- Feb 18, 2015
- 13,820
- 9,809
- 28,180
Re: Re:
And you have already posted often enough that his numbers in Covadonga were better than in 2012 and 2014, but that doesn't automatically mean he was also better this year. The pace was simply higher since Froome dropped early on and therefore there was a high pace for the whole climb. Or do you think Valverde, Chaves and Scarponi are all better than the best Contador ever because they beat him there.
I also don't think Quintana and Froome have such a superb statistic against Contador if you take out 2013. Or do you also think that Contador had his best numbers in that year?
Contador gained time on Froome in La Camperona because Froome blew himself up, just as Contador started the climb to fast in 2014. Instead let's take a look at all the other mtf's, because in almost all of them Contador was dropped by Froome, although he just followed him like in 2014. The big difference is that this year Froome has the Tour and the Olympics in his legs, while in 2014 the Vuelta was his first real gt.Taxus4a said:Gigs_98 said:I know you are analyzing cycling, but please throw away your calculator and watch the races instead.Taxus4a said:Matteo. said:I still believe that if he reaches again the level of this spring, he will worthily challenge Froome and Quintana. In certain one week races could actually beat them but through the three weeks of a GT , in the long run he will be defeated
He said before la Vuelta he was at his best and he showed his best all the Vuelta, he could even drop Froome sometimes as in la Camperona.. stop with that BS he was not at his best. Cotador has never been so strong as this Vuelta.
numbers said that, he has ever bee after his satio as strog as quitaa or froome, except he wast peaking, as Froome 2014 (but alberto wanst stroger reallu, just lucky) Vuelta or quitana 2014Vuelta, or i a ropute perfect for him as Pais Vasco.
If Contador put to Froome 1,5 min at the TTT and Quitaa crash the secod stage Contador win this Vuelta, becouse is just to follow Froome as he did in 2014.. and he can do that if he is so strong at he was now or i 2014.
What I see in 2014 is that Contador was lucky Froome did a mistake in the ITT, and he has just to follow Froome.. this year he need to attack, so he lost time, the only differece.
He was better than Froome at la camperona this year and worse in 2014, what you mean,that according to that he was better now?? no, the same he wasnt better in 2014 becouse he droped Froome in Ancares or Farrapona, just a few secod nafter to be wheelsuker him a lot..it is like if Quitana attack 1 km before Aitana, for sure he get 15 seconds...
That is ehat I saw,what you saw?
Besides, what I saw is accordig with numbers.. beter number of Contador ever in Covadonga.
What are you powerfull argumets?
If cotador didnt beat quitana and Froome as she did in the past is becoue he is weaker now...
Did he beat quitaa in Cataluña, didhe beat Froome at Dauphine?? didhe beat them peaking out of Pais Vasco anytimes??
NO
And you have already posted often enough that his numbers in Covadonga were better than in 2012 and 2014, but that doesn't automatically mean he was also better this year. The pace was simply higher since Froome dropped early on and therefore there was a high pace for the whole climb. Or do you think Valverde, Chaves and Scarponi are all better than the best Contador ever because they beat him there.
I also don't think Quintana and Froome have such a superb statistic against Contador if you take out 2013. Or do you also think that Contador had his best numbers in that year?
