- Jul 28, 2010
- 125
- 0
- 0
Cimacoppi49 said:I was a administrative law judge in NYC hearing workplace violations by city civil service workers. Drugs in the workplace, emergency environmental based property seizures, time and leave violations (the guy whose father in India died twice necessitating emergency leave). Stuff like that. I received commissions from Mayors Kotch, Dinkins and Guilani to hear cases. Before that I was a corporate trial attorney in NYC.
What follows is pure speculation. I don't see Armstrong taking any pleas. He is a man filled with hubris that prevents him from seeing and weighing accurately that which is presently threatening him. It's quite different from perceiving threats in a cycle race. As an attorney, he is the kind of client you love to hate--he has the money for large retainers up front, but you are in the position of always having to spin a fantasy with every revelation. At some point, some attorneys, if they have a conscience, will say enough and tell him to get another attorney. The US adversarial system is set up so that you don't really need a conscience to be a lawyer. There are two basic rules of legal ethics in the US--Don't co-mingle client funds and keep your mouth shut.
If convicted, I do think he will serve significant time. His hubris will be on full view for the sentencing judge in that phase of the trial. Victims will get to address the court. As to the financial risks to him, I am certain his criminal counsel have advised him well of the risks. Whether or not he "heard" them is another matter.
As I've been saying for a year now, sit back, pour a glass of good wine and get ready. The show is about to begin in earnest.
Interesting post. What are your views on the civil aspects of this mess? Could players like SCA & Discovery Channel break out the ion cannons & zap Armstrong with bolts of white hot litigation?
David Walsh in the most recent issue of the Sunday Times said they are watching this investigation with a view to reopening the 2006 libel case that was settled in Armstrongs favour. If that happens Armstrong will be liable for brutal legal fees.