- Jul 3, 2010
- 115
- 0
- 0
scribe said:A bit of sleeplessness probably exacerbates cancer too, but hardly causes it.
You say the nicest things.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
scribe said:A bit of sleeplessness probably exacerbates cancer too, but hardly causes it.
irritated_cycling_fan said:Common on people. Bash Armstrong all you want. Blame him for every horrible thing in cycling or the world if that makes you feel better. But please, don't do so at the expense of spreading misinformation about cancer in general and testicular cancer specifically. If you review all the credible cancer experts you will see they all say the same thing - there is no medical evidence supporting the theory that testosterone or EPO or any other drug causes testicular cancer.
.....Although medical experts don't know exactly what causes testicular cancer, any more than they know why people (mostly women) who have never smoked get lung cancer, they do know what increases the risk for testicular cancer.... Drug use of any kind isn't one of those risks.
As mentioned in some of the links below (yes, real medical information - directly from or based on medical experts and not some blow hard from MMA) what long term steroid use does do to the testicles is atrophy them and even that reverses when steroid use stops. There have been studies on steroid usage for over 3 decades at this point and if there was any link between them and testicular cancer it would be well know by now.
For those of you supporting the idea that bringing these allegations into the courtroom might make Armstrong look bad; it wouldn't happened. All the expert testimony goes in the other direction. Sure, you might be able to pay big money to some shyster doctor who will testify to whatever you pay them for but the real medical experts with the proven credentials would win out..... There's no reason to use medically inaccurate information.
irritated_cycling_fan said:Insinuating, or worse, stating out right, that testicular cancer is caused by drug use is doing a huge injustice to men and teenage boys everywhere who are diagnosed each year.
131313 said:You don't really say anything in your long-winded rant, but the fact remains that EPO use can cause tumor growth and there's no known cause for testicular cancer.
If you want to hang your hat on the fact that there's no known direct causal link, keep in my that this line of reasoning was used by the tobacco industry for 50 years.
Playing with these drugs is a huge risk, and many of the risks are still unknown.
Eyeballs Out said:So where are all the other one-ballers in the pro peloton then ? Should be dozens yeah ?
131313 said:"dozens"? Considering the incidence of testicular cancer, if there were "dozens" the drugs would have been pulled off of the market long ago...
As I said before, with something multicausal and of unknown origin, it's ridiculous to discount something as a potential cause because there's yet to be shown a direct link.
Likewise, if there were a higher incidences of testicular cancer in the professional peloton than in the general popluation, I wouldn't immediately claim "EPO causes cancer"...
For instance, I don't believe this is "proof" of anything:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/axelsson-positive-for-epo-faces-lifetime-ban
but it wouldn't surprise me at all if his doping contributed to his condition.
Eyeballs Out said:If there was a higher incidence of TC in the pro peleton than in the general population I would have thought the most the likely cause would be riding 20000 miles a year with one nut either side of a saddle
But as we've established there isn't a higher incidence. You might as well say there's a causal link between tweeting bollox and TC
Eyeballs Out said:But as we've established there isn't a higher incidence.
Eyeballs Out said:You might as well say there's a causal link between tweeting bollox and TC
The Hitch said:What about antequil. He died rather painfully of cancer and he took peds i think. Very weak compared to Amrstrongs doping programme i know. But still. Do people think in his case peds contributed?
David Suro said:Cobblestones speaks the truth.
Since the number of pro cyclists is so small and the doping protocols so varied and dynamic, it is almost impossible to derive any meaningful statistics.
Schulz, 29, said on the German television program ARD Sportschau Sunday evening that a rider, whose name he did not disclose, tested positive in 2007 for the hormone hCG (Human chorionic gonadotropin), usually associated with pregnancy. When found in men, it usually indicates a tumour, probably cancerous. However, hCG is also used in combination with anabolic steroids as a performance enhancing drug, to increase testosterone levels.
Schulz claimed that the anonymous rider was told by an employee of the BDR to "get a diagnosis of testicular cancer." The rider was able to get the false certificate from a cooperative doctor, Schulz said.
The German cycling federation is preparing to file charges against the unkown rider who allegedly claimed the federation told him to get a false diagnosis of testicular cancer to cover up a positive doping test. Meanwhile, Philip Schulz, who told of the case, has now said that it may not be true.
sektor7 said:So apparently with the modest results Lance had pre 1996 combined with getting cancer was convincing enough for him to take a whole bunch more of it after he was cured, enough to win 7 times in a row.
This from a B-rated MMA fighter clawing his way back from the WEC. I cant think of a more uninteresting fighter than Cael, well at least inside the ring.
Tim_sleepless said:"Hey... come and say that to my face!..... oh, hang on a minute.."
NashbarShorts said:For the enjoyment of others, when did Pharma say this, and in what context?
Whatever the answer, I know it's gonna be good![]()
The American looked over to the crowd and barked at the fan three times: "Come and do that to my face."
jimmypop said:I don't believe that this MMA fighter is living in our universe. Despite the courageousness of the statement, this would never see the inside of a courtroom, for the same reasons Armstrong hasn't successfully sued anyone who insinuates publicly that he doped.
However, wasn't there some discussion of a correlation between EPO therapy and increased tumor growth?
Also, Armstrong's net worth is $150-200mil, according to my google-fu.
Polish said:The assertion that "EPO caused Lance's cancer" is as silly as the assertion that "EPO transformed Lance into a 7 time TdF winner".
I suppose one might be sillier than the other, hard to say. Tough choice.