoralising him. They didn't set out to win every single stage in every race. It's about making sure Contador does not win any, especially against Froome. For example there were certain stages in races this year that meant nothing to the overall GC, where Contador could have won but Sky put in extra effort to make sure he didn't.

It was a clever way of making him feel insignificant next to Froome/Sky.

The only good thing from a Contador fans point of view is that Froome will likely not have the same level of burning desire. I find it very unlikely that Froomes 2014 will match his 2013. In other words he will likely not win as many stage races (but will probably still win the tour)

Where did it go wrong in Vuelta 2012?
 
ferryman said:
Where did it go wrong in Vuelta 2012?

Have you come up with any arguments that challenge the very obvious point that always gets put to you when you make that comment - that Froome had just podiumed the Tour so was coming down form wise?

Or are you just for ever act as if Contador beat a top form Froome hoping that if you repeat the lie enough times people will start to believe it?
 
The Hitch said:
Have you come up with any arguments that challenge the very obvious point that always gets put to you when you make that comment - that Froome had just podiumed the Tour so was coming down form wise?

Or are you just for ever act as if Contador beat a top form Froome hoping that if you repeat the lie enough times people will start to believe it?

Where is the lie in there Hitch?
 
The Hitch said:
Have you come up with any arguments that challenge the very obvious point that always gets put to you when you make that comment - that Froome had just podiumed the Tour so was coming down form wise?

Or are you just for ever act as if Contador beat a top form Froome hoping that if you repeat the lie enough times people will start to believe it?

In fact I will make it easier for you. Remembering why I posted in the first place. Do you believe Froome/Sky turned up at Vuelta 2012 other than the fact they thought they could win it and at the same time put one over an on the ropes Contador for 2013. Yes, of course they did. He/they failed. It can happen again.

Happy.
 
Jun 9, 2012
766
0
0
Visit site
ferryman said:
In fact I will make it easier for you. Remembering why I posted in the first place. Do you believe Froome/Sky turned up at Vuelta 2012 other than the fact they thought they could win it and at the same time put one over an on the ropes Contador for 2013. Yes, of course they did. He/they failed. It can happen again.

Happy.

Of course they did but Froome ran out of steam (as a result of his efforts at the Tour).
 
Brailsford had stated in the past that it was his and Sky's goal to "dominate".
They had to have some belief that Froome could win the Vuelta in 2012. They obviously overestimated how long Froome could maintain the form that he displayed in July, ultimately finishing more than 10 minutes down on the Vuelta gc winner.
 
Jun 9, 2012
766
0
0
Visit site
Miburo said:
For the new members make sure to not take Contadoraus Schlecks too seriously.

Don't wanna offend the guy but a lot of times the things he says doesn't make any sense. Just an advice.

So Contador has only a support role in the wc, at least this time he's honest ;)

That's extraordinarily rude. I'm sure new members are intelligent enough to evaluate my contributions on their own.
 
ferryman said:
Do you believe Froome/Sky turned up at Vuelta 2012 other than the fact they thought they could win it and at the same time put one over an on the ropes Contador for 2013. Yes, of course they did. He/they failed. It can happen again.

Happy.

They probably knew it was very unlikely that he would win as he had such a disadvantage.

They just gave it a try is all. And showed off the sponsor which at the end of the day is what its about.

And had they won it wouldn't have meant anything for the Tour.

Angliru said:
Brailsford had stated in the past that it was his and Sky's goal to "dominate".

Since when does citing Brailsfraud prove anything?

The guy is on record 1 month before Chris Froome broke out at the Vuelta saying clean riders are the ones who show potential from a young age.
 
LaFlorecita said:
Bad news, Alberto confirmed his role is to work for Valverde and Rodriguez and make sure the race ends in a sprint from a small group :(

Contador also lied about tactics in the 2013 Tour, remember:p

I don't know if that is going to happen. Spain riding for a sprint with Sagan as 2nd favourite isnt neccesarily the best idea.

Any DS who uses the team Spain have assembled (the best one) on that course, as a sprint train, well, they should marooned on some pacific island together with whatever ****er was the Ds of Movistar on Stage 9 of the TDF.
 
Jul 29, 2012
11,703
4
0
Visit site
The Hitch said:
Contador also lied about tactics in the 2013 Tour, remember:p

I don't know if that is going to happen. Spain riding for a sprint with Sagan as 2nd favourite isnt neccesarily the best idea.

Any DS who uses the team Spain have assembled (the best one) on that course, as a sprint train, well, they should marooned on some pacific island together with whatever ****er was the Ds of Movistar on Stage 9 of the TDF.

Exactly i don't believe anything Contador says anymore ;)

If he has good sensations he'll go for it. Purito and piti don't care about gold anyways, aslong as they get a medal :eek:
 
Miburo said:
Exactly i don't believe anything Contador says anymore ;)

If he has good sensations he'll go for it. Purito and piti don't care about gold anyways, aslong as they get a medal :eek:

That's completely spot on. They should all attack hard as hell to get rid of Sagan, Gilbert and every other fast rider. If they're good enough, Purito or Valverde can be there and win the sprint; if not it doesn't matter at least they rode to win.
 
Miburo said:
Exactly i don't believe anything Contador says anymore ;)

If he has good sensations he'll go for it. Purito and piti don't care about gold anyways, aslong as they get a medal :eek:

Murito ****ed up his 2012 Giro but aside from that I don't know if thats true. He earned that lombardia win fully last year. This year it was being too attacking that maybe cost him in Liege. Hes attacked even further out in Liege before.

In the Vuelta last year it was quite the contrary, he raced for 1st at the expense of 2nd (which he could have guaranteed easily by cooperating with Contador on Ancares or Lagos)

He attacks late on, sure, but usually thats because so often the finishes these days are geared to him, at the Vuelta anyway. And he does tend to win them. 10 gt stages in 3 years at Katusha. Since 2010 I think only cav has more.
 
trevim said:
That's completely spot on. They should all attack hard as hell to get rid of Sagan, Gilbert and every other fast rider. If they're good enough, Purito or Valverde can be there and win the sprint; if not it doesn't matter at least they rode to win.
The under 23 rode the course at about 24 miles per hour and the rate of attrition was high as usual. With 3 laps to go any of the teams who still have more than 3 guys in the front group will be able to do damage. Spain should be able to use Alberto at that time to really hurt the competition and then drop out.
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Visit site
LaFlorecita said:
Bad news, Alberto confirmed his role is to work for Valverde and Rodriguez and make sure the race ends in a sprint from a small group :(

There doesn't seem to be a place for him at the dinner table either:

1380299275_978511_1380299492_noticia_grande.jpg